Chennai Court July 2010 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Cce, Tirunelveli Vs. Shri. R. Valathi Raja
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai
Decided on: Jul-14-2010
The respondents are not present. Heard Shri C.Rangaraju, SDR, appearing for the department. The department is in appeal on the ground that the lower appellate authority has upheld the penalties imposed under Section 77 and Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, but has set aside the penalty under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994. I am of the view that the impugned order does not require any interference in view of a number of decisions of the Tribunal holding that one of the penalties imposed under Section 76 or under Section 78, is sufficient keeping in view the subsequent amendment to the law making these penalties mutually exclusive. As such, the department’s appeal is rejected....
Cce, Salem Vs. M/S. Agni Steels Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai
Decided on: Jul-14-2010
Heard both sides. I find that the impugned order has been passed by the lower appellate authority granting capital goods credit in respect of the impugned goods holding the same to be material handling equipment by following the decision of the Larger Bench of the Tribunal. As such, the impugned order requires no interference. Consequently, the department’s appeal is dismissed. 2. The cross-objection filed by the respondents also stands disposed of....
Cc (Air) Chennai Vs. M/S. Ucal Fuel Systems Ltd.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai
Decided on: Jul-14-2010
Heard both sides. I find that a proper appeal was filed before the lower appellate authority with a correct authorization referring to the grounds of appeal. However, the lower appellate authority has dismissed the appeal of the department giving frivolous reasons. Hence, the order passed by him cannot be sustained. The same is set aside and the matter is remitted back to the lower appellate authority for a fresh decision on merits. He shall pass fresh orders in accordance with law after granting an adequate opportunity of hearing to both sides. The department’s appeal is allowed by way of remand....
Dr.G.Sureshkumar .. Vs. the Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission, and ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-13-2010
1. The prayer in the writ petition is to quash the Notification dated 01.07.2005 issued by the first respondent insofar as Note No.(vii) "3% reservation for physically handicapped persons will not apply to this recruitment" and consequently direct the respondents to follow reservation for persons with disability and the recruitment in the post of Assistant Surgeon (General) and Assistant Surgeon (Speciality) notified under the said advertisement and consider the case of the petitioner under reservation for persons with locomotor disability or cerebral palsy as per the provisions of the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 and recruit the petitioner to one post under such reservation. 2.The case of the petitioner is that the first respondent issued Notification/Advertisement No.067 for recruitment of 1295 Assistant Surgeons (General) and 530 Assistant Surgeons (Speciality) in the State of Tamil Nadu by prescribing the qua...
A.Shanmugam .. Vs. the State of Tamilnadu, and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-13-2010
1. On consent, this writ petition is taken up for final hearing.2. The writ petition is filed against the promotion order passed by the third respondent on 26.08.2009 and consequential relieving order passed by the 5th respondent on 06.09.2009 in so far as it relates to the petitioner and to quash the same and to direct the respondents to permit the petitioner to continue as selection grade Village Administrative Officer, Bosi Nayakena Halli Village, Pappyreddypatti Taluk, Dharmapuri District with all consequential monetary and other service benefits.3. The petitioner was selected and appointed as Village Administrative Officer on 26.12.1987 and he was granted selection grade in the same post during 1998. The post of selection grade Village Administrative Officer (hereinafter referred to V.A.O.) is equivalent to the post of Junior Assistant and both the posts are feeder category for the next promotional post as Assistant. The petitioner has through his representation dated 02.11.2007 a...
Mohana .. Vs. State Rep.by Inspector of Police.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-13-2010
1. The challenge in this appeal is to the Judgment dated 10.05.2006 made in SC.No.113/2005 passed by the learned I Additional District Judge, Full Additional Charge, Mahila Court, Salem, convicting the appellant who is arrayed as A2 for the offence u/s.306 IPC and sentencing her to undergo 5 years rigorous imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.500/- and in default to undergo 4 months rigorous imprisonment. 2.There are 2 accused in this case, viz., A1 and A2 and the learned Trial Judge, disbelieving the prosecution case, acquitted A1 and convicted A2 as stated bove.3. The background facts of the case are here under:-[a] A1 and the deceased Jayabharathi got married on 09.03.2000. A2 is the sister of A1. After marriage, A1 and the deceased were living with A2 at Nehru Nagar, Perumalaikoodal. Out of the wedlock of A1 and the deceased, a female child was born. P.Ws.1, 8 & 9 are the brother, father and the mother of the deceased respectively. At the time of marriage, the deceased was given go...
S.Angamuthu ... Vs. the Superintendent of Police, and anr.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-13-2010
1. By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for disposal.2.The petitioner has joined the Police Force as Grade-II Police Constable on 12.09.1986 and thereafter promoted as Grade-I Police Constable on 22.07.1997 and further as Head Constable on 22.07.2002. An order of transfer was passed against the petitioner on administrative ground by the Inspector General of Police in and by his proceedings dated 20.03.2008. The said order was communicated to the petitioner by the 1st respondent dated 26.03.2008. Challenging the order dated 26.03.2008, the petitioner has filed the present writ petition. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the impugned order is one without authority and therefore the same is liable to the set aside as without jurisdiction. According to the learned counsel, it is only the Director General of Police who is the competent authority to transfer the petitioner. 4.A Counter affidavit has been filed by the respondents stating that as per the Gover...
P.M.R.institute of Technology. Vs. the All India Council for Technical ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-13-2010
1. On consent, this writ petition is taken up for final hearing.2. The writ petition is filed challenging the order of the first respondent/AICTE dated 01.04.2010 in File No. 730-52-382(E)/ET/99 and to quash the same with direction issued to the first respondent to grant extension of approval to the petitioner's college beyond the academic year 2009-2010.3. The petitioner institution was established during 2008 with the approval granted by the first respondent/AICTE for the period 2008-2010 i.e. for the academic years 2008-2009 and 2009-2010. After getting the approval from the first respondent, the petitioner institution applied to the third respondent university for affiliation for the academic year 2008-2009 and the same was duly granted.4. The petitioner institute has on the strength of approval and affiliation granted by the respondents 1 and 3, admitted its first batch of students. After the completion of academic year 2008-2009, the petitioner applied to the third respondent for...
Sunil Kumar ... Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu Rep by the Secretary, and ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-13-2010
1. In the year 1970, one Vijayaragam was assigned land at Alapakkam, Chengalpattu Taluk, Kancheepuram District. However, the assignment was cancelled in the year 1975. Without disclosing the cancellation of assignment, the said Vijayaragam sold the land to Nagalakshmi in the year 1983. The petitioner's father entered into an agreement of sale on 15.07.1995 with the said Nagalakshmi with relation to the aforesaid property. The petitioner's father was not aware about the cancellation of assignment, when he entered into an agreement with Nagalakshmi. When Nagalakshmi failed to execute the sale deed, the petitioner's father filed a suit in O.S.No.54 of 1997 before the Additional Sub-Judge, Chengalpattu for specific performance of the agreement of the sale deed dated 15.07.1995. The said suit was decreed on 31.07.1998.2.The petitioner's father died on 05.07.1999 leaving behind the petitioner, his mother, his brothers and sister as legal heirs. The legal heirs of the petitioner's father file...
T.R.Natanakumar ... Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by Its Secretary ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-13-2010
1. The petitioner, while serving as Inspector of Police, suffered a punishment of reduction in time scale of pay by one stage for one year, by order dated 30.07.99. Aggrieved by the said order of punishment, the petitioner preferred an appeal and the same was also dismissed. As against that order, the present Original Application has been filed.2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that though the petitioner suffered the punishment for an incident that took place in the year 1989, any punishment awarded should not be taken into consideration, while considering the delinquent for promotion, if the incident had taken place 5 years prior to the date of order of punishment (and only the disciplinary proceedings were pending on the date of drawal of the promotion panel). In his further submission, he has also relied upon the norms adopted in the meeting held on 03.04.96. In the said norms, Clause 2 states that any punishment ordered within a period of five years as on the ...
- ‹ Prev
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- Next ›
- Last »