Chennai Court March 1999 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
S. Venkatachalam and anr. Vs. Subbiah and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-03-1999
Reported in: (1999)2MLJ355
ORDERS.M. Abdul Wahab, J.1. This is a petition for transfer of E.P.No. 71 of 1996 and E.P.No. 72 of 1996 in O.S.No. 256 of 1973 on the file of the learned District Munsif, Tiruppur, to the Sub Court, Tiruppur, for joint enquiry along with O.S.No. 534 of 1994.2. In the affidavit filed in support of the transfer petition, the petitioners alleged that their father filed suit O.S.No. 256 of 1993 on the file of Subordinate Judge, Tiruppur, against his brother, mother and sisters. There was preliminary decree in the said suit. The respondents who were parties defendants were granted larger shares in the final decree. The petitioners were minors. But, they were not made parties at all. Hence, they filed the present suit O.S.No. 534 of 1994 on the file of Sub Court, Tiruppur, against the respondents claiming 2/6th share in all the properties. Taking advantage of the decree in O.S.No. 256 of 1973, the 3rd respondent filed E.P.No. 71 of 1996 and the second respondent filed E.P.No. 72 of 1996 on ...
L. Raju Fernando Vs. the Authorised Officer and Deputy Conservator of ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-03-1999
Reported in: (1999)3MLJ162
ORDERS.S. Subramani, J.1. Petitioner in Crl.M.P. No. 2560 of 1998 on the file of Principal Sessions Judge, Thiruvannamalai is the revision petitioner herein. This revision is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India.2. Vehicle belonging to petitioner. Tata Sumo car bearing registration No.Ka-17-2042 was seized as per Section 41 of Tamil Nadu Forests Act, 1882 and first information report was registered on 23.9.1997.3. It is the case of petitioner that he came to know about the seizure of vehicle by Forest Department very late and when he was served with notice of confiscation, he preferred a revision against the order before the Conservator of Forests, Vellore. But, no orders have been passed on the same. Therefore, petitioner filed W.P. No. 14037 of 1998 for the issuance of writ of mandamus directing Conservator of Forests to pass final orders.4. When the matter in writ petition came up for argument before High Court, it was pointed out that against the order of confiscation, ...
Narayana Gounder Vs. Devaki Ammal and Another
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-01-1999
Reported in: 1999(2)CTC439
ORDER1. The case has had a chequered career.2. The first defendant in O.S.No. 278 of 1982 on the file of the District Munsif of Villupuram is the appellant in the second appeal. The first respondent herein filed the suit for declaration of title and possession on the following averments: The suit properties originally belonged to one Lakshmi Animal. Herdaughter-in-law was one Govindammal. Her brother was Gurusamy andGurusamy's son one Jagadev was married to one, Dhanammal the firstrespondent was their daughter. Lakshmiammal executed a registeredsettlement deed under Ex.A-1 on 29.12.1959 giving the properties to herdaughter-in-law Govindammal to be enjoyed by her during her life timewithout powers of alienation and the grandchildren of Gurusamy were to takethe suit properties absolutely after the life time of Govindammal.Govindammal sold away the suit first item to the appellant on ,10,1.1974 andbequeathed the second item to one Mannangatti Gounder, who in his turn soldthat item to the ...
Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies, Corporation Employees Union, (Regn. No. 325 ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-01-1999
Reported in: 1999(3)CTC325
Judgment Pronounced by P. Sathasivam, J.1. Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies Corporation Employees Union represented by its General Secretary and for others have filed the above writ petition seeking direction to the respondents to regularise the services of the petitioner 2 to 5 fixing their basic pay at the scale of lowest grade of employees at the lowest pay scale of the first respondent Corporation with effect from the date when they completed 480 days within the period of 24 calendar months, reckoning from their date of entry into service in the first respondent Corporation and further direct the respondents to pay the differences of amount to the aforesaid employees, working out on the basis, deducting the amount already paid to them within a reasonable time to be fixed by this Court. 2. The case of the petition is briefly stated hereunder: The first petitioner is a registered Trade Union and has been espousing cause of the said employees who are its members for several years. The respon...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Next ›