Chennai Court April 2006 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
R. Kalimuthu Vs. the Management, Marlboro Engineering Works
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-03-2006
Reported in: 2006(2)CTC822; (2006)3MLJ27
ORDERP.P.S. Janarthana Raja, J.1. The respondent is a small scale industry engaged in the manufacture and marketing of pumpsets. It has a branch at Indore. The petitioner was appointed as a Branch Manager at Indore Branch of the respondent's concern. The petitioner was the sole incharge of the Branch and he was looking after the day to day administration. The duties of the petitioner were assigning work to the sales and administrative staffs employed under him, supervising their work and sanctioning leave etc. The petitioner was incharge of the Branch cash transactions and he also used to prepare periodical statements, debtors list and send the same to the respondent from time to time and also do all incidental administrative work. He was holding a responsible post as a Branch Manager, using the powers conferred on him. As there was some complaint against the petitioner , the respondent required him to come to Coimbatore for certain clarifications during May 2000. Because of some misun...
S.K. Manikandan and E. Charles Vs. Saint Michael's Polytechnic College ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-03-2006
Reported in: (2006)3MLJ52
ORDERD. Murugesan, J.1. As the issues raised in both the writ petitions are one and the same, they are taken up together for disposal.2. The averments made in the affidavits are as under:-Both the petitioners are the students of St.Michael's Polytechnic College, Vellanur, Avadi undergoing the second year course in Electronics Communication Engineering and Automobile Engineering respectively. According to the petitioners, even during the college hours, the third year students of the college obstructed the petitioners' entry into the college and they were subjected to ragging. On 1.12.2005 at about 9.00 a.m., when both the petitioners entered into the college premises, the senior students threatened them and their classmates and forcibly took them to the toilet and manhandled. The petitioners immediately made a complaint to the Administrative Officer of the college and the Administrative Officer informed the petitioners that the college is not in a position to take action against the sen...
State Vs. Shanthi
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-03-2006
Reported in: 2006CriLJ3082
K.N. Basha, J.1. Crl. M.P. No. 2050 of 2006 in Crl. A. No. 524 of 2005 has filed by the State through the Inspector of Police, Erode Taluk Police Station, Erode, with a prayer to allow the prosecution to take additional evidence under Section 391 of Code of Criminal Procedure to mark the information which was reduced into writing in Volume III of general diary maintained by the Inspector of Police, Erode Taluk Police Station, Erode, in Crime No. 126 of 2004 and in Crl. A. No. 524 of 2006 pending before this Court.2. The accused in this case has come forward with an appeal against conviction as he has been convicted under Section 8(c) read with 20(b)(ii)(c) of N.D.P.S. Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') and sentenced to undergo ten years rigorous imprisonment and to pay an amount of Rs. 1,00,000/- fine, in default, to undergo one year rigorous imprisonment. This appeal is posted before this Court for final hearing. At this stage, the State has preferred a petition, as stated abo...
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›