Chennai Court April 2011 Judgments
Baby Electronics, Rep. by Its Proprietrix Vs. P. Subramaniam (Deceased ...
Court: Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai
Decided on: Apr-29-2011
The 1st Respondent as complainant filed a complaint before the District Forum, Coimbatore, alleging deficiency against the opposite party to repay the amount collected from me together with interest at the rate of 12% p.a. or in alternate to replace a new original BPL 20 Digital Power Zip TV with relevant records and guarantee and also pay a sum of Rs.25,000/- as compensation for mental agony, physical starin etc., and to pay Rs.1500/- towards cost. The District Forum, allowed the complaint against the opposite party. Against the said order, this appeal is preferred by the opposite party, praying to set aside the order of the District Forum, Coimbatore, dated 6.4.06 in O.P.No.11/2004. This appeal coming before us for hearing finally on 15.04.2011, upon hearing the arguments of the counsel on both sides, and perused the documents, written submissions as well as the order of the District Forum, this Commission made the following order :- A.K.ANNAMALAI, PRESIDING MEMBER JUDICIAL 1. The op...
Tag this Judgment!M/S. Arihant Computers (P) Ltd., Rep. by Mr.Kothari Vs. S. Sethuraman
Court: Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai
Decided on: Apr-29-2011
The respondent as complainant filed a complaint before the District Forum against the appellant/opposite party praying for the direction to the opposite party to pay Rs.10,000/- for causing mental agony and suffering, to pay Rs.1,750/- with interest at the rate of 24% from 22.4.2001 till the date of realization. The District Forum allowed the complaint, against the said order, this appeal is preferred praying to set aside the order of the District Forum dt.07.11.2007 in C.C.307/2001. This appeal coming before us for hearing finally on 20.04.2011, upon hearing the arguments of the either counsels and perused the documents, as well as the order of the District Forum, this Commission made the following order: M. THANIKACHALAM J, PRESIDENT 1. The opposite party is the appellant. 2. The respondent/complainant purchased a Lex Mark High resolution black print Cartridge from the opposite party on 22.4.2001 for the purpose of using it in his Lex Mark Printer, showing the used Cartridge for ide...
Tag this Judgment!M/S. Hindustan Motors Ltd., Vs. Md.irshad Kamil and Others
Court: Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai
Decided on: Apr-29-2011
The 1st Respondent as complainant filed a complaint before the District Forum against the opposite parties praying for the direction to the opposite parties to pay Rs.5,96,172/- alongwith compensation Rs.25000/-. The District Forum allowed the complaint. Against the said order, this appeal is preferred praying to set aside the order of the District Forum dt.20.05.2008 in CC.No.89/2006. This petition coming before us for hearing finally on 21.04.2011. Upon hearing the arguments of the counsels on both sides, perusing the documents, lower court records, and the order passed by the District Forum, this commission made the following order: M. THANIKACHALAM J, PRESIDENT 1. The 1st opposite party is the appellant. 2. The complainant/1st respondent, had purchased an Ambassador car, by name Avigo, manufactured by the 1st opposite party, from its dealer, the 2nd opposite party, by paying a sum of Rs.5,96,172/-, on 23.8.2005, for which the Registration number was obtained as TN-74 J-7452. At th...
Tag this Judgment!The Sub Postmaster and Another Vs. the Special Officer
Court: Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai
Decided on: Apr-29-2011
The Respondent as complainant filed a complaint before the District Forum, Pudukkottai, alleging deficiency against the opposite parties to pay the maturity value of the 13 Kisan Vikas Patra bearing Nos.48CC 181992 to 181999 dated 21.9.98 at the matured value of Rs.2,60,000/-, to pay at least 12% interest as damages on the maturity value from the date on which it mature till realization, to pay Rs.70,000/- towards mental agony and costs. The District Forum, allowed the complaint against the opposite parties. Against the said order, this appeal is preferred by the opposite parties, praying to set aside the order of the District Forum, Pudukkottai, dated 30.06.08 in C.C.No.20/2006. This appeal coming before us for hearing finally on 15.04.2011, upon hearing the arguments of the counsel on both sides and perused the documents, written submissions as well as the order of the District Forum, this Commission made the following order :- A.K.ANNAMALAI, PRESIDING MEMBER JUDICIAL 1. The opposite...
Tag this Judgment!Alps Industries Ltd., Rep. by Mukul Mittal, Agm-production and Marketi ...
Court: Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai
Decided on: Apr-29-2011
The Respondent / complainant filed a complaint before the District Forum against the opposite parties to pay Rs.1 lakh towards defective flooring materials and for mental agony. The District Forum allowed the complaint, against the said order, this appeal is preferred praying to set aside the order of the District Forum dt.30.08.2007 in C.C.162/2005. This appeal coming before us for hearing finally on 20.04.2011, upon hearing the arguments of the either counsels and perused the documents, as well as the order, of the District Forum, this commission made the following order: M. THANIKACHALAM J, PRESIDENT 1. The opposite parties having failed in their attempt to resist the consumer complaint, brought by the respondent/complainant, have come to this Commission for redressal, challenging the order. 2. The complainant had purchased flooring materials under the brand name BAMVUD manufactured by the first opposite party, marketed through the Agent-second opposite party, after negotiation, p...
Tag this Judgment!The Assistant Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Vs. A.George and ...
Court: Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai
Decided on: Apr-29-2011
The 1st Respondent as complainant filed a complaint before the District Forum, Tirchirappalli, alleging deficiency against the opposite parties to refund the Agricultural E.B.connection charges of Rs.375/- together with an interest from 29.1.04 to the date of Repayment, to pay a compensation to the tune of Rs.50,000/- for having caused acute mental agony, inconvenience, etc., and to pay Rs.2,000/- towards costs. The District Forum, allowed the complaint against the 1st opposite party. Against the said order, this appeal is preferred by the 1st opposite party, praying to set aside the order of the District Forum, Trichirappalli, dated 5.9.08 in O.P.No.139/2006. This appeal coming before us for hearing finally on 27.04.2011, upon hearing the arguments of the counsel on complainant side, and perused the documents, written submissions as well as the order of the District Forum, this Commission made the following order :- A.K.ANNAMALAI, PRESIDING MEMBER JUDICIAL 1. The 1st opposite party is...
Tag this Judgment!The Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Idappadi Vs. Smt. Geetha
Court: Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai
Decided on: Apr-28-2011
The respondent as complainant filed a complaint before the District Forum against the appellant/opposite party praying for the direction to the opposite party to pay a sum of Rs.1 lakh towards deficiency of service, to pay Rs.50,000/- towards mental agony, stress and strain, to pay Rs.5,000/- towards litigation expenses and to pay the cost. The District Forum allowed the complaint, against the said order, this appeal is preferred praying to set aside the order of the District Forum dt.16.10.2007 in C.C.123/2001. This appeal coming before us for hearing finally on 21.04.2011, upon hearing the arguments of the either counsels and perused the documents, as well as the order of the District Forum, this Commission made the following order: M. THANIKACHALAM J, PRESIDENT 1. The opposite party is the appellant. 2. Facts leading to this appeal:- A sum of Rs.6,000/- was deposited in the name of the complainant, in the opposite party bank, while she was a minor on 19.12.79, having the maturity p...
Tag this Judgment!Tmt.S.indira, Principal and Correspondent Vs. Thiru. A.R. Azhaguvel an ...
Court: Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai
Decided on: Apr-28-2011
The Respondents as complainants filed a complaint before the District Forum, Theni, alleging deficiency against the opposite party to issue the Transfer Certificate for the son of the 1st complainant immediately, to repay the fee of Rs.17,335/- paid by the 1st complainant, Rs.5,00,000/- as compensation for compelling the 1st complainant to admit his son in the hostel and Rs.5,00,000/- as compensation for mental agony with Rs.5,000/- as costs and Rs.200/- for each hearing date of this complaint. The District Forum, allowed the complaint against the opposite party. Against the said order, this appeal is preferred by the opposite party, praying to set aside the order of the District Forum, Theni dated 20.12.07 in O.P.No.136/2007. This appeal coming before us for hearing finally on 28.04.2011, upon hearing the arguments of the counsel on both sides, and perused the documents, written submissions as well as the order of the District Forum, this Commission made the following order :- A.K.ANN...
Tag this Judgment!The Manager, Icici Bank Ltd. Vs. R. Yaminee
Court: Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai
Decided on: Apr-28-2011
The respondent as complainant filed a complaint before the District Forum against the appellant/opposite party praying for the direction to the opposite party to refund the excess amount of Rs.1,000/-, to pay a sum of Rs.1 lakh as compensation towards mental agony and to pay Rs.2,000/- towards cost. The District Forum allowed the complaint, against the said order, this appeal is preferred praying to set aside the order of the District Forum dt.19.03.2008 in C.C.762/2004. This appeal coming before us for hearing finally on 15.04.2011, upon hearing the arguments of the either counsels and perused the documents, as well as the order of the District Forum, this Commission made the following order: M. THANIKACHALAM J, PRESIDENT 1. The opposite party is the appellant. 2. Facts necessary to dispose the case: The complainant being the proprietor of Raghav Silk Palace, was having the opposite partys bank Credit Card bearing No.37704011254019, which was used only during emergency. In the month...
Tag this Judgment!M.F.N. Durai, Managing Director, M/S.Fancy International Cars Vs. Mrs. ...
Court: Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai
Decided on: Apr-27-2011
The 1st Respondent as complainant filed a complaint before the District Forum, Coimbatore, alleging deficiency against the opposite parties to pay an advance amount a sum of Rs.30,000/- with interest at 24% p.a. from 21.12.07, to pay a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- towards compensation and damage for mental agony and deficiency of service. The District Forum, allowed the complaint against the opposite parties. Against the said order, this appeal is preferred by the opposite parties, praying to set aside the order of the District Forum, Coimbatore, dated 10.06.08 in O.P.No.59/2008. This appeal coming before us for hearing finally on 27.04.2011, upon hearing the arguments of the counsel on both sides, and perused the documents, written submissions as well as the order of the District Forum, this Commission made the following order :- A.K.ANNAMALAI, PRESIDING MEMBER JUDICIAL 1. The 1st opposite party is the appellant. 2. The complainant/1st respondent filed a complaint against the opposite parties...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »