Chennai Court July 1977 Judgments
K.K. Jacob (Minor) Vs. the Madurai University and anr.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-29-1977
Reported in: AIR1978Mad315; (1978)1MLJ440
Sethuraman, J.1. This is an appeal from the judgment of Mohan J. declining to admit W. P. 4440 of 1976. The petitioner was a student of Loyola School, Trivandrum and had appeared for an examination conducted by the Council for the Indian Schools Certificate Examination, New Delhi. In the said examination, the petitioner had obtained over 40 per cent of marks in all subjects except Mathematics in which he had secured 35 per cent. The authorities conducting the said examination, issued a certificate to the petitioner stating that he had passed the said examination. The petitioner applied for admission to two institutions, namely, Mar Ivanios College, Trivandrum affiliated to the Kerala University and also to the Scott Christian College, Nagarcoil affiliated to the Madurai University. He got admission first from the College at Trivandrum and he paid the sum of Rs. 175 for the first term fees. Subsequently he got an admission card from the Scott Christian College, Nagarcoil. After getting ...
Tag this Judgment!Jayaramachandra Iyer Vs. Thulasi Ammal and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-26-1977
Reported in: AIR1978Mad95
P. Govindan Nair, C.J. 1. This is an appeal by the plaintiff in a suit for partition, and the only contest in this appeal is about the partibility of one item of the properties, namely, Item No. 1 of the A schedule, which was acquired in the name of the deceased husband of the first defendant under the sale deed Exhibit B-1, dated 20-6-1963. There were other items of properties scheduled to the plaint, and no dispute arises in this appeal regarding their partibility. As regards item No. 1 of the A schedule, it was held by the trial Court that it belonged to the husband of the first defendant, the deceased Dandapani Iyer, end that the property was his self-acquired property and not joint family property. The appeal by the plaintiff before this court having failed, he has come up before this court by way of Letters Patent Appeal. 2. On behalf of the appellant counsel contended that there was clear evi-dence available in the case about the existence of sufficient nucleus for the acquisiti...
Tag this Judgment!C. Vasantha Vs. S.C. Pandian
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-26-1977
Reported in: AIR1978Mad138; (1978)1MLJ1
Ramaprasada Rao, J. 1. This appeal is against the order of Sethuraman J. dated 10-4-1974. The appellant, as plaintiff in C. S. No. 70 of 1968, filed an application under rder XX, Rule 12, C.P.C., and Bought for an enquiry into the mesne profits of the suit property admittedly in the possession of the respondent, from the date of occupation till the data of delivery of possession.2. Certain relevant facts which led to the application may be noticed. Initially there was a controversy as to whether the plaintiff was entitled to the suit property. The plaintiff based her title on the Will of one Solachi dated4-12-1961. This was resisted by Solachi's husband who set up another Will dated 16-1-1962 of his own wife. A contest therefore ensued between the plaintiff and her sister as legatees under the Will of Solachi dated 4-l2-1961, as propounded by them and the claim of Ramiah based on the will dated 16-1-1962 again said to be the Will of the same Solachi. On a full enquiry this court in T. ...
Tag this Judgment!S. Ramaswami Vs. the Commissioner, Corporation of Madras
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-22-1977
Reported in: AIR1978Mad141
ORDERRamanujam, J.1. These two revision petitions have been filed by one and the same person. He has challenged the orders of the Court of Small Causes, Madras, fixing the rental value of the petitioner's premises No. 5D/1 Gandhi Irwin Road, Egmore, Madras at Rs. 525 and for premises No. 5D/2 Gandhi Irwin Road, Egmore, Madras at Rs. l,350 for the second half year 1970-71.2. The rental values of premises Nos. 5D/1 and 5D/2 were originally fixed by the Commissioner of Corporation ofMadras at Rs. 867 and Rs. 2,232 respectively. On appeal to the Taxation Appeals Committee these rental values were reduced to Rs. 650 and Rs. 1.700respectively. On further appeal to the Court of Small Causes, Madras, the rental values had been reduced to Rs. 525 and Rs. 1,350 respectively. In these revisions the basis adopted for fixing the rental value has been challenged by the petitioner on the ground that the fair rent payable in respect of the buildings under the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Le...
Tag this Judgment!S. Ramaswamy Vs. the Commissioner, Corporation of Madras
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-22-1977
Reported in: (1977)2MLJ457
ORDERG. Ramanujam, J.1. These two revision petitions have been filed by one and the same person. He has challenged the orders of the Court of Small Causes, Madras fixing the rental value of the petitioner's premise's No. 5D/1, Gandhi Irwin Road, Egmore, Madras at Rs. 525 and for premises No. 5D/2, Gandhi Irwin Road, Egmore, Madras at Rs. 1,350 for the second half year 1970-1971.2. The rental values of premises Nos. 5D/1 and 5D/2 were ordinarily fixed by the Commissioner of Corporation of Madras, at Rs. 867 and Rs. 2,232 respectively. On appeal to the Taxation Appeals Committee these rental values were reduced to Rs. 650 and Rs. 1,700, respectively. On further1 appeal to the Court of Small Causes, Madras, the rental values had been reduced to Rs. 525 and Rs. 1,350, respectively. In these revisions the basis adopted for fixing the rental value has been challenged by the petitioner on the ground that the fair rent payable in respect of the buildings under the provisions of the Tamil Nadu ...
Tag this Judgment!K. Mohideen Ibrahim Vs. M. Muhammed Abdullah
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-21-1977
Reported in: AIR1978Mad97; (1978)1MLJ386
Suryamurthy, J.1. This is an appeal by the plaintiff from the judgment and decree of the learned District Judge, Ramanathapuram at Madurai dismissing A. S. No. 121 of 1975 on the file of his court and confirming the judgment of the learned Subordinate Judge, Ramanathapuram at Madurai, dismissing O. S. 75 of 1973, a suit instituted by the plaintiff for declaration that the suit wall marked AB in the sketch annexed to the plaint is the exclusive wall of the plaintiff, for declaration that the plaintiff is entitled to right of easement for free flow of light and air through the windows marked W-3 to W-7 in the aforesaid sketch, for a permanent injunction restraining the defendant and his men from interfering in any way with the plaintiff's right to light and air through the said windows and for a mandatory injunction directing the defendant to remove the terraced portion of the building immediately west of the windows W-1 and W-2 and the constructions put up by him west of the windows W-3...
Tag this Judgment!indo French Pharmaceutical Co. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-20-1977
Reported in: 1978(2)ELT478(Mad)
Ramanujam, J.1. This case involves the scope and ambit of tariff item 14-E of the First Schedule to Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 and rules framed thereunder. The petitioner is a manufacturer of pharmaceutical products at Nanganallur, Madras. Some of the pharmaceutical products manufactured by it are liable to excise duty and others are not excisable. For the manufacture of such of those pharmaceutical products which are excisable, the petitioner has taken out a licence under the said Act. The items that attract the excise duty are governed by the tariff item 14-E of the First Schedule to the Central Excise Act. As required by the licence, the petitioner furnished the lables attached to the products manufactured in its factory, both excisable and non-excisable, along with a proforma in triplicate on 11.02.1967. It also undertook to supply to the Department in advance the labels of new preparations excisable or non-excisable, manufactured for sale in future. On receipt of the said ...
Tag this Judgment!Sri Sai Baba and ors. Vs. M.L. Hanumantha Rao
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-20-1977
Reported in: (1980)2MLJ518
G. Ramanujam, J.1. Since some of the issues involved in both the suits are the same, there has been a joint trial by consent of all the parties and they are being disposed of by a common judgment.2. C.S. No. 126 of 1972 : This Suit has been filed by four plaintiffs, viz., (1) the deity, Sri Sai Baba, (2) Sri Sathya Sai Mandali, represented by its trustees, (3) M. L. Sampathkumar, and (4) ML. Ramakrishnan, for : (i) delivery of vacant possession of certain portions of premises No. 13. Veeraraghava Mudali Street, alias Big Street, Triplicane, Madras-5, hereinafter referred to as the suit house, from defendants 1 to 6 and defendants 7 to 10 or their tenants; (ii) for payment of mesne profits in a sum of Rs. 18,000 for a period of three years prior to the suit; and (iii) for payment of future mesne profits at the same rate from the date of suit till date of delivery of possession.3. Plaintiffs 3 and 4 and defendants 1 and 2 are the sons of one, M. J Loganatha Mudaliar. The 7th defendant is...
Tag this Judgment!Janakiram Mills Limited Vs. Additional Commissioner for Workmen's Comp ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-18-1977
Reported in: (1978)IILLJ241Mad
1. On 9th April, 1973, a notice under Section 9A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, was issued by the writ petitioner management which is to the following effect :ANNEXURENotice under Section 9A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, dated 9th April, 1973.Change Proposed;Revision of work-loads and wages for the workers in bundling department shown below :S. No. and Name Ticket Designation No. 1. K. Ramachandra 1 Weigher-cwm-Naidu presser2. O. Rangasami 2 PresserNaidu3. S. Balakrishnama 3 Do.Raja4. P. Veerappa Thevar 4 KnotterExplanation :The present work-loads in the building department has been in force, since the last 10 to 12 years, whereas the work-loads in all other departments of mills like preparatory, spinning, reeling, etc., have been revised to a large extent.2. It is absolutely essential that rationalisation is carried out, in the above department, especially when the cost of production has gone very high on account of the high dearness allowance and increased cost of stor...
Tag this Judgment!Booraswami Vs. Rajakannu and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-15-1977
Reported in: (1978)1MLJ248
V. Sethuraman, J.1. This is an appeal filed by the plaintiff in O.S. No. 107 of 1969 on the file of the Court of the Subordinate Judge of Chidambaram. There was one Rengasami Vandayar, who died in or about 1940. His four sons are Booraswami, the plaintiff, Rajakannu, the first defendant, Chinnadurai, the second defendant and Dharmalinga, the third defendant. He owned certain properties. According to the plaintiff the four sons of Rengasami Vandayar were living as members of a Hindu undivided family till about 1964. In that year there was a division of the movables and the respective brothers started separate messes. The parties were, it is said, put in possession of the properties of the joint family for the purpose of convenient enjoyment. The second defendant was alleged to have entered into partition with his sons, defendants 4 to 6, later on under which some of the joint family properties were sought to be divided. According to the plaintiff, some properties had been purchased in t...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »