Chennai Court May 1991 Judgments
M. Paramull Charida and Others Etc. Vs. Mahendra Dadha and Others Etc.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-07-1991
Reported in: AIR1992Mad115; (1991)IMLJ538
ORDER1. Original Petition No. 205 of 1990 was filed by the three arbitrators u/ S. 14 sub-cl. (2) of the Indian Arbitration Act to receive the award dated 10-1-1990, the copy of the arbitration agreement, dated 12th Sept. 1989 and the documents filed as per the Schedule attached to the said original petition and to order notice to the respondents. The respondents 1 to 3 are the sons of late L. Milapchand Dadha. The arbitrators were appointed under an agreement, dated 12lh Sept. !989 entered into between the respondents herein and in the dispute between them. The disputes arose between the respondents, who are the sons of late L, Milapchand Dadha, following the death of their father on 11th October, 1976. The three arbitrators/ petitioners in Original Petition No. 205 of 1990 were appointed to decide the disputes arose between the respondents. The arbitration proceedings commenced on 12th Step. 1989 and concluded on 10th January, 1990, when the award was pronounced. According to the pet...
Tag this Judgment!Protchem Industries (India) Ltd., Represented by Its Managing Director ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-07-1991
Reported in: (1991)1MLJ519
Lakshmanan, J.1. This suit was filed by the plaintiff to pass an order of reference of the disputes between the plaintiff and the defendants to an Arbitrator to be appointed by this Court to adjudicate and decide the disputes arising out of the agreements, dated 1.5.1987,14.1.1988 and 24.4.1989 and for costs of the suit. The short facts are as follows:2. The plaintiff company entered into an agreement with the first defendant on 1.5.1987 for the transfer of technical know-how for the manufacture of Amino Acid Powder, L-Cystine and L-Tyrocine from and out of human hair. The first defendant also entered into an agreement dated 1.5.1987 to buy back of Amino Acid Powder, L-Cystine and L-Tyrocine manufactured by the plaintiff through the technical know-how transferred by the defendants. The agreement also included the provision for the supply of appropriate machinery by the defendants. The machineries were supplied in two consignments, but they were not found suitable. Hence, the plaintiff ...
Tag this Judgment!M. Parasmull Chordia, (Chairman/Arbitrator) and ors. Vs. Mahendra Dadh ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-07-1991
Reported in: (1991)1MLJ538
ORDERLakshmanan, J.1. Original Petition No 205 of 1990 was filed by the three arbitrators under Section 14, Sub-clause (2) of the Indian Arbitration Act to receive the award dated 10.1.1990, the copy of the arbitration agreement, dated 12th September, 1989, and the documents filed as per the schedule attached to the said original petition and to order notice to the respondents. The respondents 1 to 3 are the sons of late L. Milapchand Dadha. The arbitrators were appointed under an agreement, dated 12th September, 1989, entered into between the respondents herein and in the dispute between them. The disputes arose between the respondents, who are the sons of late L. Milapchand Dadha, following the death of their father on 11th October, 1976. The three arbitrators/petitioners in Original Petition No. 205 of 1990 were appointed to decide the disputes arose between the respondents. The arbitration proceedings commenced on 12th September, 1989, and concluded on 10th January, 1990, when the ...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- Next ›