Chennai Court November 2004 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shasun Drugs and Chemicals Rep. by the General Manager (Commercial), C ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-02-2004
Reported in: 2006(198)ELT179(Mad); (2004)4MLJ688
ORDERK. Raviraja Pandian, J.1. The writ petition in W.P. No. 26760 of 2004 is filed seeking the relief of issuance of writ of certiorari to call for the records of the third respondent, Deputy Commissioner of Customs, Chennai in detention notice F.NO.S.59/ DEEC/485/95 Gr.7(PT) dated 2.9.2004 and quash the same. 2. The writ petition in W.P. No. 26761 of 2004 is filed seeking the relief of issuance of writ of certiorari to call for the records of the first respondent, Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, (hereinafter referred to as 'CESTAT') in final order No. 414 of 2004 dated 28.4.2004 and quash the same.3. As the detention notice dated 2.9.2004 impugned in W.P. No. 36760 of 2004 is consequential to the order impugned in W.P. No. 26761 of 2004, both the writ petitions are taken together for consideration.4. The material facts go as follows:The petitioner is a Company engaged in the manufacture of bulk drugs in its factory at Pondicherry and Cuddalore. For the purpose of ...
K.S. Ganapathya Pillai, Managing Trustee Vs. the Deputy Commissioner, ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-01-2004
Reported in: 2004(5)CTC328
P.D. Dinakaran, J.1. The appeal is directed against the order dated 12.10.2000 made in Writ Petition No. 21075 of 1993 dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellant herein.2. In brief, the appellant/writ petitioner made a challenge to the proceedings of the first respondent dated 21.11.1993, whereunder a disciplinary action was initiated against the petitioner under Section 53(1)(c) & (2) of the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') for certain alleged misconducts and irregularities and certain charges were framed thereunder. Consequently, by an even dated proceedings, the first respondent also appointed a Fit Person to manage the affairs of Arupathu Moovar Annathana Chathram, Tirunelveli. While the said proceedings dated 21.11.1993 were challenged by the appellant/writ petitioner, this Court granted interim stay in favour of the appellant/writ petitioner and the same was in force till the writ petition was dismissed...
Pvg Industries Vs. Premier Industries Drives (P) Ltd.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-01-2004
Reported in: 2004(5)CTC332; (2004)4MLJ685
ORDERR. Banumathi, J.1. This contempt appeal is filed against the order dated 13.8.2004 passed in Contempt Petition No. 46 of 2000 by P.K. Misra J.2. When the matter came up for admission, we have heard Ms.Chitra Narayan for the appellant and Mr. Sathish Parasaran for the respondent caveator.3. Relevant facts which led to the present appeal could briefly be stated thus: (DB) (R, Banumathi, J.) A. No. 817 of 1998 in C.S. No. 963 of 1998 was filed by the respondent - M/s.Premier Industries Drives (P) Limited, the plaintiff, for injunction and other reliefs in respect of wet grinders manufactured by the applicant as per the Patent, bearing No. 179607. During the pendency of the suit, the respondent/plaintiff obtained an interim order of injunction restraining the defendant 'from in any way using the process within the range, scope or purview of the said Patent bearing No. 179607 ...' At that stage, the plaintiff has filed Contempt Petition No. 46 of 2000 on the allegation that in spite of...
Mrs. V. Chandrakanth Vs. State of Tamil Nadu Department of Housing and ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-01-2004
Reported in: 2004(5)CTC663; (2004)4MLJ632
P.D. Dinakaran, J.1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 10.12.1999 made in W.P.No.3334 of 1996.2. For the purpose of convenience we will refer to the parties as arrayed in the writ petition.3.1. The petitioner purchased land of an extent of 32 cents located in Survey No.188/5, Thiruvanmayur Village under a registered document bearing No.191/1994, dated 31.7.1974 and also obtained a patta in her favour on 16.11.1974 and her name was entered in the revenue records. Concededly, it was only thereafter, namely on 19.2.1975, the said land was proposed to be acquired for a Housing Scheme by issuing a notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act (for brevity 'the Act').3.2. The said notification issued under Section 4(1) of the Act dated 19.2.1975 was challenged by the petitioner's father-in-law in W.P.No.9484 of 1983 and the Division Bench of this Court, by order dated 24.4.1991, quashed the said notification issued under Section 4(1) of the Act, finding that the s...
G.V. Srinivasan Chettiar Trust Rep. by Its Trustees, (M.K.A.N. Gupta, ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-01-2004
Reported in: 2004(5)CTC624
V. Kanagaraj, J.1. This appeal has been preferred against the order dated 26.6.2001, passed by a learned single Judge of this Court in W.P. No. 16767 of 1994, dismissing the petition filed for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the first respondent to refer to the High Court to decide the matter under Section 57 of the Indian Stamp Act for adjudication of the question of law pertaining to the interpretation of the document dated 7.10.1991 presented by the respondents before the Joint-Registrar-II, Karur whether the said document is a declaration of Trust amounting to settlement or it is only a document making a declaration of pre-existing Trust and not transferring the ownership of any specific property or creating a Trust executing a deed in favour of the trustees.2. Creating a Trust viz., Thiru G.V. Srinivasan Chettiar Trust by a registered Will dated 5.12.1990 executed by the said G.V. Srinivasan Chettiar, who died on 5.1.1991, the petitioners, ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›