Chennai Court April 2009 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
C.K.G. Nathan Vs. the Assistant Commandant Central Industrial Security ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-01-2009
Reported in: (2009)5MLJ1121
ORDERD. Murugesan, J.1. The petitioner was appointed to the Central Industrial Security Force during the year 1990 as a Constable. He was issued with a charge memo dated 9.1.2007 containing the following charges:(1) Gross misconduct and negligence in that No. 914440095 Constable C.K.G.Nathan of CISF Unit CPCL Manali was detailed for 'A' shift duty from 0500 hrs to 1300 hrs on 12.12.2006 at West Gate-II in checking Rifle failed to take care of his duty area due to which unclaimed amount of Rs. 485/- recovered from his area of responsibility by a team while raiding the area at about 1235 hrs on 12.12.06. Hence the charge.(2) Gross misconduct, in that No. 914440095 Constable C.K.G.Nathan of CISF Unit CPCL Manali discarded the rifle issued to him without properly handing over it and intentionally ignored to change the rifle duty as per the instructions at West Gate-II on 12.12.2006. Hence the charge.By explanation dated 19.1.2007, he disputed the charges. In spite of such denial, the Assis...
K. Murugesan Vs. E. Ulaganathan and anr.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-01-2009
Reported in: AIR2009Mad169
ORDERS. Palanivelu, J.1. No appearance for the respondents. Hence, the matter is taken up for final hearing.2. The petitioner is the seventh defendant in O.S. No. 154 of 2008 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Mettur. The first respondent has filed a suit on pro-note for a sum of Rs. 94,750/-. Along with the suit, he also filed an application under Order 38 Rule 5 read with Section 151 Civil Procedure Code, for an order of attachment before judgment of the retiral benefits of this petitioner to the tune of Rs. 1,00.000/-.3. At the outset, the Court below passed an order, directing notice to furnish security by this petitioner. This petitioner remained absent and was set ex parte by the Court below on 16.06.2008. On 23.06.2008, the trial Court passed an order, directing attachment of the retirement benefits of this petitioner by 25.07.2008 and the same was also effected. On 25.07.2008, the attachment was made absolute and the Interlocutory Application was closed. It is this order...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Next ›