Chennai Court April 1992 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
A. Shanmugham Vs. Official Liquidator, High Court, Madras and Others
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-21-1992
Reported in: [1992]75CompCas181(Mad); (1992)IILLJ221Mad
ORDER1. C.A. No. 206 of the 1992 has filed by the applicant A. Shanmugham, to set aside the order of the learned Official Liquidator dated December 11, 1991, in Claim No. 194 in so far as it relates to the closure compensation and to direct the respondent, Official Liquidator, to award interest at 18% p.a. on the admitted amount and to pass such other orders as may be deemed fit and proper. 2. C.A. No. 27 of 1991 has been filed by the said applicant A. Shanmugham to set aside the various orders made in various claims as set out in annexure to the application, in so far as it relates to the closure compensation. 3. C.A. No. 206 of 1992 was filed by Mr. A. Shanmugham, in his personal capacity. C.A. No. 207 of 1992 was filed by him in his capacity as Vice President of Madras Pen and Ink Factory Workers' Union and representing the workmen of the company in liquidation. In the annexure to C.A. No. 207 of 1992, the names of claimants and other particulars viz., Claim Number, Claim amount, Am...
Mrs. Umamaheswari Vs. V. Sekar
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-20-1992
Reported in: AIR1992Mad272
ORDER1. The petitioner is the wife of the respondent. The above petition has been filed u/Ss. 3, 7 to 10 and 25 of the Guardian and Wards Act 1890 to declare the petitioner to be the guardian of the persons of the two female minors viz., 1. Vijayalakshmi and 2. Aswini alias Anuradha and to direct the respondent to give custody of the two female children to the petitioner.2. The marriage between the petitioner and the respondent was performed according to Hindu rites and ceremonies at the cost of the parents of the petitioner at Madras on 30-4-1990. The two minor children were born to them out of the said wedlock on 2-6-1981 and 5-7-1983 respectively. From her savings, the petitioner purchased two plots of house sites, one at Avadi and another at lyyappanthangal. The respondent, who was employed for a meagre salary with a real estate dealer suggested to the petitioner to dispose of the house site at Iyyappanthangal and purchase a small house at K. K. Nagar. According to his suggestion, ...
P. Somasundaram Chettiar and Etc. Vs. Committee of Management of P.T. ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-20-1992
Reported in: AIR1992Mad341
ORDER1. Application No. 3363 of 1991 in T.O.S. No. 3 of 1874 was filed by the very same petitioners in Application No. 5395 of 1991 to direct the respondents to enhance the maintenance and pension payable to each, applicants family from Rs. 60/- to Rs. 2000/-per month and direct the respondents to pay accordingly. This application was filed in this Court on 5th July, 1991. The respondents filed a counter-affidavit raising a preliminary objection slating that no proceedings are pending in T.O.S. No. 3 of 1874 and as such no application would lie in the said T.O.S. On 15-4-1875, the said T.O.S. No. 3 of 1874 was dismissed according to them. Later, the applicants in Application No. 3363 of 1991 have filed the present application No. 5395 of 1991 in T.O.S. No. 5 of 1974 for the very same relief requesting ihe respondents to enhance the maintenance and pension payable to each of the applicants family from Rs. 60/- to Rs. 2000/- per month and to direct them to pay accordingly. The above appl...
Gopalakrishna Trading Co. Vs. D. Baskaran
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-20-1992
Reported in: [1994]80CompCas53(Mad)
Janarthanam, J. 1. Gopalakrishna Trading Co., which is dealing in submersible pump sets, is situate at No. 116, Angappa Naicken Street, Madras-1. 2. Krishna Electricals and Hardwares, a partnership firm, is situate at No. 167-B, Nethaji Road, Manjakuppam, Cuddalore-607 001. One D. Baskaran is the managing partner of the said firm. 3. The said Baskaran in his capacity as managing partner, it is said, had been purchasing submersible pump sets from Gopalakrishna Trading Co. for quite long on credit basis and subsequently settling the account by the issuance of cheque for the purchases so made. On one occasion for the money due on the purchases so made, he appeared to have issued a cheque for Rs. 25,000 dated May 30, 1991, in favour of Gopalakrishna Trading Co. The cheque when presented by the said company on November 28, 1991, got bounced with an endorsement 'insufficient funds' on December 10, 1991. After complying with other formalities, it is said Gopalakrishna Trading Co. represented ...
Ramaswamy Vs. the Tahsildar Saidapet Taluk, Madras and Others
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-20-1992
Reported in: AIR1992Mad367
ORDERNainar Sundaram, C.J.1. The petitioner in W.P. Mp/ 665 of 1991 is the appellant in this writ appeal. The respondents in the writ petition are the respondents in this Writ Appeal. For the sake of convenience, we are referring (o the parties as per their nomenclature in the writ petition.2. The petitioner came to this court byway of the writ petition, projecting the following prayer:'For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, the petitioner herein prays that this Honourable Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order, or direction, specifically a writ of certiorarified mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India calling for the records of the impugned notice dated 31-12-1990 of the first-respondent issued u/S.6 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encorachment Act, quashing the same and also directing the respondents 1 to 4 to grant patta to the petitioner in respect of the portion of the land under his occupation in S.No. 320/2C Padi village, Saidapet Taluk or...
Noorjahan Vs. Sultan Rajia Alias Thaju and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-20-1992
Reported in: 1993ACJ742
A. Abdul Hadi, J.1. Both these appeals arise out of M.A.C.O.P. No. 104 of 1983 on the file of the District Judge, Madurai, relating to a motor accident that took place on 3.8.1982 at 9.00 p.m. near the bus stand of Periakulam, Madurai District, which resulted in the death of one Syed Abuthakir. The wife, child and parents of the abovesaid deceased filed the abovesaid O.P. claiming compensation of Rs. 1,00,000/- and the Tribunal below held that the driver of the bus was negligent in causing the accident and awarded compensation to the extent of Rs. 92,000/-. The owner of the bus in which the deceased was travelling is the appellant in C.M.A. No. 381 of 1985, while the abovesaid claimants are the appellants in C.M.A. No. 241 of 1990. The said C.M.A. No. 241 of 1990 has been filed only because the learned Tribunal below has restricted the liability of the insurance company, the 3rd respondent in the O.P. to Rs. 10,000/- out of the abovesaid total compensation of Rs. 92,000/-, on the groun...
Haran Jahveri Vs. Collector of Customs and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-20-1992
Reported in: 1992(40)ECC43
ORDERBakthavatsalam, J.1. The Writ petition is for the issue of the writ of mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to immediately allow clearance of the goods on recovering normal rate of customs duty to the petitioner as declared consequently and to on issue a detention certificate. 2. The Petitioner, who is an importer of dyes and chemicals, and is holding REP licence to import diverse quantity and quality of disperse dyes, entered negotiations with M/s. S.I. Group of Hong Kong, for the sale and supply of one metric ton of disperse dyes blue and one metric ton of disperse dyes red, manufactured and controlled by China. Accordingly the said suppliers by their invoices dated 15-8-91 and 4-9-1991 supplied the said goods and shipped through the vessel S.S. ACX LILY and Vessel Tokyo Beg v. 10/556 from Hongkong to Madras under Bill of lading Nos. NIKS 3480117209 and 79987113 respectively. According to the petitioner, before the said goods could be examined, the Officers of the 2nd responden...
Munuswami Chetty (Died) and Others Vs. Commissioner, H.R. and C.E. (Ad ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-09-1992
Reported in: AIR1993Mad144; (1993)IMLJ183
1. The unsuccessful plaintiffs, ten in number, are the appellants. Having initially failed before the authorities under the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959, hereinafter referred to as the Act, in their O. A. No. 20 of 1969 on the file of the Deputy Commissioner, H. R. & C.E. (Admn.) Department and the subsequent appeal, A. P. No. 56 of 1975, on the file of the Commissioner, H. R. & C.E. (Admn.) Department, they filed 0. S. No. 61 of 1979 on the file of the Sub Court, Tiruvallur, to set aside the order in A. P. No. 56 of 1975 and consequently to allow their petition, O. A. No. 20 of 1969. The said suit filed under Section 70 of the Act was dismissed and hence this appeal.2. The abovesaid authorities negatived the plaintiff's prayer for declaration that they are the hereditary trustees of the suit temple. According to the plaint, suit temple was built by the father of plaintiffs 1 and 2 with the funds supplied by the family of all plaintiffs in the year 1921, all of t...
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Rajammal and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-08-1992
Reported in: 1993ACJ486
A. Abdul Hadi, J.1. This appeal is by the insurance company against the award of the Claims Tribunal in M.C.O.P. No. 24 of 1984 for a sum of Rs. 76,800/- in favour of the claimant-respondent Nos. 1 to 4 herein, who are the legal representatives of the deceased, who died in the motor accident that took place on 10.1.1983 at 6.00 p.m. The vehicle involved in the accident is MDB 9318 and it knocked down the deceased while he was going by a cycle.2. Only a short question is involved in this appeal. As per the claim of the appellant insurance company, its liability is only limited to Rs. 50,000/-. But the Tribunal has not apportioned the above-said award amount accordingly. For not apportioning the award amount, the Tribunal relied on the decision in Mehta Madan Lai v. National Insurance Co. Ltd. 1983 ACJ 348 and has held that the owner of the vehicle and the insurance company are jointly and severally liable.3. But, the learned Counsel for the appellant argues that in the above-said case b...
M. Radhakrishna Rao Vs. A.B. Ahmed Basha and anr.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-08-1992
Reported in: (1992)2MLJ615
ORDERSrinivasan, J.1. These matters arise out of two petitions filed by the landlord, who is the petitioner in C.R.P. Nos. 1608 and 1625 of 1985, for fixing of fair rent under Section 4 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act 18 of 1960 as amended by Act XXIII of 1973. One of the petitions, viz., R.C.O.P. No. 3115 of 1982 relates to the two flats in the ground floor of Door No. 631, Thiruvottiyur High Road, Tondiarpet, Madras, occupied by A.B. Ahmed Basha, who is the respondent in C.R.P. No. 1608 of 1985 and petitioner in C.R,P. No. 478 and 479 of 1988. The other petition, viz., R.C.O.P. No. 3116 of 1982 relates to two flats in the first floor of the same building occupied by Manoharlal Sablok, respondent in C.R.P. No. 1625 of 1985. C.R.P. No. 1608 of 1985, 478 of 1988 and 479 of 1988 form one group as they pertain to one tenant viz., Ahmed Basha, occupying two flats in the ground floor. C.R.P. No. 1625 of 1985 and C.M.P. No. 14705 of 199l go together and they will be ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »