Chennai Court May 1997 Judgments
Madurai City Municipal Corporation Madurai, Through the Commissioner O ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-13-1997
Reported in: 1998(1)CTC278
ORDER1. The Second Appeal is directed against the judgment in A.S.No. 119 of 1980 on the file of Sub-Court, Madurai, reversing the judgment and decree in O.S.No. 886 of 1978 on the file of the Additional District Munsif's Court, Madurai Town. The facts of the case are as follows:-The respondent claiming to be the Secretary of Om Saravana Bhave Thiru Murugan Primary School, filed a suit for recovery of a sum of Rs. 4,401-50 as the contribution payable to the School by the Madurai City Municipal Corporation/appellant herein. The Contribution was claimed for the period from 1.10.1974 to 30.9.1977. According to the respondent/plaintiff, the Municipal Corporation was bound to pay 5 paise per day for 200 days for 150 students. The respondent had to barrow and feed the studentsnotwithstanding the fact that the Corporation failed to pay their contribution. In the written statement the Corporation contended that there is no statutory duty on the Corporation to pay the contribution to the School...
Tag this Judgment!A.M.A. Jabbar Vs. T.S. Abdul Bari and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-06-1997
Reported in: (1997)2MLJ181
ORDERAR. Lakshmanan, J.1. The tenant is the review petitioner. The landlord T.M. Sulaiman filed a petition under Sections 10(2)(i) and 10(3)(c) of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960, for eviction of the tenant in R.C.O.P. No. 253 of 1985 on the file of the Rent Controller/District Munsif, Coimbatore, on the ground of wilful default in payment of rent and for additional accommodation. The eviction petition was resisted by the tenant contending that he had not committed any default in payment of rent and that the requirement of the landlord for additional accommodation is not bona fide. The learned Rent Controller dismissed the petition against which the legal representatives of the landlord T.M. Sulaiman, the respondent herein, filed R.C.A. No. 67 of 1989 on the file of the Appellate Authority/Subordinate Judge, Coimbatore. The learned Appellate Authority has confirmed the findings of the learned Rent Controller insofar as it relates to the requirement of the pr...
Tag this Judgment!T. Lakshmikumar Thathachariar Vs. the Commissioner, Hindu Religious an ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-02-1997
Reported in: AIR1997Mad346; 1997(1)CTC744; (1997)IIMLJ642
ORDERShiva Raj Paul, J. 1. Heard the learnedsenior counsel and Special G. P. for the parlies.2. Following are the facls and events leading to the filing of these appeals:--The appellant is one and the same in both these appeals. For convenience, we will refer to the parties as they are arrayed in the writ petitions. The Writ Appeal No. 122/87 is filed challenging the order dated 29-10-1986 passed by the learned single Judge in Writ Petition No. 5121/82. In Writ Appeal No. 141/97 the order dated 17-2-1997 made by the learned single Judge in Writ Petitions No. 2082/97 is challenged.3. In Writ Petition No. 5121/82 the prayer was to quash the order of the second respondent dated 25-6-1982 made in O-A. No. 95/78 proposing to modify the scheme framed by this Court in A.S. No. 175 of 1934 in relation to Arulmighu Devarajaswami Temple, Kancheepuram, and to direct the second respondent to conduct a fresh enquiry on merits with regard to the contentions raised before him in O.A. No. 95 of 1978. ...
Tag this Judgment!T. Lakshmikumara Thathachariar Vs. the Commissioner, Hindu Religious a ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-02-1997
Reported in: (1997)2MLJ642
Shivaraj Patil, J.1. Heard the learned senior counsel and Special Government Pleader for the parties.2. Following are the facts and events leading to the filing of these appeals:The appellant is one and the same in both these appeals. For convenience, we will refer to the parties as they are arrayed in the writ petitions. The Writ Appeal No. 122 of 1987 is filed challenging the order dated 29.10.1986 passed by the learned single Judge in Writ Petition No. 5121 of 1982. In Writ-Appeal No. 141 of 1997 the order dated 17.2.1997 made by the learned single Judge in Writ Petition No. 2082 of 1997 is challenged.3. In Writ Petition No. 5121 of 1982 the prayer was to quash the order of the second respondent dated 25.6.1982 made in O.A. No. 95 of 1978 proposing to modify the scheme framed by this Court in A.S. No. 175 of 1934 in relation to Arulmighu Devarajaswami Temple, Kancheepuram, and to direct the second respondent to conduct a fresh enquiry on merits with regard to the contentions raised ...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- Next ›