Chennai Court September 1990 Judgments
Rekha Parameswari Alias Gnanambigal Muthiah Vs. Assistant Collector of ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-12-1990
Reported in: 1992CriLJ901; 1992(37)ECC105
ORDER1. Miss. Rekha Parameswari, a Sri Lankan national, stated to be falsely styled an Gananambikai Mukhaiya, holding a Sri Lankan passport, also stated to be a forged one, was a passenger bound for Colombo by Indian Airlines flight I.C. 573 on 21-2-1989. She proceeded for security check after customs clearance at the Madras International Airport. The lady Security Officer, while frisking her, felt that something was kept concealed on her person. She was therefore taken to a toilet and when her person was searched in the presence of two lady witnesses, her undergarment jetty was found bulging, creating a suspicion that something was kept concealed within. On being asked to remove the jetty for examination, she did so and a polythene bag was kept in between two jetties stitched together and it was found to contain some brown powder, suspected to be narcotic substance weighing 500 gms. When questioned, she was stated to have admitted that the said powder was brown sugar and the same was ...
Tag this Judgment!Lakshmi Packaging Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Asstt. C.C.E., Salem Division
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-12-1990
Reported in: 1997(91)ELT557(Mad)
Raju, J.1. The above writ appeals have been filed against the common order of the learned Single Judge dated 4-8-1986 passed in W.P. Nos. 49 and 50 of 1981 dismissing the writ petitions filed by the appellants. The appellants, before us have filed W.P. No. 49 of 1981 for a writ of prohibition, prohibiting the respondents from acting in any manner in pursuance of the Show Cause Notice OC No. 2454/80, dated 9-12-1980 issued by the second respondent, and W.P. No. 50 of 1981 for a writ of prohibition, prohibiting the respondents from acting in any manner in pursuance of the Demand Notice OC No. 2425/80, dated 4-12-1980 issued by the second respondent. 2. The appellants are carrying on business under the name and style of Lakshmi Packaging Private Ltd., at Salem. In the affidavit filed in support of the writ petitions before this Court, the appellants averred that the appellants carry on the job work of printing on base papers, as per customers' specifications and such printed materials are...
Tag this Judgment!V. Veeraraghavan Vs. P.O., Labour Court, Coimbatore and anr.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-12-1990
Reported in: (1992)IILLJ137Mad
ORDER1. This writ petition is filed under 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a writ of certiorari calling for the records of the first in I.A. No. 733 of 1987 in Petition No. 395 of 1955 dated December 18, 1987 and Computation petition No. 395 of 1988, dated February 8, 1988 and quash the same. 2. The facts is disclosed from the filed by the petitioner can be briefly stated as follows. The petitioner is the proprietor of the permanent theatre known as Gobald Theatre at Sathyamangalam. From 1957 onwards, the second respondent was employed in the petitioner's theatre as Projector Operator. According to the petitioner, during the tenure of his office, the second respondent was very irregular in his attendance as he was engaged in other part-time jobs at that time. He applied for leave on January 13, 1981 and January 14, 1981 and the leave was granted Again, he applied for leave on two days on medical ground. He was asked to produce the medical certificate in proof of the...
Tag this Judgment!G. Prabhavathy Rebakkal Vs. Registrar, High Court, Madras and Others
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-10-1990
Reported in: (1992)IILLJ231Mad; (1991)IIMLJ292
ORDERNainar Sundaram, J. 1. This writ appeal is directed against the order of the learned single Judge in W.P. No. 16169 of 1989. The petitioner in the writ petition is the appellant in this writ appeal. The respondents in the writ petition are the respondents in the writ appeal. We are referring the parties as per their nomenclature in the writ petition. One J. A. George, who was functioning as the V Judge, Court of Small Causes, Madras, died on September 4, 1978, leaving his wife, Glory George, and two daughters, Julie Chandravathi and Prabhavathi Rebakkal, the petitioner. In view of one legal hurdle, of course based on facts, which was presented by the petitioner in getting reliefs at the hands of this court, there is no need to set forth the entire gamut of the factual materials of the case. On November 11, 1988 the petitioner had the benefit of appointment as a Junior Assistant temporarily in the Court of Small Causes, Madras on compassionate grounds. This order was made by the se...
Tag this Judgment!Dr. K.C. Ramakrishnan Vs. Inrays Now Known as Inrays Sales Pvt. Ltd. a ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-10-1990
Reported in: (1991)369MLJ1
ORDERSrinivasan, J.1. These three revision petitions arise under the following circumstances. The petitioner was the first defendant in O.S. No. 435 of 1979 filed by the State Bank of India through its branch at No. 160 Village Road, Madras-34. It was a suit on a mortgage. At the instance of the petitioner, the second defendant M/s. Inrays Sales Limited, Faridabad, Haryana State was impleaded under the provisions of Section 8-A of the Code of Civil Procedure. A preliminary decree was passed on 31.3.1983. There was a provision in the decree that the 2nd defendant shall pay to the first defendant-petitioner Herein a sum of Rs. 48,761.64 with subsequent interest till payment.2. The petitioner filed E.P. No. 25 of 1986 for issue of a prohibitory order to the garnishee mentioned therein and to attach the funds belonging to the second defendant referred to above and lying in current account with the said garnishee under Order 21, Rule 46 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The Manager, State Ban...
Tag this Judgment!G. Prabhavathy Rebakkal Vs. the Registrar, High Court and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-10-1990
Reported in: (1991)2MLJ292
Nainar Sundaram, J.1. This writ appeal is directed against the order of the learned single Judge in W.P. No. 16169 of 1989. The petitioner in the writ petition is the appellant in this writ appeal. The respondents in the writ petition are the respondents in this writ appeal. We are referring to the parties as per their nomenclature in the writ petition. One J.A. George, who was functioning as the V Judge, court of Small Causes, Madras, died on 4.9.1978, leaving his wife, Glory George and two daughters, Julie Chandravathi and Prabhavathi Rebakkal, the petitioner. In view of one legal hurdle, of course based on facts, which has presented to the petitioner in getting reliefs at the hands of this Court, there is no need to set forth the entire gamut of the factual materials of the case. On 11.11.1988 the petitioner had the benefit of appointment as a Junior Assistant temporarily in the Court of Small Causes, Madras, on compassionate grounds. This order was made by the second respondent. On...
Tag this Judgment!The Roman Catholic Society of the Brothers of the Sacred Heart of Jesu ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-10-1990
Reported in: (1991)2MLJ440
ORDERNainar Sundaram, J.1. The petitioners in these writ petitions are Institutions. Their schools have recognition for the various educational courses in respect of which aid is being asked for. In view of the fact, broad contentions built on Article 30, and in particular Article 30(2) of the Constitution of India are being projected in support of the request for the grant of aid for the various educational courses run by the minority schools, we do not propose to go into the minute factual details with reference to each case. Suffice it to state that we are concerned with minority schools and their various educational courses with which we are concerned, have the benefit of recognition. Article 30(1) speaks about the right of all minorities, whether based on religion or language, to establish and administer educational institutions of their choice. Certain provisions of the Tamil Nadu Recognised Private Schools (Regulation) Act, 1973 (Tamil Nadu Act 29 of 1974), hereinafter referred ...
Tag this Judgment!Gurunatha Pandithan Vs. the Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitab ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-10-1990
Reported in: (1991)2MLJ409
Abdul Hadi, J.1. Against the dismissal of O.S. No. 536 of 1977 on the file of Sub Court, Madurai, the plaintiff has preferred this appeal. This suit is under Section 70 of the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959 for setting aside the order of the Commissioner under the said Act dated 10.2.1977 in the plaintiffs own appeal in A.P. No. 153 of 1975. The said order of the Commissioner confirmed the dismissal of O.A. No. 15 of 1973 by the Deputy Commissioner under the said Act. The said O.A. was filed by the plaintiff under Section 63(b) and (c) of the above said Act for a declaration that the charity mentioned in the will dated 12.12.1937 executed by one Ammakutti Ammal was not a 'religious endowment' (as defined under Section 6(17) of the said Act) and that, even assuming the said charity, was a religious endowment, the plaintiff was the hereditary trustee of the said endowment.2. The Deputy Commissioner, while dismissing the said O.A. No. 15 of 1973, held that ...
Tag this Judgment!C.A. Baloo and Another Vs. Union of India and Others
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-07-1990
Reported in: [1992]197ITR545(Mad)
Arunachalam, J. 1. The petitioner in the first batch, Crl. M. P. No. 7552 of 1985, etc., is M/s. Jayalakshmi Financiers represented by its proprietor, C. A. Baloo. In the second batch. Crl. M. P. No. 7962 of 1985, etc., the petitioner is M/s. Samarias Finance, Madras. The respondent in all these petitions, in both batches, is the Assistant Director of Inspection (Investigation), Office of the Deputy Director, Inspection, Income-tax Department, Madras-34. 2. The first batch of cases are referable respectively to C. C. Nos. 187 to 197 of 1985, pending on the file of the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (E. O. II), Egmore, Madras. The second batch of cases in the serial order are referable to C. C. Nos. 283 to 318 of 1985, pending on the file of the same learned Magistrate. 3. Prosecutions have been initiated against the respective petitioners in these petitions by the respondent alleging violation of the provisions of section 269SS of the Income-tax Act, 1961, punishable under se...
Tag this Judgment!Association of University Teachers Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and anr.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-07-1990
Reported in: (1991)IILLJ31Mad
Raju, J. 1. These batches of cases, some writ petitions as well as writ appeals, are taken up for consideration together since they involve identical questions of law and common submissions have been made by counsel appearing on either side. The consideration of some of these cases individually on merits will ultimetely depend upon the decision that we render on the legal issues. 2. The constitutional validity of Sections 2(7), 11, 24(3) and 32 of the Tamil Nadu Private Colleges (Regulation) Act, 1976 is being questioned by the respective petitioners in the above proceedings. The facts that all the educational institutions involved in the these proceedings are minority institutions and they get 100% State aid in respect of teaching grant and 80% in respect of non-teaching grant and all of them are affiliated to one or the other Universities within the State of Tamil Nadu are beyond controversy. 3. The Government of Tamil Nadu decided to regulate the conditions of service of teachers em...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »