Chennai Court February 2011 Judgments
The Branch Manager Life Insurance Corporation of India Jeevan Jyothi V ...
Court: Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai
Decided on: Feb-28-2011
The Respondent as complainants filed a complaint before the District Forum against the opposite party praying for the direction to the opposite party to pay Rs.450000/- towards the insurance claim, alongwith 12% interest, and compensation of Rs.4 lakhs and cost of Rs.2000/-. The District Forum allowed the complaint. Against the said order, this appeal is preferred praying to set aside the order of the District Forum dt.14.3.2008 in OP.No.33/2006. This petition coming before us for hearing finally on 24.2.2011. Upon hearing the arguments of the counsels on both sides, perusing the documents, lower court records, and the order passed by the District Forum, this commission made the following order: M. THANIKACHALAM J, PRESIDENT 1. The opposite party is the appellant. 2. The husband of the complainant, by name Shabuddin, had taken two insurance policies for the sum assured Rs.25000/- each. In a fire accident, he died on 23.7.2000. During his period, he has not committed any default, in th...
Tag this Judgment!Williyams Dspensing Chemists and Druggists by Its Proprietor Vs. A. Ve ...
Court: Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai
Decided on: Feb-28-2011
The Respondent as complainant filed a complaint before the District Forum against the opposite party praying for the direction to the opposite party to pay Rs.15000/- alongwith compensation of Rs.20000/- and cost of Rs.5000/-. The District Forum allowed the complaint. Against the said order, this appeal is preferred praying to set aside the order of the District Forum dt.27.3.2008 in CC.No.218/2005. This petition coming before us for hearing finally on 17.2.2011. Upon hearing the arguments of the counsels on both sides, perusing the documents, lower court records, and the order passed by the District Forum, this commission made the following order: M. THANIKACHALAM J, PRESIDENT 1. This appeal, is targeted against the order of the District Forum, in OP.No.218/2005, on the file of District Forum, Chennai (North), wherein a direction has been issued, against the opposite parties, to pay a sum of Rs.25000/-, as compensation, based upon negligent act. 2. The complainant/ respondent, in thi...
Tag this Judgment!Dr. K. Dakshinamoorthy, M.S., Counsultant Surgeon Nagai Hospital Vs. A ...
Court: Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai
Decided on: Feb-28-2011
The 1st Respondent as complainant filed a complaint before the District Forum against the opposite parties praying for the direction to the opposite parties to pay Rs.4,50,000/- towards the loss of life, alongwith compensation Rs.25000/- and cost of Rs.5000/-. The District Forum allowed the complaint. Against the said order, this appeal is preferred praying to set aside the order of the District Forum dt.31.1.2005 in OP.No.73/2001. This petition coming before us for hearing finally on 03.02.2011. Upon hearing the arguments of the counsels on both sides, perusing the documents, lower court records, and the order passed by the District Forum, this commission made the following order: M. THANIKACHALAM J, PRESIDENT 1. The 2nd opposite party, while resisting the claim of the complainant/ 1st respondent, in OP.No.73/2001, on the file of District Forum, Nagapattinam, failed, and the consequence is the appeal. 2. The petitioners husband, by name Elangovan, hereafter after called patient, who ...
Tag this Judgment!The Branch Manager Indian Overseas Bank Chengalpattu Vs. N. Ravikumar
Court: Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai
Decided on: Feb-28-2011
The Respondent as complainant filed a complaint before the District Forum against the opposite party praying for the direction to the opposite party to pay Rs.6000/-, alongwith 25% interest, and compensation of Rs.50,000/-. The District Forum allowed the complaint. Against the said order, this appeal is preferred praying to set aside the order of the District Forum dt.29.8.2008 in OP.No.45/2007. This petition coming before us for hearing finally on 25.2.2011. Upon hearing the arguments of the counsels on both sides, perusing the documents, lower court records, and the order passed by the District Forum, this commission made the following order: M. THANIKACHALAM J, PRESIDENT 1. The opposite party is the appellant. 2. The complainant / respondent, who is having a current account, with the opposite party, deposited a sum of Rs.6000/-, in the said account, which was not properly credited, whereas wrongly credited to someother account. Despite repeated enquiries, and request, though evasiv...
Tag this Judgment!The Chairman-cum-managing Director Food Corporation of India and Anoth ...
Court: Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai
Decided on: Feb-28-2011
The Respondent as complainants filed a complaint before the District Forum against the opposite parties praying for the direction to the opposite parties to pay Rs.7232/- alongwith compensation of Rs.2,00,000/-. The District Forum allowed the complaint. Against the said order, this appeal is preferred praying to set aside the order of the District Forum dt.8.2.2010 in OP.No.246/2009. This petition coming before us for hearing finally on 17.2.2011. Upon hearing the arguments of the counsels on both sides, perusing the documents, lower court records, and the order passed by the District Forum, this commission made the following order: M. THANIKACHALAM J, PRESIDENT 1. This appeal, by the opposite parties, aims to set aside the order of the District Forum dt.8.2.2010, wherein a direction has been issued to refund a sum of Rs.7232/-, in addition to pay a sum of Rs.25000/- towards compensation for mental agony, alongwith cost of Rs.5000/-, which is based upon deficiency in service, as per t...
Tag this Judgment!The Branch Manager, the New India Assurance Co. Ltd., and Another Vs. ...
Court: Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai
Decided on: Feb-28-2011
The respondent as complainant filed a complaint before the District Forum against the appellants/opposite parties praying for the direction to the opposite parties to pay Rs.2 lakhs towards Janata Personal Accident Policy, to pay Rs.1 lakh for mental agony and distress and to pay Rs.2,000/- towards cost. The District Forum allowed the complaint, against the said order, this appeal is preferred praying to set aside the order of the District Forum dt.27.03.2008 in C.C.69/2007. This appeal coming before us for hearing finally on 22.02.2011, upon hearing the arguments of the either counsels and perused the documents, as well as the order of the District Forum, this Commission made the following order: M. THANIKACHALAM J, PRESIDENT 1. This appeal is targeted against the order of the District Forum in C.C.69/2007, on the file of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Salem, wherein, the opposite parties/appellants are directed to pay a sum of Rs.2,,50,000/- along with cost, being t...
Tag this Judgment!B.Jaya, W/O.V.Balasubramanian and Another Vs. the Sub Registrar, Worai ...
Court: Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai
Decided on: Feb-28-2011
The Appellants as complainants filed a complaint before the District Forum, Trichy, alleging deficiency against the opposite parties to pay a sum of Rs.10,000/- for the legal expenses met out due to the deficiency of service and Rs.2,000/- for registration charges, stamp, etc., and Rs.2,00,000/- towards the loss sustained in the business because of the deficiency of service by the opposite parties and to pay a sum of Rs.3,00,000/- each as compensation from the 2nd opposite party for his deficiency of service and Rs.5,000/- as cost. The District Forum, dismissed the complaint against the opposite parties. Against the said order, this appeal is preferred praying to set aside the order of the District Forum, Trichy, dt.05.08.2008 in CC.No.121/2007. This appeal coming before us for hearing finally on 11.02.2011, upon hearing the arguments of the counsels on appellants side, and perused the documents, written submissions as well as the order of the District Forum, this Commission made the f...
Tag this Judgment!The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Vs. S. Shanthilal Balchand
Court: Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai
Decided on: Feb-28-2011
The respondent as complainant filed a complaint before the District Forum against the appellant/opposite party praying for the direction to the opposite party to pay Rs.11,052.65 towards the mediclaim, to pay the cumulative bonus for the period covering 8.7.2003 to 24.7.2005, to pay Rs.75,000/- towards the compensation for mental agony and to pay Rs.5,000/- towards cost. The District Forum allowed the complaint, against the said order, this appeal is preferred praying to set aside the order of the District Forum dt.24.06.2008 in C.C.9/2007. This appeal coming before us for hearing finally on 23.02.2011, upon hearing the arguments of the either counsels and perused the documents, as well as the order of the District Forum, this Commission made the following order: M. THANIKACHALAM J, PRESIDENT 1. The opposite party is appellant. 2. The complainant/respondent based upon the mediclaim insurance policy, issued by the opposite party to the complainant and his family members, lodged a clai...
Tag this Judgment!Mrs. M. Tamilkodi Vs. the Manager, Canara Bank
Court: Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai
Decided on: Feb-28-2011
The appellant as complainant filed a complaint before the District Forum against the respondent/opposite party praying for the direction to the opposite party to pay Rs.2 lakhs as compensation for mental agony, to pay Rs.21,000/- towards two cheques and to pay Rs.5,000/- towards expenses. The District Forum allowed the complaint, against the said order, this appeal is preferred praying to set aside the order of the District Forum dt.15.12.2008 in C.C.287/2007. This appeal coming before us for hearing finally on 22.02.2011, upon hearing the arguments of the appellant in person and counsel for respondent and perused the documents, as well as the order of the District Forum, this Commission made the following order: M. THANIKACHALAM J, PRESIDENT 1. The complainant having failed in her attempt before the District Forum to get any relief, has come before this Commission as appellant, for redressal. 2. The complainant/appellant was maintaining a savings bank account with the opposite party...
Tag this Judgment!Tamilnadu Industrial Co-op. Bank Ltd., Rep. by Its Branch Manager Vs. ...
Court: Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai
Decided on: Feb-28-2011
The 1st Respondent as complainant filed a complaint before the District Forum, Chennai(South), alleging deficiency against the opposite parties to pay Rs.50,000/- being the mediclaim policy claim value and Rs.5,00,000/- for mental agony due to deficient service. The District Forum, allowed the complaint against the 1st opposite party. Against the said order, this appeal is preferred by the 1st opposite party praying to set aside the order of the District Forum, Chennai (South), dt.31.12.2007 in CC.No.254/2004. This appeal coming before us for hearing finally on 11.02.2011, upon hearing the arguments of the counsel on both sides, and perused the documents, written submissions as well as the order of the District Forum, this Commission made the following order :- A.K.ANNAMALAI, PRESIDING MEMBER JUDICIAL 1. 1st opposite party is the appellant. 2. The complainant/1st respondent filed a complaint before the District Forum against the appellant and 2nd opposite party for the direction to pay...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »