Chennai Court October 2012 Judgments

Derby Clothing Private Ltd, Represented by Its Managing Director Vijay ...

Court: Chennai

(Prayer: Petition filed seeking for a writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st Respondent to take up the extension petition dated 09.10.2012 in S.P.No.87 of 2012 in A.P.No.28/12 and decide the same within the time frame fixed by this Court.) 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. 2. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had submitted that it would suffice, if the time granted by the first respondent, by his order, dated 10.09.2012, to make necessary payment, may be extended for a further period of four weeks. 3. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents has no objection for such an order being passed by this Court. 4. In view of the above, the petitioner is granted further time of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, for complying with the directions issued by the first respondent, by h...

Amubee Vs. A. Kamaruddin

Court: Chennai

(Prayer: Criminal Revision is filed under Sections 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C., to call for the records in C.A.No.301 of 2005, on the file of the Additional District and Sessions Judge and Presiding Officer Special Court for EC Act cases, Coimbatore dated 13.12.2005 confirming the order of conviction passed in C.C.No.344 of 2003, on the file of Judicial Magistrate-V, Coimbatore dated 16.06.2005 set-aside the same.) 1. The revision petitioner / appellant / accused has preferred the present revision in Crl.R.C.No.1633 of 2005 against the judgment made in C.A.No.301 of 2005, on the file of the Additional District and Sessions Judge and Presiding Officer Special Court for EC Act cases, Coimbatore, confirming the order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate-V, Coimbatore in C.C.No.344 of 2003, convicting the petitioner under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act and imposing a sentence of six months imprisonment and a fine of Rs.4,000/- in default to undergo two months simple imprisonment...

M. Ramachandran and Another Vs. Arun Maharajan

Court: Chennai

(This petition is filed under Sections 3 and 7 to 10 of the Guardian and Wards Act, 1890 to appoint the petitioners as the guardian of the persons and property of the minors Sethana Jagadiswari born on 18.10.2002 and Sethan Annamalai born on 10.6.2004 and to grant custody of the minors to the petitioners from the respondent.) This original petition is filed by two petitioners who were grand parents of the minor female child Sethana Jagadiswari and minor male child Sethan Annamalai seeking for appointing them as guardians of persons and property of minors and for the grant of custody of the minor children to the petitioners from the respondent. 2. The O.P was admitted on 23.8.2006. Since the respondent was evading service, this court directed notice to be served through Inspector of Police, H3 Police Station, Thondaiarpet, vide order dated 15.6.2009. The petitioner filed an application in A.No.216 of 2007 seeking for an interim custody of the minor children. This court found that the ch...

MA. Gouthaman and Another Vs. the State of Tamilnadu, Rep.by Its Secre ...

Court: Chennai

(Prayer: W.P.No.12915 of 2012: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st and 2nd respondents to forbear the 4th respondent from acting as the 293rd Guru Maha Sanneedhanam of the 3rd respondent Adheenam by holding his appointment as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to the provisions contained in Tamilnadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959. W.P.No.8260 of 2012: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to act in accordance with law on the petitioner's various representations more particularly representation dated 13.06.2012 and direct the 5th respondent to take custody and protection of the endowment of the Madurai Aadeenam Mutt situated at No.70, South Avani Moola Street, Madurai-1 and all the properties and other endowments belongs and attached to the Madurai Aadeenam Mutt and administer the same in a...

M/S. S.R. Thanga Maligai, Rep. by Its Managing Partner S. Santhakumar ...

Court: Chennai

(Prayer:Petition filed seeking for a writ of Certiorari to call for the records of the respondent in his proceedings in TIN 33391382612/2010-11 dated 13.06.2012 and consequential notice in TIN No.33391382612/2010-11 dated 05.09.2012 and quash the same as illegal.) 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent. 2. It has been stated that the respondent had passed the assessment order, dated 13.06.2012, under Section 22(2) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006, based on the returns filed by the petitioner, relating to the assessment year 2010-2011. However, the respondent had not considered the Input Tax Credit through the purchase tax paid by the petitioner, under Section 12 (2) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006. Therefore, the petitioner had made a representation, dated 13.06.2012, under Section 22 (2) of the said Act. However, the respondent had rejected the claim of the petitioner, by his ord...

C.R.Sivakumar Vs. K. Balakumar

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2013(1)MLJ(Crl)257

(Prayer: Criminal Revision is filed under Sections 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C., against the order passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court-I, Coimbatore in Criminal Revision Petition No.201 of 2003, dated 25.11.2004 enhancing the punishment of the order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate-V, Coimbatore in S.T.C.No.1499 of 1998, convicting the petitioner by judgment dated 30.10.2003.) 1. The revision petitioner / respondent / accused No.2 has preferred the present revision in Crl.R.C.No.108 of 2006 against the judgment made in Criminal Revision Petition No.201 of 2003, on the file of Additional Sessions Judge / Fast Track Court-I, Coimbatore modifying the judgment passed in S.T.C.No.1499 of 1998, on the file of the Judicial Magistrate-V, Coimbatore. 2. The respondent / complainant's case is as follows:- The second accused, is the partner of the first accused firm. The second accused had borrowed a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- from the complainant on 01.10.1997 agre...

P.K. Balakrishnan Vs. K.M. Ayya Kannu

Court: Chennai

(Prayer: Criminal Revision is filed under Sections 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C., against the judgment of conviction and compensation dated 26.09.2008 passed by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, (Fast Track Court-II) Salem and made in C.A.No.50 of 2008, on its file confirming the judgment of conviction and compensation of Rs.4,00,000/- and set-aside the sentence of one year rigorous imprisonment by judgment dated 19.02.2008 by the learned Judicial Magistrate-I, Mettur Dam and made in C.C.No.50 of 2007.) 1. The revision petitioner / appellant / accused has preferred the present revision in Crl.R.C.No.1565 of 2008, against the judgment made in C.A.No.50 of 2008, on the file of the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court-II, Salem modifying the judgment passed in C.C.No.50 of 2007, on the file of Judicial Magistrate-I, Mettur Dam. 2. The respondent / complainant's case is as follows:- The complainant and accused are both engaged in the business of lorry tra...

S. Venugopal Vs. the Presiding Officer, Vellore and Another

Court: Chennai

(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue Writ of certiorari mandamus as stated therein.) 1. The petitioner seeks for issuance of writ of certiorari mandamus to quash the award passed by the first respondent-Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Vellore, in I.D.No.289 of 2000, dated 14.11.2003, by calling for the records connected thereto, with a consequential direction to the second respondent Corporation to reinstate the petitioner into service with continuity of service, backwages and all other attendant benefits. 2. The petitioner was working as a Conductor in Tiruvannamalai Branch under the second respondent Corporation. On 13.03.1995, when he was on duty in the bus bearing Registration No.TN-23-0-296-203 (M) proceeding from Vandavasi, the Checking Inspector boarded bus at Kadaisikulam bus stop, whereby on verification by the Checking Inspector, it was found that the petitioner had issued tickets only upto 70 passengers out of 80 passenger...

V.M. Rajamani Vs. the District Collector and Others

Court: Chennai

(Prayer: Petition filed seeking for a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's representations dated 01.10.2012 and thereby direct the respondents 1 and 2 to take suitable action against the 5th respondent who purposely mentioned the measurement of the quarry situated at S.F.No.471 to an extent of 0.80.0 hectare in Kuttupakkam Village, Arakkonam Taluk, Vellore District and consequently rectify the mistakes by measuring the said quarry land as per the order passed by the 1st respondent in Na.Ka.799/2012 (Minerals) dt.13.09.2012 and enable the petitioner to carry on his quarry business.) 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. 2. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had submitted that it would suffice, if the second respondent is directed to dispose of the representation, dated 01.10.2012...

M/S. Sri Gajalakshmi Oil Mills, Rep by Its Proprietor-k. Shanmugam, Ve ...

Court: Chennai

(Prayer: Petition filed seeking for a writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st Respondent to return the cheque bearing Nos.502895/10.10.2012 for Rs.5,15,561 and 502894/25.10.2012 for Rs.5,00,000/- for a total sum of Rs.10,15,561/- drawn on Punjab National Bank, Vellore forcibly collected from the petitioner at the time of inspection on 24.09.2012 by the officials of the 2nd Respondent as per the representation made by the petitioner dated 26.09.2012.) 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents. 2. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had prayed that this Court may be pleased to direct the first respondent to return the cheque bearing No.502895, dated 10.10.2012, for a sum of Rs.5,15,561/- and the cheque bearing No.502894, dated 25.10.2012, for a sum of Rs.5,00,000/- (for a total sum of Rs.10,15,561/-), drawn on Pubjab National Bank, Vellore...