Chennai Court March 2006 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Indian Mri Diagnostic and Research Centre Vs. the Customs, Excise and ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-01-2006
Reported in: 2006(200)ELT197(Mad)
ORDERS: (1)The Board may, of its own motion, all for and examined the record of any proceeding in which a Commissioner of Customs as an adjudicating authority has passed any decision or order under this Act for the purpose of satisfying itself as to the legality or propriety of any such decision or order and may, by order, direct such Commissioner to apply to the Appellate Tribunal for the determination of such points arising out of the decision or order as may be specified by the Boards in its order. 5.3. No doubt a show cause notice for initiating the confiscation proceedings was initiated on 6.3.1998, which ultimately ended in a redemption proceedings dated 24.8.1998, against which, the appellant has preferred an appeal under Section 112(a) of the Act before the CESTAT, which was dismissed by an order dated 5.8.2003. But, within the period of six months from 6.3.1998, the Board has initiated proceedings under Section 129D on 2.8.1999, well within the period of limitation. 5.4. It is...
R. Jaivel, the President, Mettupatti Multi Purpose Worker's Industrial ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-01-2006
Reported in: AIR2006Mad215; 2006(2)CTC709; (2006)2MLJ67
ORDERS.R. Singharavelu, J.1. Revision petitioner is the Ex-President of Mettupadti Multi-Purpose Worker's Industrial Cooperative Society, against whom there was an award dated 31.03.1999 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Vellore; that award was based for the failure on the part of the revision petitioner in the capacity of the President of the Society to comply with the contract between the Society and the respondent-State of Tamil Nadu, represented by the Superintending Engineer, P.W.D., Tank Modernisation Circle, Vellore. That contract was entered into between them for manufacturing of paddle shutters by the Cooperative Society and for delivery to the Superintending Engineer, P.W.D., Vellore and by such an agreement, two cheques for a sum of Rs. 2,40,000/- were received by the Society from the respondent. Even after receiving the amount for the performance of manufacturing of paddle shutters by the Cooperative Society, the Society has failed; which eventually ...
- ‹ Prev
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next ›