Chennai Court June 2011 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
T.Paramasivam Vs. the Principal Chief Conservator of Forest and anr.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-06-2011
1. The writ petition is directed against the order of the Government dated 7.3.2007, by which the Government rejected the appeal filed by the petitioner against the order of the Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, who has imposed the punishment of stoppage of increment for two years with cumulative effect.2. The petitioner was serving as a Forest Guard at Vepaddy Palakadu Beat, Attur Range in the year 1984. The allegation made against him and two other Forest Watchers was that, on 18.11.1984, they demanded illegal gratification of Rs.2,000/- from one Chandran @ Ramachandran and then reduced the amount to Rs.1000/- and accepted the same but remitted a sum of Rs.15/- by manipulating the official records. Certain other allegations were also made. The disciplinary proceedings were entrusted to the Tribunal for Disciplinary Proceedings, Coimbatore and the following charges were framed against the petitioner: That actuated by dishonest motive and in abuse of your (Accused Officers 1 and ...
V.Thiagarajan Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-06-2011
1. The writ petition is directed against the order of the second respondent, Commissioner, Hindu Religious Endowment Department, dated 21.12.2010 and the subsequent modification order dated 14.02.2011.2. The petitioner is a President of the Hindu Baktha Jana Sabai, which is a registered Society. He is a resident of Tiruparunkundram, Madurai District and is a pious Hindu and believer in fostering inter-religious friendship and filed the above writ petition as a Hindu worshipper.(a) Arulmigu Madanagopalaswamy Thirukoil, Madurai, is one of the ancient temples. There was an advertisement in Daily Thanthi dated 5.01.2011, calling for tenders for allotment of shops in the proposed commercial complex in the temple. It is stated that on 11.01.2011, the petitioner sent a representation to respondents 1 and 2, opposing the proposed construction and he has also asked for information regarding the sanction if any granted by the Government for the proposed commercial complex. (b) The petitioner has...
P.Arumugam Vs. the Chief General Manager State Bank of Mysore and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-06-2011
1. The writ petition is directed against the order of the first respondent dated 22.10.2007, confirming the order of compulsory retirement passed against the petitioner by the second respondent dated 17.7.2007.2.1. The petitioner was serving as a Manger in the Service Branch of the State Bank of Mysore, Chennai, under the control of respondents 4 and 5 at the time when the impugned order of compulsory retirement was passed against him as a punishment.2.2. While he was working as a Manager, Audit (Mobile) Inspection Department, Bangalore, he was assigned the duty of inspection and audit of Sullia Branch of State Bank of Mysore for the period from 28.10.2005 to 19.11.2005. During the said period, for his stay in the hotel called Hotel Southern Residency, Sullia, he has claimed reimbursement of lodging bills and halting allowance for 22 days along with travelling allowances and the bill was passed.2.3. It is stated that, during the course of his audit, he has exposed several irregularitie...
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited Vs. M/S. Wipro Net Ltd.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-06-2011
1. The Civil Suit is filed for a judgment and decree, directing the defendant to pay the plaintiff a sum of Rs.36,87,082/- in respect of the Circuit Nos.10000124 and 10000125 installed by the plaintiff together with interest @ 18% from the date of bill till the date of payment in full on the principal sum of Rs.27,30,419/- with costs.2. The following are the contents in the plaint:-2.(a) The plaintiff is a limited company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, having its Registered office at New Delhi and having its other offices at various places and the plaintiff office is situated at Chennai, from whom the defendant availed Dedicated Cable Circuit bearing No.10000124 and 10000125 under the agreement form in the year 2000, that in the said form the defendant had agreed to pay the annual rental at the rates prescribed by the department, that by letter dated 9.5.2001 the defendant requested the plaintiff for shifting the Primary MUX provided at Mylapore Exchange to Haddows Road Ex...
K.Murugeswari Vs. Tamil Nadu State Election Commission and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-06-2011
1. This writ petition is directed against the order of the first respondent, viz., Tamil Nadu State Election Commission, represented by its Secretary, dated 3.1.2011, by which the first respondent by exercising the suo moto powers conferred under Rule 139 of the Tamil Nadu Town Panchayats, Third Grade Municipalities, Municipalities and Corporations (Elections) Rules, 2006 (for brevity, the Election Rules, 2006) has cancelled the proceedings of the Assistant Returning Officer publishing the list of validly nominated candidates in Form-6 on 30.12.2010 in respect of election of Councillor for Ward No.45 of Madurai City Municipal Corporation and directed to revise the same in accordance with the rule provisions.2.1. The petitioner's husband was elected as a Ward Councillor of Ward No.45 of the Madurai Corporation and he died on 2.6.2010. In order to fill up the casual vacancy, the first respondent has issued a notification on 16.12.2010 publishing the programme of election for the said War...
Mohamed Mujeebur Rahman Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-06-2011
1. The writ petition is for a direction against the second respondent, viz., Tamil Nadu Wakf Board, to restrict its supervisory control over the Nawab Fazilathunnissa Begum Sahiba Mosque Endowment Chennai only in accordance with the terms and clauses of the scheme decree dated 10.2.1941 made in O.S.No.63 of 1940 on the file of the Principal Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.2.1. The Fazilathunnissa Begum Sahiba Mosque Endowment (for brevity, the Mosque Endowment) is situated in Anna Salai, Nandanam and was dedicated by its ancestor Nawab Fazilathunnissa Begum Sahiba through a Will dated 30.1.1877 and a Codicil dated 2.2.1877. It is stated that the Sub Court, Chengalpattu has framed a scheme for the administration of the Mosque Endowment in the judgment and decree dated 10.2.1941 in O.S.No.63 of 1940 and according to the petitioner, since then the Mosque Endowment has been administered as per the terms of the scheme decree made in the above suit.2.2. As per the scheme decree, seven trust...
Vasnatha Meena Enterprises Vs. Baskaran and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-06-2011
1. The contempt complained of is in respect of the order dated 18.8.2010 passed in W.P.No.11239 of 2010.2.1. The said writ petition (W.P.No.11239 of 2010), which has been filed by Vasantha Meena Enterprises, which is a proprietary concern represented by its Proprietrix, was taken for disposal along with another writ petition in W.P.No.11240 of 2010 filed by Meena Health Care (P) Limited, which is a company registered under the Companies Act, represented by its Managing Director, V.Meenakshisundaram, who is the husband of N.M.Sathammai. The said writ petitions were filed challenging the orders of the second respondent, viz., the Assistant Director of Drugs Control, Zone-III, directing to appear for an enquiry and for a direction against the second respondent to grant sufficient time to answer the show cause notice dated 20.3.2010.2.2. According to the petitioner, her family, including her husband, who is the Manager of the petitioner/proprietary concern, has been doing the business in m...
Ar.Shanmugha Murthy and anr. Vs. the Principal District Judge and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-06-2011
1. These writ petitions arise from the orders passed by the Co-operative Tribunal under Section 152 of the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act, 1983 (for brevity, the Act) confirming the orders of the Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies (Housing) passed in the surcharge proceedings initiated under Section 87 of the Act.2.1. The petitioner in W.P.Nos.47776 and 50020 of 2006 and 7764 of 2007, who is one and the same, was in additional charge as Co-operative Sub Registrar/Special Officer of the Tittakudi Taluk Co-operative Housing Society between 4.10.1995 and 14.7.1996, and from 1.11.1996 to 17.4.1997. Between 15.7.1996 and 31.10.1996, M.Jayaraman (petitioner in W.P.No.49118 of 2006) was in additional charge of the Tittakudi Taluk Co-operative Housing Society as Special Officer.2.2. The Tittakudi Taluk Co-operative Housing Society was constituted for purchasing lands, forming house sites and selling the plots to its members. Insofar as W.P.No.47776 of 2006 is concerned, accordin...
P.Devi and ors. Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-06-2011
1. These writ petitions are filled challenging the order of the first respondent in G.O.(2D) No.49, School Education (P2) Department, dated 28.9.2006 insofar as the observation of pendency of criminal case in paragraph (5) is concerned and to direct the respondents to absorb the petitioners in any one of the Government Aided Primary Schools with continuity of service.2.1. While the petitioner in W.P.No.3981 of 2007 was appointed as a Secondary Grade Teacher on 19.11.2002 in Sri Krishna Aided Primary School at Kumbakonam, Tanjore District, which is a Government Aided Private School governed by the Tamil Nadu Recognised Private Schools (Regulation) Act, 1973, the petitioner in W.P.No.3982 of 2007 was appointed as a Secondary Grade Teacher in the said school on 8.12.1993 and the petitioner in W.P.No.3983 of 2007 was appointed as a Secondary Grade Teacher in the said school on 12.11.2003.2.2. The said Sri Krishna Aided Primary School is the school in which the fire accident occurred on 16....
The Management of Best and Crompton Engineering Limited Vs. A.M.Sekar ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-06-2011
1. In all these writ petitions, the petitioner/respondent before the Labour Court (hereinafter referred to as the Management) has challenged the awards of the Labour Court in the industrial disputes raised by the first respondents/petitioners before the Labour Court (hereinafter referred to as the employee(s)) under Section 2-A(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for brevity, the Act) directing the Management to reinstate the employees in service with full back-wages, continuity of service and all other attendant benefits.2. By virtue of the judgment of the Hon'ble First Bench of this Court in W.A.Nos.1438 of 2008, etc. batch, dated 5.11.2008, it is informed that the employee in W.P.No.11860 of 2006 (G.Sumathi I.D.No.633 of 2002), the employee in W.P.No.11539 of 2006 (K.U.Suresh Kumar I.D.No.630 of 2002) and the employee in W.P.No.11204 of 2006 (R.Srinivasan I.D.No.632 of 2002) were reinstated on 9.4.2009.3. It is also brought to the notice of this Court that the employee in W.P.N...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »