Chennai Court October 1999 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dr. R. Murali Vs. Dr. R. Kamalakkannan and Three Others
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-01-1999
Reported in: 1999(3)CTC675; (2000)1MLJ1
ORDERJudgement pronounced by S.S. Subramani, J.1. Parties herein will be referred according to their ranks in the writ petitions. 2. All these writ appeals are placed before this larger Bench under the following circumstances: Writ Petitioners filed W.P.Nos. 6314 to 6317 and 6743 of 1999 for the issuance of order of direction declaring that the reservation of 50% of seats for non-service candidates in the selection for Higher speciality courses more particularly D.M. (Rhematology, Nephrology, Cardiology) for the year 1999-2000 course in Tamil Nadu Government Medical Colleges by respondents/appellants as illegal, unconstitutional null and void and consequently to set aside the selection of candidates made on that basis and select respective petitions for the above course and for consequential reliefs. 3. In W.P. Nos.6314 and 6315 of 1999, petitioners wanted to join DM (Cardiology). Writ petitioner in W.P. 6316 of 1999 applied for the course of DM (Nephrology) and writ petitioner in W.P....
Civicons Engineers and Contractors Vs. Aurofood Limited
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-01-1999
Reported in: [2000]100CompCas623(Mad)
R. Jayasimha Babu, J.1. Counsel contends that the arbitral award is executable even though there is no decree in terms of the award. That is no doubt correct. However, the executability is dependent upon the time for filing an application under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ('the Act') to set aside the award having expired and in the event of that application having been filed within that time allowed under the law for setting aside the award, such application having been disposed of by the court by refusing to set aside the award.2. Admittedly the respondent-company has applied for setting aside the award. Until that proceeding is over, and the court makes an order refusing to set aside the award, the award will not be enforceable as provided under Section 36 of the Act.3. The proceeding for winding up of a company has been initiated on the ground that the respondent-company is unable to pay its debts. Though prima facie that claim is substantiated by the ex...
Society of Auditors and Etc. Vs. Comptroller and Auditor General of In ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-01-1999
Reported in: AIR2000Mad92
ORDERP.D. Dinakaran, J.1. Chartered Accountants Study Circle, the petitioners in W.P. Nos. 12631 and 12479 of 1999, as well as the Society of Auditors the petitioners in W.P. Nos. 12480 and 12630 of 1999 are societies registered under the Societies Registration Act, bearing Regn. Nos. 68/80 and 6/1932-33 respectively.2. Petitioners in W.P, Nos. 12479 and 12480 of 1999 seek for a Writ of Declaration to declare the Form of Application for Multi Purpose Empanelment as published in the Journal of Institute of Chartered Accountants, June, 1999. Pages 74-106 issued by the first respondent as ultra vires the provisions of Chapter VII of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949. Chapter X of the Chartered Accountants Regulations, 1988. Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 21 of the Constitution of India insofar as the petitioners are concerned.3. The petitioners in W.P. Nos. 12630and 12631 of 1999 seek a Writ of Declaration to declare the Form of Empanelment to the Office of the first respondent therein as pu...
Chartered Accountants Study Circle Vs. Institute of Chartered Accounta ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-01-1999
Reported in: [2000]108TAXMAN341(Mad)
ORDER1. Chartered Accountants Study Circle, the petitioners in W.P. Nos. 12631 and 12479 of 1999 as well as the Society of Auditors, the petitioners in W.P. Nos. 12480 and 12630 of 1999, are societies registered under the Societies Registration Act, bearing Regn. Nos. 68 of 1980 and 6/1932-33, respectively.2. Petitioners in W.P. Nos. 12479 and 12480 of 1999 seek for a writ of declaration to declare the form of application for multipurpose empanelment as published in the Journal of Institute of Chartered Accountants, June 1999, pages 74-106 issued by the first respondent as ultra vires the provisions of Chapter VR of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949. Chapter X of the Chartered Accountants Regulations, 1988, the articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 21 of the Constitution of India insofar as the petitioners are concerned.3. The petitioners in W.P. Nos. 12630 and 12631 of 1999 seek a writ of declaration to declare the form of empanelment to the office of the first respondent therein as published i...
Society of Auditors Vs. Comptroller and Auditor General of India
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-01-1999
Reported in: [2000]111TAXMAN516(Mad)
ORDER1. Chartered Accountants Study Circle, the petitioners in W.P. Nos. 12631 and 12479 of 1999, as well as the Society of Auditors, the petitioners in W.P. Nos. 12480 and 12630 of 1999 are societies registered under the Societies Registration Act, bearing Regn. Nos. 68/80 and 6/1932-33, respectively.2. The petitioners in W.P. Nos. 12479 and 12480 of 1999 seek for a writ of declaration to declare the form of application for Multi Put-pose Empanelment as published in the Journal of Institute of Chartered Accountants, June, 1999, pp. 74-106 issued by the first respondent as ultra vires the provisions of Chapter VII of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, Chapter X of the Chartered Accountants Regulations, 1988, articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 21 of the Constitution insofar as the petitioners are concerned.3. The petitioners in W.P. Nos. 12630 and 12631 of 1999 seek a writ of declaration to declare the form of empanelment to the office of the first respondent therein as published in the Journa...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›