Chennai Court October 2010 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mrs.C.T. Rani. Vs. Crl.O.P.No.6169 of 2010 and M.P.No.1 of 2010
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-01-2010
1. The petition is filed seeking a direction to call for the records in C.C.No.16 of 2010 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvottiyur and quash the same.2. The petitioner has been charged for offences punishable under Sec.341, 294-b, 332 and 355 IPC. This is a peculiar case of the prosecution against a woman of aged 39 years, who travelled along with her two children from Periyar Nagar Bus Stand to Chindadripet in the bus Route No.28 of the Madras Transport Corporation. The complainant is the conductor who was on duty and according to him, on 9.1.2010, around 7.10 p.m, the petitioner and her children boarded the bus he asked for the tickets; she tendered a hundred rupees note and asked for only one ticket. When the conductor asked her to take tickets for the children also, she refused and demanded only one ticket. Therefore, the conductor promptly told her to get down at the next bus stop, since she was not willing to take three tickets. However, according to the cond...
M.Kannan. Vs. the Director of School Education, and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-01-2010
1. Heard Mr.S.Selvathirumurugan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms.C.Devi, learned Government Advocate for the respondents.2. The petitioner was appointed as single part-time vocational teacher in R.S. Government Higher Secondary School. His appointment was approved with effect from 01.12.1992 by the third respondent by an order dated 05.07.1993.3. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner possessed qualification for appointment to the post of vocational teacher.4. The Government issued G.O.Ms.No.834, Education, Science and Technology (HS.II) Department, dated 23.09.1994 and also issued G.O.Ms.No.358, Elementary Education Department, dated 18.08.1997 appointing the part-time vocational teachers as Secondary Grade Teachers, even if they did not possess qualification, by sending them for training.5. The Government also issued another G.O.Ms.No.680, Education, Science and Technology (VE) Department, dated 20.09.1996 approving the appointments of fully qua...
National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Paranthaman Rep by Father and Next ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-01-2010
1. C.M.A.No.3103 of 2003 arises out of the award passed in MCOP No.911 of 2002 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Subordinate Judge), Kancheepuram awarding compensation of Rs.26,00,000.00 to the parents for the death of their son Narasimhan in a road accident.2. C.M.A.No.3102 of 2003 arises out of the award passed in MCOP No.910 of 2002 on the file of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Subordinate Judge), Kancheepuram awarding compensation of Rs.25,02,320.00 for the injuries sustained by the 1st respondent/claimant. Since both the appeals arise out of common award and points for determination are one and the same, both the appeals were heard together and shall stand disposed of by this common judgment.3. On 21.4.1995, at 10.20 p.m, in Thiruvengadasami Road, Coimbatore Town, the injured claimant G.G. Paranthaman and another person by name Prabhuram were travelling in their car. The car was driven by the deceased Narasimhan. When the car was proceeding in Thiruvengadasami ro...
J.Maradee Free Trade Zone Private Ltd. Vs. the Tahsildar, Office of Ta ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-01-2010
1. All three writ petitions are filed to set aside the order of the first respondent dated 31.08.2009 in and under which he has ordered transfer of patta in respect of survey numbers in question.2. As all the three writ petitions are against the same order and are for identical relief, though based on slightly different set of facts, all the three writ petitions are being disposed of by common order.3. The brief facts relevant herein are set out as follows:(i) The petitioners in all the three writ petitions claim to be the purchasers of different extent of land in different survey numbers purchased either from the 3rd respondent or from the co-owners of the lands in question as per the registered sale deeds particulars of which are furnished in the writ petition affidavits. (ii) The 3rd respondent in all the three writ petitions Munusamy Naicker filed suit for partition in O.S.No.14 of 1991 on the file of Sub Judge, Tiruvallur against Adhilakshsmiammal and others for partition and sepa...
M/S.Sathya Foundations Private, and ors. Vs. Indbank Housing Limited, ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-01-2010
1. The first petitioner company is a builder and with a view to develop a housing project in the lands measuring about 78 cents at S.No.166/3B3, Kovilambakkam Panchayat, Tambaram Taluk, Chennai, the petitioners have approached the first respondent Bank and obtained a project loan of Rs.40 lakhs on 12.8.1995 for the construction and as security for the loan, the land owners S.Lakshmanan and S.Ramachandran have deposited the title deeds of the property with the first respondent Bank. The project site has been named as 'Sathya Gardens' and the cost of the total project was Rs.1.50 crores, even though it was shown as Rs.88.34 lakhs in the loan proposal submitted to the first respondent Bank. Thereafter, as per the petitioners, since the Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board sought to acquire the lands immediately abutting the land which was being developed by them, the proposed purchasers panicked and stopped making the payment towards the purchase of flats and hence the project came to a stands...
R. Joseph MirandA. Vs. Dhandapani Finance Private Limited.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-01-2010
1. This appeal is filed by the borrower challenging the order dated 18.11.2009 in Application No. 6129 of 2009 passed by the learned single Judge appointing an advocate commissioner to seize the vehicle Manitowac Truck Mounted Crame bearing Registration No. TN 59 AH 6711, with Engine No. 84261900 and Chasis No. T52937.2. The learned senior counsel for the appellant would contend that the appellant has executed a loan agreement on 31.01.2008 for purchase of Manitowac Truck Mounted Crame 1995 model telescopic mobile crane with the first respondent. Based on the said agreement, the first respondent has advanced a loan of Rs.30 lakhs to the appellant after securing a promisory note and irrecovable power of attorney in favour of the first respondent. The second respondent stood as a guarantor for the due repayment of loan by the appellant. As per the agreement, the appellant has to pay the loan amount in equated monthly instalments for which the appellant has also issued post dated cheque i...
S.P. Velayutham. Vs. the Deputy Superintendent of Police.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-01-2010
1. The petition in Crl.O.P.No.8711 of 2010 is filed seeking a direction to call for the records and quash the proceedings in C.C.No.1859 of 2010, pending on the file of the learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai for alleged offence punishable under Secs.419, 420 and 120-B r/w 420 and 409 IPC.2. The petition in Crl.O.P.No.21428 of 2010 is filed seeking to return the passport of the petitioner bearing No.F2889377 seized during investigation in C.C.No.1859 of 2010 pending on the file of the learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai.3. The petitioner and four others were charged for an offence punishable under Sec.120-B, 419, 409 and 420 IPC. The 2nd respondent preferred a complaint alleging that the petitioner and four others had received a sum of Rs.171,11,11,111/- ( Rupees One hundred and seventy one crores eleven lakhs, eleven thousand and hundred and eleven) towards real estate transaction with regard to properties which had defective...
Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation Ltd., Vs. Minor.B.Senthil Kumara ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-01-2010
1. The above Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed by the appellant/second respondent against the Award and Decree, dated 05.01.2006, made in M.C.O.P.No.108 of 2005, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, II Additional Sub Court, Erode, awarding a compensation of Rs.93,200/- together with 7.5% interest per annum, from the date of filing petition till the date of payment of compensation. 2.Aggrieved by the said Award and Decree, the appellant/second respondent has filed the above appeal praying to scale down the award and decree passed by the Tribunal. 3.The short facts of the case are as follows:On 04.01.2004, at about 06.45 p.m. the petitioner was walking on the Erode to Arachalur road, near Avalpondurai bus stop, on the left side of the road, and at that time, the first respondent drove the second respondent Corporation bus bearing registration No.TN33 N1356 in a rash and negligent manner with an uncontrollable speed from north to south and dashed against the petition...
The Manager United India Insurance Co., Ltd., Vs. Mythili, and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-01-2010
1. The above Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed by the appellant/second respondent against the Award and Decree, dated 31.03.2003, made in M.C.O.P.No.511 of 2002, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Sub-Ordinate Court, Thiruvallur, awarding a compensation of Rs.12,17,000/- together with 9% interest per annum, from the date of filing petition till the date of payment of compensation. 2. Aggrieved by the said Award and Decree, the appellant/second respondent has filed the above appeal praying to scale down the award and decree passed by the Tribunal.3. The short facts of the case are as follows:on 17.02.2002, at about 05.30 p.m. the deceased D.Simson was standing with his friend in G.N.T.road, Athipedu bus stand, at that time the first respondent's Swaraj Mazda Mini Lorry bearing registration No.TAC7177, coming from north to south, in a rash and negligent manner by its driver dashed against the deceased and caused his death. The accident had occurred only due to the...