Chennai Court May 1993 Judgments
integral Coach Factory Staff Council and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-25-1993
Reported in: (1994)ILLJ678Mad; (1993)IIMLJ343
Abdul Hadi, J.1. A decision on a short point would dispose of the above referred to two writ appeals against W.P. No. 16141 of 1991, according to Mr. K. Alagiriswami, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the 3 appellants in W.A. No. 1865 of 1992 and respondents 1 to 3 in W.A. No. 418 of 1993. Therefore, the said point alone was argued before us and we dispose of these writ appeals based only on the decision we are giving on the said point.2. These proceedings deal with the relevant rules relating to the election to the 12th Staff Council of the Integral Coach Factory at Madras. The abovesa id short point is whether the General Manager of the said Integral Coach Factory has got the power to amend the relevant rules.3. W.P. No. 16141 of 1991 is by (1) Integral Coach Factory Staff Council, Madras, (2) Integral Coach Factory Labour Union, Madras, and (3) one D. Loganathan, who is said to be worker in the said Integral Coach Factory, affected by the abovesaid amendment made just as the abov...
Tag this Judgment!Sundaresan Alias Meganathan Alias Mega Vs. State
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-18-1993
Reported in: 1993CriLJ3342
Swamidurai, J.1. The accused in Crime No. 211 of 1993 on the file of the Inspector of Police, R4 Pondy Bassar Police Station, Madras has filed this petition for grant of bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 2. The petitioner stands charged for on offence punishable under Section 20(b)(i) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as NDPS Act). The respondent is stated to have seized one kilo and 50 grams of Ganja from the petitioner on 5-3-1993 at about 9.30 p.m. and remanded to judicial custody on 6-3-93 at about 9.00 a.m. for fifteen days. The petitioner submits that the order of remand is illegal and that the entire story of the prosecution is false and fabricated. The case of the petitioner is that after the arrest on 5-3-93 at 9.30 p.m. he was confined in a hotel room and that the petitioner was not informed of the grounds of arrest, nor was he permitted to inform his people or to consult his legal practitioner of is c...
Tag this Judgment!T. Duraiswami Vs. Lakshmi and anr.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-18-1993
Reported in: (1993)2MLJ169
ORDERPratap Singh, J.1. This appeal is directed against order in E.A. No. 870 of 1991 in E.P.A. No. 6 of 1991 in O.S. No. 4 of 1987 on the file of Subordinate Judge of Erode, in which the learned Subordinate Judge had dismissed the petition filed by the appellant for setting aside the court auction sale.2. The petitioner's/the appellant's case is briefly as follows:He is the judgment-debtor. Item No. 1 in the execution petition was sold on 24-10-1991 for Rs. 1,05,000. As per Order 21, Rule 66(2)(e), Civil Procedure Code, the execution court need not fix the upset price of the property to be sold. It is an obligation imposed upon the court to give the value of the decree holder and judgment-debtor. While so, the amin, a court officer was deputed to inspect the property to be sold and give his valuation and in this case the Amin had fixed the value at Rs. 3 lakhs. The sale proclamation effected by the court contained the value of the judgment-debtor, the value of the Amin and the value o...
Tag this Judgment!Indian Overseas Bank Officers' Union, Madras Vs. Indian Overseas Bank, ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-11-1993
Reported in: (1995)ILLJ719Mad; (1993)IIMLJ553
ORDERA.R. Laskhmanan, J. 1. W. P. No. 3834 of 1992 has been filed by the petitioner for the following relief : '... to issue a writ or order or direction in the nature of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records connected with the settlement dated 12.11.1990 and quash clause 5(a) of the settlement dated 12.11.1990 as illegal and against law and direct the respondent to give equal opportunity to the employees of the erstwhile B. O. T. Limited in promotion and other allied avenues....' 2. The said writ petition is filed by Indian Overseas Bank Employees' Association for issuing a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records in connection with the settlement dated 12.11.1990 entered into between the management of Indian Overseas Bank and all India Overseas Bank employees' Union and quash clause 5(a) of the aforesaid settlement and direct the respondent to give equal opportunity to the employees of the erstwhile Bank of Tamil Nadu Limited in promotion and other allied ave...
Tag this Judgment!Abdul Salam and Another Vs. Inspector of Police R. 1 Mambalam Police S ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-04-1993
Reported in: 1994CriLJ578
ORDER1. Petitioner Abdul Salam was tried for an offence punishable under S. 448, IPC in C.C. No. 661 of 1985 on the file of the IV Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Madras. After trial, the petitioner was found guilty under S. 448, IPC and was convicted and sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 150/- in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one month. Petitioner has come up with this revision challenging the legality and propriety of the said judgment and the consequent conviction and sentence imposed on him. 2. Consequent to the conviction and sentence referred to above, P.W. 1 Dhanraj N. Kochar, petitioner in Crl. R.C. 702 of 1989 filed a petition under S. 456, Cr.P.C. before the IV Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Madras, for the restoration of the possession of the premises bearing door number 26, Ranganathan Street, T. Nagar, Madras in Cr.M.P. 138 of 1987 in C.C. 661 of 1985 and it appears from the case records that the learned trial Magistrate without ordering notice to the re...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- Next ›