Skip to content

Chennai Court December 1986 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Dec 02 1986

Arignar Anna Bus Stand Small Scale Retail Trader's Association, Madura ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-02-1986

Reported in: AIR1988Mad71; (1987)IIMLJ181

M.N. Chandurkar, C.J. 1. This appeal which arises against an interim order raises a question as to the nature of the right of certain persons who utilise the premises of Anna Bus Stand at Madurai for doing their business in small mobile shops. The appeal itself has been argued at considerable length and since any decision on the question as to whether the original petitioner was entitled to interim injunction or not would really conclude the questions raised in the writ petition, with the consent of the learned counsel for the petitioner appellant and the learned Advocate General who appears for the Municipal Corporation we are disposing of the writ petition itself.2. Admittedly, at the Anna Bus stand and inside the actual Bus stand where the buses are parked and out of which the buses keep on coming and going, members of the petitioner-appellant Association carry on their business of selling articles such as fruits, drinks and snacks. These articles are kept on mobile platforms which ...


Dec 02 1986

Kalpana Lamps and Components Private Limited, by Its General Manager V ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-02-1986

Reported in: (1987)1MLJ310

ORDERV. Ramaswami, J.1. M/S. Zenith Lamps & Electricals Ltd. were Ordered to be wound up in Company Petition No. 50 of 1971. As per the Orders of the court, the Official Liquidator brought the company for sale. The Petitioners' bid for purchase of the same for a consideration of Rs. 61,79,301 was accepted by the Court. There were certain directions relating to payment of the sale consideration which have been complied with. In Company Application No. 2586 of 1978 etc. while accepting the highest offer for purchase of the entire unit of the company, the petitioner-company was directed to obtain necessary clearance from the State Government under the Tamil Nadu Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1978 (Tamil Nadu Act 24 of 1978)(herein after referred to as the Act). On the basis that the petitioner had complied with the conditions relating to payment of the sale consideration, the petitioner - company was put in possession of the unit on 15.2.1979 and the petitioner had been running...


Dec 02 1986

G. Ganesamoorthy, the Secy. Manager of Rangaswamy Memorial Primary Sch ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-02-1986

Reported in: (1987)2MLJ21

ORDERS. Nainar Sundaram, J.1. The management of a private school governed by the Tamil Nadu Recognised Private Schools Regulation Act, 1973 hereinafter referred to as the Act and represented by its Secretary-cum-Manager is the petitioner in these two writ petitions. The 3rd respondent in each of the two writ petitions was a teacher under the employment of the petitioner. They are different from one another. They were dismissed on disciplinary action by the petitioner. However, the second respondent on appeals by the teachers countenanced their pleas, set aside the orders of dismissal and restored the teachers to services. The petitioner preferred appeals to the first respondent. The teachers filed applications calling upon the petitioner to deposit the emoluments due to them as per Section 44(1) of the Act. On 18.8.1980, the first respondent directed the petitioner to make the deposits on or before 8.9.1980. It must be noted, the petitioner at this time had not filed its counters and m...


Dec 02 1986

Arignar Anna Bus Stand Small Scale Retail Traders Association, Through ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-02-1986

Reported in: (1987)2MLJ181

ORDERM.N. Chandurkar, C.J.1. This appeal which arises against an interim order raises a question as to the nature of the right of certain persons who utilise the premises of Anna Bus Stand at Madurai for doing their business in small mobile shops. The appeal itself has been argued at considerable length and since any decision on the question as to whether the original petitioner was entitled to interim injunction or not would really conclude the questions raised in the writ petition. With the consent of the learned Counsel for the petitioner-appellant and the learned Advocate General who appears for the Municipal Corporation we are disposing of the writ petition itself.2. Admittedly, at the Anna Bus Stand and inside the actual bus stand where the buses are parked and out of which the buses keep on coming and going, members of the petitioner-appellant Association carry on their business of selling articles such as fruits, drinks and snacks. These articles are kept on mobile platforms wh...


  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial