Chennai Court October 1998 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
A. Mohammed YasIn Vs. the Government of Tamil Nadu and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-05-1998
Reported in: (1999)3MLJ112
ORDERS.S. Subramani, J.1. Petitioner seeks issuance of writ of certiorarified mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of a writ, calling for the records of respondents ending with the order of 4th respondent in Letter No. Peea/Ph/TNEA 98, dated 23.7.1998 and quash the same, and direct the respondents herein to forthwith re-allot the petitioner herein to undergo First Year Engineering Course in Computer Science in any one of the Government Colleges under the control of 2nd respondent herein, and pass such further or other orders as this Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.2. Petitioner is an orthopaedicaly physically handicapped person. Both his legs are affected by post-polio paralysis. The extent of disability is 60%. It is said that the direction of Artificial Limb Centre, K.K. Nagar, Government of Tamil Nadu Hospital, has issued a medical certificate, certifying that he is an orthopadically physically handicapped and eligib...
P. Janakiraman Vs. N. Uma Devi and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-05-1998
Reported in: (1999)1MLJ276
ORDERS.S. Subramani, J.1. Landlord in R.C.O.P. No. 1530 of 1986, on the file of 14th Judge, Court of Small Cause, Madras, is the revision petitioner.2. The revision is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, complaining to this Court the injustice done to the petitioner, and how the lower Court passed the impugned Order in a callous manner.3. Eviction petition was filed by petitioner herein as R.C.O.P. No. 1530 of 1986 on various grounds. It was hotly contested, and finally an order of eviction was passed by this Court in C.R.P. No. 2759 of 1993 dated 28.10.1995. This Court, while passing the Order of eviction, directed the respondent therein to file an affidavit of undertaking within four weeks from that date, agreeing to vacate the premises in question, and in case they filed such an undertaking within the stipulated time, they will be given three months time to vacate and handover possession. Respondents therein did not file such an undertaking. Naturally, the decree-h...
L. Dakshinamoorthy, Advocate Vs. Bar Council of Tamil Nadu Represented ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-05-1998
Reported in: (1999)1MLJ188
ORDERS.S. Subramani, J.1. This revision is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the notice issued by 1st respondent-Bar Council of Tamil Nadu, to the petitioner under Rule 5 in Chapter 1, Part VII read with Section 35/36 of Advocates Act, 1961.2. Relevant facts which resulted in issuance of the said notice may be summarised thus:Late S.S.M. Mari Chettiar had six sons, and there was an inter se dispute between them., They even thought of initiating legal proceedings by going to Court. At that time, some well-wishers of the family suggested that it is a matter which has to be settled out of court, and advocate Mr. Sarangan, Bangalore was appointed as Arbitrator. Petitioner herein, who is also an advocate, was closely connected with the family, both in view of his relationship and also in view of his appointment as Legal Advisor in various Companies run by the family. Petitioner, in view of his intimate connection with the family (not as an advocate) was also asked...
Mohan Aluminium Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Klen and Marshall's Manufacturers and Ex ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-05-1998
Reported in: (1999)1MLJ84
ORDERS.S. Subramani, J.1. All these revisions arise from the same suit, namely, O.S. No. 6522 of 1997, on the file of XVIIth Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Madras. First three revisions are filed by the first defendant in the suit and C.R.P. No. 2573 of 1998 is filed by 2nd defendant in that suit.2. Relevant facts may be summarised thus: Under the World Bank Scheme, the Madhya Pradesh State Electricity Board, who is the petitioner in C.R.P. No. 2573 of 1998, invited tenders for supply of certain conductors to draw transmission lines. Five companies formed themselves into a consortium and the plaintiff in the suit was appointed as their Agent. In that capacity, it received supply orders from the Board and received an advance of Rs. 41/2 crores. Plaintiff also executed a performance guarantee issued by Bank at Bombay. But plaintiff was not in a position to procure raw material to perform the contract in any manner. Since it is World Bank Project, time for performance was important. O...
The United Planters Association of Southern India and anr. Vs. P. Swam ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-05-1998
Reported in: (1999)1MLJ64
ORDERS.S. Subramani, J.1. Defendants in O.S. No. 690 of 1995, on the file of Sub Court, Udhagamandalam, are the revision petitioners.2. The revision is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.3. Respondent herein filed O.S. No. 362 of 1994, on the file of District Court, Udhagamandalam, which was subsequently renumbered as O.S. No. 690 of 1995, on the file of Sub Court, Udhagamandalam. The suit filed by him was one for a declaration that the order dated 5.7.1994passed by defendants dismissing the plaintiff from service was illegal, non est, baseless unenforceable in law and opposed to principles of natural justice, and for a consequential mandatory injunction directing defendants to pay plaintiff his gratuity amount of Rs. 94,095 with interest thereon at 24% per annum from the date of suit till date of payment and for all his service-cum-retirement benefits including pension due to him as per law and for other reliefs.4. It is the case of the plaintiff that he was in the s...
Minor Divya Mohandoss Represented by Her Father and Guardian Dr. K.A. ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-05-1998
Reported in: (1999)1MLJ651
ORDERS.S. Subramani, J.1. Petitioner is a minor and she is represented by her father, natural guardian.2. Petitioner after passing plus two examinations appeared for the entrance examinations conducted by the Tamil Nadu Professional Courses. She applied for admission to the first year M.B.B.S. course and she sought allotment under the quota ear-marked for Tamil Language Development. The Government of Tamil Nadu had decided to fix a quota for children whose parents had worked for the enrichment, propagation and development of Tamil language and who had made significant contribution to Tamil society, culture and literature. As per the terms of the prospectus, the number of seats reserved for the above category is six. A committee of Tamil scholars would examine the claims of the eligible persons whose children apply for the above mentioned special category quota. The publications made by the persons have to be scrutinized by the Secretary, Selection Committee and the candidate should als...
Minor S. Kavi, Represented by Her Father and Natural Guardian S. Subba ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-05-1998
Reported in: (1999)2MLJ466
ORDERS.S. Subramani, J.1. Petitioner seeks issuance of writ of mandamus directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's name under the special category of children born of inter-caste marriage for the admission of 1st year M.B.B.S. course for the year 1988-89 and direct the respondents to call the petitioner for counselling and pass such further orders.2. The petitioner is a minor, represented by her natural guardian father, who has filed the affidavit. Petitioner after completing her Plus Two examination applied for first year M.B.B.S. course for the year 1998-99 under special category for the children born of inter-caste marriage. The cut-off marks for the M.B.B.S. admission is 258.83. Petitioner's father belongs to scheduled caste and mother belongs to forward community. According to the petitioner, she got first preference in the selection order of the special category. There are 12 seats reserved for M.B.B.S. course. But when the results were published, in the Hindu, she fo...
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›