Chennai Court March 1989 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Engg. Exports Promotion Council Vs. Asian Wire Ropes Ltd.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-01-1989
Reported in: 1992(40)ECC106; 1990(47)ELT336(Mad)
S. Mohan, Offg. C.J.1. All these writ appeals can be dealt with under a common judgment since the point in issue is one and the same. 2. The first respondent herein, namely, Asian Wire Ropes Ltd., preferred W.P. 3994 of 1988 for a writ of Certiorari to quash the orders of the third respondent therein namely, the Engineering Export Promotion Council, dated 2-9-1987 W.P. No. 3995 of 1985 was filed for the issue of a writ of mandamus directing respondents 2 to 4 therein to reimburse the sum of Rs. 4,53,007.01 being the balance of amount due to it under the International Price Reimbursement Scheme, 1981. W.P. No. 3996 of 1988 was for the issue of a writ of Mandamus directing respondents 2 to 4 therein to reimburse a sum of Rs. 1,95,859.40 due under the same Scheme. W.P. Nos. 3997, 3998 and 3999 of 1988 were filed for writs of mandamus against respondents 2 to 4 there in claiming reimbursement in a sum of Rs. 61,676.70; Rs. 19,07,421/- and Rs. 11,67,327.90p. respectively under the same Sche...
V. Govindarajulu Vs. T. Govindarajulu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-01-1989
Reported in: (1989)1MLJ482
ORDERK.M. Natarajan, J.1. This revision is directed by the tenant, against the order passed by the appellate authority, Coimbatore, dismissing the appeal and confirming the order passed by the Rent Controller.2. The facts which arc necessary for the disposal of this revision can be briefly stated as follows:The respondent (landlord) filed a petition for eviction against the petitioner herein (tenant) on the grounds of wilful default payment of rent and bona fide, requirement of the building for the purpose of demolition and reconstruction. He also filed an application, I.A. No. 147 of 1987 under Section 18-A of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, as amended, to appoint a Commissioner to examine the respondent at his residence contending that he suffered paralytic stroke and as such he is incapacitated for more than four years, that he is unable to move about from the house and that he cannot appear in court and depose in the case. The said application is resisted by ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›