Chennai Court October 1978 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Regional Director, Employees' State Insurance Corporation Vs. M.M. Rub ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-06-1978
Reported in: (1979)2MLJ74
ORDERV. Sethuraman, J.1. This is an appeal against the judgment in E.I.O.P. No. 14 of 1974, dated 26th November, 1975 of the Employees' State Insurance Court, Madras. The judgment came to be delivered on a petition under Section 75 of the Employees' State Insurance Act, praying for a declaration that the production bonus paid to the employees in accordance with the provisions of a settlement dated 13th April, 1970, was not wages as defined under Section 2(22) of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948. The respondent is a factory in Madras where, foam rubber, articles are manufactured with the help of 150 workmen. The employees are insured under Section 38 of the Act. Contribution as contemplated by the provisions of the Act) was recovered from the wages of all the insured persons and the amount so recovered along with the employers contribution was remitted to the Corporation by the respondent. On 13th April, 1970, there was a memorandum of settlement under Section 12(3) of the Indus...
V. Vatsala Vs. Official Assignee of Madras Representing the Estate of ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-05-1978
Reported in: (1979)1MLJ210
T. Ramaprasada Rao, C.J.1. The question that arises in this Civil Revision Petition centres round a legal contention and a factual contention. The petitioner is the tenant who came to occupy a land bearing Municipal Door No. 109-D/6-A Mount Road, Madras. She was admittedly inducted into possession of such land along with the machinery embedded thereto by one Namasivayam. This was under the lease deed Exhibit P-1, dated 14th January, 1972. Everything went on alright until one Than-davan laid title to the machinery denied by Namasivayam. The leasehold interest as recognised by the tenant and which vested in Namasivayam was undisturbed till about July, 1972. On 27th July, 1972, it appears that one Jagadisan claiming a permanent title to the property in question as the purchaser of Door No. 109-D.6, Mount Road called upon the tenant-petitioner 10 attorn the tenancy to him under threat of Civil and Criminal Proceedings if his demand was not conceded to. It appears that the tenant afraid of ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›