Chennai Court October 1988 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dalmia Cement (Bharat) Limited Vs. Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Lalg ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-03-1988
Reported in: [1989]73STC167(Mad)
1. These writ petitions have been filed to call for the records on the file of the first respondent, the Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Lalgudi, and for quashing the order in TNGST No. 115128/81-82 dated 12th May, 1983 and TNGST No. 115128/82-83 dated 14th May, 1983 (April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November, December, 1982 and January and February, 1983).It is, inter alia, stated in the affidavits accompanying these writ petitions, sworn to by the Chief Accountant of the petitioners-company Dalmia Cement (Bharat) Limited thus :The petitioners are manufacturers of cement which is taxable under serial No. 34 of the First Schedule to the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959. The petitioners are the assessees on the file of the Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Lalgudi, the first respondent herein, under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 and the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. Cement manufactured and marketed by the petitioners is governed by the provisions of the ...
P.L. Sivanappan Vs. Government of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-03-1988
Reported in: AIR1989Mad338
Nainar Sundaram, J.1. The appellant applied for assignment of an extent of land on outright sale for putting up a permanent cinema theatre in Bhavanisagar township area. By G.O. Ms. No. 114 Public Works Department, dt. 30-1-1981, the respondent directed alienation of one acre of land. S.No. 279 in Bhavanisagar township area to the appellant subject to the collection of double the market value of the land. On 25-6-1981, without assigning any reason, G.O. No. 114 dt. 30-1-1981 was cancelled by the respondent. This obliged the appellant to come to this Court by way of W.P. 5551 of 1981, impeaching the order of cancellation, Padmanabhan J. did not accept any of the contentions advanced on behalf of the appellant seeking interference in writ jurisdiction and the learned single Judge dismissed the writ petition. This writ appeal is directed against the order of the learned single Judge.2. Before us, Mr. V. R. Rajasekharan, learned counsel for the appellant, would submit that the respondent h...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next ›