Chennai Court January 1993 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Raja Devaputhran Cunniah Vs. the Regional Transport Officer
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-21-1993
Reported in: (1993)1MLJ516
ORDERJanarthanam, J.1. One Raja Devaputhran Cunniah, a resident of Trivandrum, holds a permit for the vehicle KRV 7270 granted by the State Transport Authority, Kerala, to use the vehicle as an All India Tourist Vehicle. It can operate throughout India without any endorsement from any other State. Its liability to pay tax is only to the parent State viz. the Kerala Government. This had been paid and the vehicle had been used as a contract carriage.2. The vehicle was checked by the Motor Vehicles Inspector, Grade II, Salem on 27.6.1983. A check report was issued alleging that the vehicle was coming from Trichy to Bangalore along with 35 adult passengers, collecting Rs. 40 for the journey as individual fare. Based on the check report, the Regional Transport Officer, Salem, issued a show cause notice stating that the vehicle was being used as a stage carriage and hence the permit holder is liable to pay proportionate lax of Rs. 3,267 for the month of June, 1983 to the Government of Tamil ...
P. Manogarane, Secretary, the Pondicherry Bar Association Vs. Union of ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-21-1993
Reported in: (1993)2MLJ50
ORDERA.R. Lakshmanan, J.1. W.P. No. 3642 of 1992: The petitioner is the Secretary of the Pondicherry Bar Association. He filed the above writ petition on behalf of the Bar Association, which according to the petitioner, is devoted to act in furtherance of the interest of the Bar, Judiciary and the Rule of Law with a view to achieve justice to the litigant public, with the following prayer:To issue a writ in the nature of a certiorari or any other appropriate writ or order, calling for the records relating to the Order No. 59/SPA/ 92-LD, dated 27.2.1992 on the file of the 4th respondent and G.O.Ms. No. 31/84/LLD, dated 2.7.1984 on the file of the 4th respondent and to quash the same and to pass such further or other order as this Court may deem fit and proper.2. The petitioner filed W.M.P. No. 19852 of 1992 to amend the prayer in the writ petition, which is as follows:To issue a writ in the nature of a certiorari or any other appropriate writ or order, calling for the records relating t...
T.S. Sadagopan (Deceased) and ors. Vs. T.N.K. Ramanujam and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-21-1993
Reported in: (1993)2MLJ481
Srinivasan, J.1. This thirty year old litigation was initiated by Sundararaja Bagavadar, son of Nannayya Bagavadar, for a declaration that the donation of 17th February, 1949 made by the latter had absorbed in full the disposable quota and consequently the former was the owner of 1/3rd share in the undivided properties, being the subject matter of donations dated 17th March, 1959 and 27th July, 1960 and the will dated 27th February, 1961 executed by the latter and for partition besides other reliefs. Even before the suit was taken up for trial, the plaintiff died and his three sons came on record as plaintiffs 2 to 4 to continue the litigation. Nannayya Bagavadar had two wives, Sankara Ammal and Ranganayaki Animal. Through his first wife, he had two daughters and three sons. The eldest son was the first plaintiff. The sons of the second son were impleaded as plaintiffs 5 to 9 and after the death of the 6th plaintiff, his legal representatives came on record as plaintiffs 10 to 12. The ...
R. Sarojini Vs. Superintending Engineer, Tamilnadu Housing Board and a ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-20-1993
Reported in: (1993)1MLJ659
ORDERJanarthanam, J.1. The present action by R. Sarojini, the petitioner herein, is under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issue of a writ of certiorari, calling for the records connected with the order of the Superintending Engineer, World Bank Circle, Tamil Nadu Housing Board, Madras-40, the first respondent herein, in Letter No. AS 5/14843/81, dated 7.10.1982, cancelling the allotment of plot No. 3/173 in Villivakkam Sites and Services Scheme and quash the order therein dated 7.10.1982. 2. The Tamil Nadu Housing Board in collaboration with Madras Metropolitan Development Authority floated a scheme with the assistance of the World Bank to provide house sites together with semi-structure for the benefit of the economically weaker sections of people. The scheme was taken up at Kodungaiyur Village and Villivakkam area and was called Villivakkam Sites and Services Scheme Phase-I. According to the scheme and the rules in force, it is said, only one, either the husband or the ...
The Superintending Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board and ors. Vs. ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-20-1993
Reported in: (1993)2MLJ287
Janarthanam, J.1. The appellants were the defendants while the respondent was the plaintiff in the suit.2. The plaintiff filed the suit O.S. No. 163 of 1987 on the file of the District Munsifs Court, Sathyamangalam which is one for the reliefs of decision and injunction.3. Service connection No. 44 of Pudhuppeerkadavu village originally stood in the name of one Kariyakkal, who is none else than the mother of the plaintiff. The said service connection was intended for consumption of electrical energy for the purpose of irrigating the lands by means of an electrical motor installed in the pumpset situate at S.No. 327. In the partition that took place, in the family, the said service connection and certain lands were allotted to the share of the plaintiff and since such allotment, he had been consuming electrical energy through that service connection for irrigating the lands. The motor installed to the service connection was a three phase motor and it had been installed on 17.11.1977.4. ...
N. Savithri Vs. United Commercial Bank
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-19-1993
Reported in: [1996]86CompCas34(Mad)
Srinivasan, J. s1. These two appeals arise out of the same suit, one filed by the plaintiff and the other by the defendant. For the sake of convenience, we refer to the parties by the rank they held in the trial court. 2. Mr. G. N. Sam, the husband of the defendant, who was an industrialist got cash credit facilities from the United Commercial Bank Limited, which is now known as UCO Bank. He had pledged 17,000 shares of his in Cambodia Mills Limited, which were valued at Rs. 10 per share on the face of them. Mr. Sam died in 1961, without discharging the loan. He left as his heirs two daughters by his first wife, the defendant who was his second wife and a son and a daughter by the defendant. The defendant borrowed loan from the bank and discharged the amounts due under the loan account of her husband. That was in 1962. That loan account continued to subsist till November, 1963, when she got cash credit facilities for a sum of Rs. 1,00,000 and pledged 2,150 shares of her in Coimbatore S...
Basheer Vs. State by Sub-inspector of Police, Madurai
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-19-1993
Reported in: 1993CriLJ2173
K.M. Natarajan, J. 1. The first-accused in S.C. No. 14 of 1986, on the file of the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai, has preferred this appeal, challenging the legality and correctness of his conviction under section 302 of the India Penal Code and sentence to undergo imprisonment for life. The appellant herein, who is A. 1 before the Trial Court and four others were tried for the following five charges : (1) A. 1 - 148 I.P.C. (2) A. 2 - 147 I.P.C. to A. 5 (3) A. 1 - 302 I.P.C. (4) A. 2 - 302 read with 149 I.P.C. to A. 5 (5) A. 5 - 336 I.P.C. On the allegation that on the night of 25-5-1985 at about 10.30 p.m. at Madurai East Mada Street, near automatic telephone exchange, they formed themselves into an unlawful assembly, with intention to create disturbance and attacked the deceased and during the course of the same transaction A. 1 stabbed the deceased on the right flank and as a result of the same he died on 27-5-1985 at about 4 p.m. at the Government Rajaji Hospital an...
S.R.F. Limited Vs. Central Board of Excise and Customs
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-18-1993
Reported in: 1993(42)ECC309; 1993(66)ELT145(Mad)
ORDER1. The above writ petitions have been filed for a Writ of Declaration to declare that the impugned Circular No. 6/92-CX. 6 issued in F. No. 209/6/92-CX. 6 dated 1-6-1992 issued by the first respondent herein is ultra vires Article 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India and Sections 37 and 37B of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 and Rules 57A, 57C and 57F of the Rules and to declare that the impugned trade notice No. 50/92 dated 9-7-1992 issued by the second respondent herein is also ultra vires Article 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India and Section 37 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 and Rules 57A, 57C, 57F, 191BB and 233 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. 2. The writ petitions were admitted on 14-9-1992 and though initially notice has been ordered in the writ miscellaneous petitions, on 24-12- 1992 the learned Judge (Srinivasan, J.) granted interim stay till 18- 1-1993 of the operation of the Circular dated 1-6-1992 and trade notice dated 9-7-1992 i...
K.R. Murugesan Vs. the Chairman, Ex-servicemen Welfare, Represented by ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-18-1993
Reported in: (1993)1MLJ512
ORDERAbdul Hadi, J.1. Having failed before both the Authorities below, the tenant under the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960, has preferred this civil revision petition.2. The respondents/landlord herein filed the eviction petition R.C.O.P. No. 74 of 1990 on the file of the Rent Controller, Vellore on the ground that the petitioner-tenant used the demised building for a purpose other than that for which it was leased. The petition was filed under Section 10(2)(ii)(b) of the said Act. Both, the Rent Controller and the Appellate Authority, Vellore in R.C.A. No. 6 of 1992 have concurrently held that the petitioner has so used the said building. Admittedly, the petitioner was an ex-servicemen and so the respondents leased out the demised building for running cycle business. There was a raid by the prohibition wing of the police of the abovesaid building on 24.8.1989 and 1/3 bottles of Indian made foreign liquor were seized from the building and in the subsequent poli...
T.P. Ratnam (Died) and ors. Vs. Pandurangan and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-17-1993
Reported in: (1994)1MLJ512
Swamidurai, J.1. The first defendant in O.S. No. 17 of 1978 on the file of learned I Additional District Munsif, Tiruchirapalli has filed this second appeal. The plaintiffs have filed a suit for declaration of their title over the superstructure mentioned in the plaint schedule property and also for a declaration that the decree passed in H.R.C.O.Ps. 334, 335 and 336 of 1973 have become inexecutable and for permanent injunction restraining the first defendant and his men from interfering with the possession of the plaintiffs upon the said superstructures by executing the orders passed in the said H.R.C.O.Ps. It is the case of the plaintiffs that all the superstructures originally belonged to the first defendant have been washed away in floods in 1977 and that they had received subsidies from the Government and put up new superstructures over, the same. Therefore, it is their case that the superstructures do not belong to the defendants at all and so the decrees in the H.R.C.O.Ps. have ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »