Chennai Court December 1989 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dr. S. Arumugham Vs. the Government of Tamil Nadu Represented by the S ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-04-1989
Reported in: (1990)1MLJ190
ORDERBakthavatsalam J.1. The prayer in the writ petition is to issue a writ of mandamus restraining the respondents, their officers and men from interfering with the petitioner's possession and enjoyment or evicting the petitioner from the flat B-1 in Lloyds Estate. Lloyds Road, Madras-14 and further to direct the 2nd respondent to allot the said flat on rental basis to the petitioner under the Public Quota and render justice.2. The petitioner before me was an Additional Director, Animal Husbandry Department. On 29.10.1984, the Government directed the 2nd respondent-Tamil Nadu Housing Board to allot 'A' type flat at B-1, Lloyds Estate to the petitioner. Accordingly the petitioner was allotted a flat and he entered into a rental agreement with the 2nd respondent-Board. It is alleged in the affidavit that the petitioner was periodically addressing the respondents for allotment of a house to him on rental basis under the Public Quota System, inasmuch as he does not own a house at Madras a...
Southern Roadways Ltd., Represented by Its Secretary and anr. Vs. C. P ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-01-1989
Reported in: (1989)2MLJ497
ORDERAbdul Hadi, J.1. These civil revision petitions are by the same defendants in the respective suits against the respective plaintiffs therein, seeking to set aside Clause 2 of the order dated 24.10.1989 in the respective interlocutory applications filed therein. The said interlocutory applications were filed by the respective plaintiffs for interim injunction.Those interlocutory applications are I.A.Nos.932 to 959 of 1989 in O.S.Nos.1330 to 1357 of 1989 on the file of the District Munsifs Court, Thirumangalam. The suits are by different employees of the same defendants and they inter alia sought for orders of permanent injunction, restraining the defendants from giving effect to the relevant transfer orders passed by the defendants against the said employees. The trial Court held in Clause 1 of the respective orders in each of the said interlocutory applications that it had no jurisdiction to try each of the said interlocutory applications. But, in Clause 2 of the respective orders...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›