Chennai Court October 1996 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sri Rajaji Bharath Kumar Represented by Partner Vs. K. Muralidhar
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-01-1996
Reported in: (1997)1MLJ89
ORDERN. Arumugham, J.1. On ordering notice of motion, I have had an occasion of hearing the Bar for the respective parties, even while the revision was sought to be admitted against the impugned order passed by the learned VII Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Madras in O.A. No. 7716of 1996 in O.S. No. 124 of 1985 dated 3.7.1996 allowing a petition filed under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure to subject two documents viz., letters dated 18.10.1983 and 17.7.1984, claimed to have been written by the first defendant in favour of the plaintiff, to the examination of the hand-writing expert for the reasoning that they are being disputed with regard to their contents, challenging the propriety and legality of the impugned order.2. The petitioner herein filed the suit for the recovery of the balance due on the hire purchase agreement from the defendants and it is being resisted by the defendants by filing a detailed written statement. When the suit was about to be posted in the lis...
Palaniswamy Gounder and ors. Vs. Varadaraja Perumal Temple, by Its Fit ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-01-1996
Reported in: (1997)1MLJ381
Raju, J.1. The above two appeals have been filed against the appeals in C.M.A. Nos. 104 of 1977 and 39 of 1978 on the file of the Minor Inams Tribunal (Sub Court, Erode) dated 9.11.1982, confirming the orders of the Settlement Tahsildar IV, Erode dated 9.9.1970 granting ryotwari patta in favour of the respondent-temple under Section 11 read with Section 8(2)(i)(b) and 8(2)(ii) of the Tamil Nadu Minor Inams (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Act, 1963.2. The lands mentioned in the Schedule to the order of the Settlement Tahsildar were said to be unenfranchised minor Inam granted for the support of the pagoda of Varadarajaperumal at Nathakadayur, Dharapuram Taluk and the said grant was also stated to have been confirmed by the British Government in T.D. No. 2478 permanently to the pagoda, so long as it is well kept up. The inam in question was notified under Section 1(5) of the said Act and taken over on and from 15.2.1965. Some of the persons in occupation of the lands, have prefe...
Poongavanam Vs. Perumal Pillai and anr.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-01-1996
Reported in: (1997)1MLJ169
Raju, J.1. The above second appeal has been filed by the plaintiff in O.S. No. 313 of 1977 on the file of the District Munsif Court at Kallakurichi, against the judgment and decree of the learned Subordinate Judge, Vridhachalam, dated 28.8.1982 in A.S. No. 153 of 1991, reversing the judgment and decree of learned trial Judge dated 27.1.1981 in O.S. No. 313 of 1977.2. The plaintiff has filed the suit for declaration of her title to the suit properties, for a directions the 2nd defendant to deliver possession of the suit properties to the plaintiff and for mesne profits.3. The case of the plaintiff before the trial court was that the properties belonged to the 1st defendant, Pappathi Ammal who was in possession and enjoyment of the same that the plaintiff is the daughter of the maternal uncle of the 1st defendant and the 2nd defendant is the son of the maternal uncle of the 1st defendant. The 1st defendant was stated to have had no issues. The 2nd defendant was said to have obtained a de...
S.Rm. Ranjitham Vs. Joint Director of Secondary Education and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-01-1996
Reported in: (1997)1MLJ357
ORDERS.M. Abdul Wahab, J.1. This writ petition is for quashing the order of the first respondent in M.M.No. 227650/G7/87 dated 3.11.1987, directing the cancellation of the petitioner appointment as headmaster and post the third respondent in his place.2. The case of the petitioner in brief is that he was appointed as Graduate Teacher in 1956 in the second respondent school. He has put in 31 years of unblemished service. He got B.T.Degree in 1956 and M.A. degree in 1984. He obtained B.Sc, degree in 1953 and B.T.Degree in 1956 itself. He was promoted as P.G.Assistant from 18.10.1985. Therefore he was appointed as Headmaster of the second respondent school from 1.6.1987, but the second on 3.11.1987 set aside the promotion and directed the promotion of the third respondent. Hence the writ petition.3. In W.M.P. No. 19230 of 1987 the third respondent has filed a counter-affidavit stating that the petitioner has misrepresented the facts. The second respondent erred in posting the petitioner a...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›