Chennai Court August 2010 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
A.M.Chinnarajan. Vs. the Special Commissioner and Commissioner of Land ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-19-2010
1. Heard the counsels appearing on behalf of the petitioner, as well as the respondents.2. The petitioner had stated that he is the absolute owner of the property in S.No.136/1 of Ikkarainegamman Village. A Well is situated in the petitioners land in S.F.No.250/3C of Ikkarainegamman Village. The water from the said Well is being used for agricultural purposes. A Track Rent Permit had been granted to the petitioner, by the authority concerned, to draw water from the Well, which is situated close to the Bhavani river, permitting the petitioner to use the percolated water from the Well, for agricultural purposes. The petitioner has been paying, periodically, the track rent, the water cess and the kist due from her. The petitioner had also been directed to pay an one time water cess, for the usage of the water percolated in the Well in question, from the Bhavani river.3. It had also been stated that the petitioner has been using the water from the Well in question, without violating the te...
E. Manikandan. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by Its Secretary, Home De ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-19-2010
1. This habeas corpus petition is brought forth by the petitioner for a direction to the respondents to treat his subsequent life sentence passed in S.C. No.206 of 2003 by the Additional District and Sessions Court (Fast Track Court), Vellore by its judgment dated 27.10.2004 and subsequently affirmed by this Court in C.A. No.597 of 2005 by its judgment dated 11.6.2007 as concurrent with the imprisonment of life passed in S.C. No.176 of 2002 passed by the Principal Sessions Judge, Vellore by its judgment dated 17.7.2003 which was subsequently affirmed by this Court made in C.A. No.1856 of 2003 by its judgment dated 10.7.2006. 2. Affidavit filed in support of the petition is perused. The Court heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and also the respondent-State. 3. As could be seen from the available materials and the averments made in the affidavit and also considering the submissions made by either side, it is noticed that the petitioner, who stood charged, tried along ...
Malarvizhi, and ors. Vs. the Special Commissioner and Commissioner of ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-19-2010
1. Heard the counsels appearing on behalf of the petitioners, as well as the respondents.2. The petitioners had stated that they are the absolute owners of the property in S.No.394/2A1B of Ikkarai Thathapalli Village, Sathyamangalam Taluk. A Well is situated in the petitioners land in S.F.Nos.224/1, 2, 3, 4 and 219/3, 4 of Ikkarai Thathapalli Village. The water from the said Well is being used for agricultural purposes. A Track Rent permit had been granted to the petitioners, by the authority concerned, to draw water from the Well, which is situated close to the Bhavani river, permitting the petitioners to use the percolated water from the Well, for agricultural purposes. The petitioners have been paying, periodically, the track rent, the water cess and the kist due from them. The petitioners had also been directed to pay an one time water cess, for the usage of the water percolated in the Well in question, from the Bhavani river.3. It had also been stated that the petitioners have bee...
K.Arumugam. Vs. the Special Commissioner and Commissioner of Land Admi ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-19-2010
1. Heard the counsels appearing on behalf of the petitioner, as well as the respondents.2. The petitioner had stated that he is the absolute owner of the property in S.No.195/1 to 3 of Ikkaraithathapalli Village. A Well is situated in the petitioners land in S.F.No.176/4B of Ikkaraithathapalli Village. The water from the said Well is being used for agricultural purposes. A Track Rent permit had been granted to the petitioner, by the authority concerned, to draw water from the Well, which is situated close to the Bhavani river, permitting the petitioner to use the percolated water from the Well, for agricultural purposes. The petitioner has been paying, periodically, the track rent, the water cess and the kist due from her. The petitioner had also been directed to pay an one time water cess, for the usage of the water percolated in the Well in question, from the Bhavani river.3. It had also been stated that the petitioner has been using the water from the Well in question, without viola...
K.N.Chinnaraj, and ors. Vs. the Special Commissioner and Commissioner ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-19-2010
1. Heard the counsels appearing on behalf of the petitioners, as well as the respondents.2. The petitioners had stated that they are the absolute owners of the property in S.F.No.319/10A1A3 of Ikkarai Thathapalli Village. A Well is situated in the petitioners land in S.Nos.98/2, 43/2, 42/2, 49/2 and 33/2. The water from the said Well is being used for agricultural purposes. A Track Rent permit had been granted to the petitioners, by the authority concerned, to draw water from the Well, which is situated close to the Bhavani river, permitting the petitioners to use the percolated water from the Well, for agricultural purposes. The petitioners have been paying, periodically, the track rent, the water cess and the kist due from them. The petitioners had also been directed to pay an one time water cess, for the usage of the water percolated in the Well in question, from the Bhavani river.3. It had also been stated that the petitioners have been using the water from the Well in question, wi...
K.M.Aruchamy. Vs. the Special Commissioner and Commissi.Oner of Land A ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-19-2010
1. The Petitioner/Appellant/Defendant has projected this Appeal A.S.No.607 of 2010 before this Court as against the Judgment and Decree dated 05.08.2009 in O.S.No.887 of 2004 passed by the Learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.III, Coimbatore. 2.It is not in dispute that the Respondent/Plaintiff has succeeded before the trial Court and from the perusal of the Judgment passed by the trial Court in O.S.No.887 of 2004 it transpires that the trial Court has come to a resultant conclusion that Ex.A.1 Sale Agreement dated 14.04.2002 is true, genuine and valid document entered into between the Respondent/Plaintiff and the Appellant/Defendant and further, it has opined that the Appellant/Defendant has committed a breach of contract of sale and consequently, it granted the relief of specific performance in favor of the Respondent/Defendant. 3.The Learned Counsel for the Appellant/Defendant urges before this Court that the Respondent/Plaintiff on the strength of Dec...
Elumalai, and anr. Vs. State Represented by Inspector of Police Vazhav ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-19-2010
1. This appeal challenges a judgment of the Principal Sessions Division, Villupuram, made in S.C.No.253 of 2007 whereby these appellants, who were shown as A-1 and A-2 respectively, along with A-3 and A-4 stood charged, tried, found guilty and awarded punishment as follows: ACCUSEDCHARGE FINDING PUNISHMENTA-1 & A-2302 IPCGuiltyLife imprisonment with a fine of Rs.5000/- and default sentenceA-1 to A-3324 IPCGuilty2 years RI with a fine of Rs.5000/- and default sentenceA-1 & A-4294(b) IPCNot guilty AcquittedA-4323 IPC (2 counts)Guilty6 months SI with a fine of Rs.2000/- and default sentenceA-3 and A-4302 r/w 34 IPCGuiltyLife imprisonment with a fine of Rs.5000/- and default sentence2.Short facts necessary for the disposal of this appeal can be stated as follows:(a) P.W.1 is a native of Mettupalayam Village. P.W.2 is his mother, while P.W.3 is his sister. The deceased Chinnathambi was the father of P.Ws.1 and 3 and the husband of P.W.2. There were landed properties, motor pump set and coco...
K.Rathinasamy, and ors. Vs. the Special Commissioner and Commissioner ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-19-2010
1. Heard the counsels appearing on behalf of the petitioners, as well as the respondents.2. The petitioners had stated that they are the absolute owners of the property in S.Nos.129/4, 235/2, 235/4 and 235/5 of Ariyappampalayam Village. A Well is situated in the petitioners land in S.F.No.118/2C2 of Ariyappampalayam Village. The water from the said Well is being used for agricultural purposes. A Track Rent permit had been granted to the petitioners, by the authority concerned, to draw water from the Well, which is situated close to the Bhavani river, permitting the petitioners to use the percolated water from the Well, for agricultural purposes. The petitioners have been paying, periodically, the track rent, the water cess and the kist due from them. The petitioners had also been directed to pay an one time water cess, for the usage of the water percolated in the Well in question, from the Bhavani river.3. It had also been stated that the petitioners have been using the water from the ...
S.L.Lingannan, and anr. Vs. the Special Commissioner and Commissioner ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-19-2010
1. Heard the counsels appearing on behalf of the petitioners, as well as the respondents.2. The petitioners had stated that they are the absolute owners of the property in S.Nos.200/1, 363/2, 194/1 and 194/6 of Sathyamangalam Village. A Well is situated in the petitioners land in S.F.Nos.425/3A2, A3 in Sathyamangalam Village. The water from the said Well is being used for agricultural purposes. A Track Rent permit had been granted to the petitioners, by the authority concerned, to draw water from the Well, which is situated close to the Bhavani river, permitting the petitioners to use the percolated water from the Well, for agricultural purposes. The petitioners have been paying, periodically, the track rent, the water cuss and the Kist due from them. The petitioners had also been directed to pay an one time water cess, for the usage of the water percolated in the Well in question, from the Bhavani river.3. It had also been stated that the petitioners have been using the water from the...
P.L.Sivanappan, and ors. Vs. the Special Commissioner and Commissioner ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-19-2010
1. Heard the counsels appearing on behalf of the petitioners, as well as the respondents.2. The petitioners had stated that they are the absolute owners of the property in S.Nos.114/1, 154, 163/1, 163/5, 112/1, 113/1, 1162/2A, 167/3 and 176 of Pudubeerkadavu Village. A Well is situated in the petitioners land in S.F.No.124/3B in Kothamangalam Village. The water from the said Well is being used for agricultural purposes. A Track Rent permit had been granted to the petitioners, by the authority concerned, to draw water from the Well, which is situated close to the Bhavani river, permitting the petitioners to use the percolated water from the Well, for agricultural purposes. The petitioners have been paying, periodically, the track rent, the water cess and the kist due from them. The petitioners had also been directed to pay an one time water cess, for the usage of the water percolated in the Well in question, from the Bhavani river.3. It had also been stated that the petitioners have bee...
- ‹ Prev
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- Next ›
- Last »