Chennai Court October 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The Managing Director Chennai Metropolitan Transport Corporation Ltd. ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-03-2012
(PRAYER :- Appeal against the judgment and decree dated 20.11.2007 made in MCOP No.5267 of 2002 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (IV Court of Small Causes), Chennai. The Transport Corporation, being dissatisfied with the quantum of compensation awarded by the Tribunal, has directed this appeal. 2. On 13.03.2002, one Joseph Frank lost his life in a road accident. The claimants are his dependents. The Tribunal granted them Rs.3,84,000/-. 3. Learned counsel for the Transport Corporation contended that the deceased himself contributed to the accident, he was guilty of contributory negligence, so, there must be gradual reduction of the compensation amount. 4. On the other hand, the learned counsel for the Insurance Company contended that based on the evidence on record, the entire negligence was fixed on the Corporation driver. 5. I have considered the rival submissions. Perused the materials on record and the impugned Judgment. 6. Negligence is a reckless act by a person....
S.R.Selvaraj and Others Vs. Krishna Rathi Ammal and Others
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-01-2012
(Second Appeal filed under Section 100 CPC as against the judgment and decree, dated 06.03.2007, passed by the V Additional Judge, City Civil Court at Chennai, in A.S. No.707 of 2006, confirming the judgment and decree, dated 21.07.2006, passed by the VII Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai, in O.S. No.6992 of 2001. Civil Revision Petition (NPD) filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the order dated 06.03.2007 passed in CMP No.77 of 2007 in A.S. No.707 of 2006 on the file of the V Additional City Civil Court, Chennai.) COMMON JUDGMENT The present Second Appeal and the Civil Revision Petition were directed to be listed before this Court as 'specially ordered cases' along with Writ Petition No.26002 of 2001 filed by respondents-3 to 7 in the Second Appeal as against the impugned order dated 15.12.2001 passed by the R.D.O., Chengalpattu. During the pendency of the said Writ Petition, it seems that R3 to R7 in the Second Appeal/petitioners in the W.P. file...
N.Jothi Vs. the Secretary, Department of Home, Government of Tamil Nad ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-01-2012
(This miscellaneous petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a direction to the respondents herein to produce the records relating to the security coverage provided to the petitioner from its inception till date.) Pending disposal of the main writ petition seeking a Mandamus to enhance the security cover given to the petitioner and to his residential house, the petitioner has come up with the above miscellaneous petition, seeking a direction to the respondents to produce the records relating to the security coverage provided to the petitioner from its inception till date. 2. I have heard Mr.N.Jothi, petitioner appearing in person and Mr.A. Navaneethakrishnan, learned Advocate General, assisted by Mr.M.C.Swamy, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. 3. The petitioner is an Advocate. He was also a Member of Parliament during the period from 2002-2008. 4. According to the petitioner, he was informed by a high ranking Police O...
- ‹ Prev
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- Next ›