Chennai Court August 1975 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Hindustan Aluminium Corporation Ltd. Vs. Nainsukhdas Baldeodas by Part ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-07-1975
Reported in: (1976)2MLJ323
S. Mohan, J.1. This is an application seeking stay under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act hereinafter referred to as 'The Act'. With regard to the six contracts forming the subject-matter of the suit, items 1 and 3 are governed by the arbitration agreement, the warding of which is as follows:.shall, in the first instance, be referred to arbitration of the Indian Chamber of Commerce, Calcutta....With regard to the contracts relating to items 2, 4, 5 and 6 of the plaint Schedule, the relevant clause is to the effect:.may, in the first instance, be referred to arbitration of the North India Chamber of Commerce, Allahabad....Notwithstanding the difference between the first and the second clauses in so far as the first using the word 'shall' and the second containing the word 'may', this is a fit case where a stay ought to be granted irrespective of the language used, because the intention of the parties was that the matter should be referred to arbitration.2. This is opposed by the respon...
N.V. Panchapakesan Vs. K. Swaminathan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-06-1975
Reported in: (1976)1MLJ338
T. Ramaprasada Rao, J.1. As against the judgment and decree of the City Civil Court in A.S. No. 230 of 1972 the present revision petition has been filed by the landlord. The suit property said to be measuring about 48' 7' on the road side and about 49' in depth situate in No. 12, Doraiswami Road, T. Nagar, was leased out by the petitioner to the respondent as a vacant site. In the course of occupation the respondent who took the premises for conducting firewood business put up sheds thereon. In 1962 the petitioner filed a suit for eviction and the respondent in turn filed an application under Section 9 of the Tamil Nadu City Tenants Protection Act, claiming benefits thereunder : There was a controversy as to whether the tenant was entitled to such benefits. Finally in C.R.P. No. 1887 of 1965 disposed of by this Court on 11th February, 1971 the right of the tenant to secure the benefits under the Tamil Nadu City Tenants Protection Act, were affirmed. Thereafter, I.A. No. 12272 of 1971 w...
Union of India (Uoi) (Represented by the Commissioner of Income-tax) V ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-05-1975
Reported in: [1977]106ITR836(Mad)
Mohan, J. 1. The facts leading to these applications may be shortly stated as follows:The Hindu Bank Karur Ltd., Karur, the first respondent, went into voluntary liquidation and was taken up for winding up on October 28, 1963. There were certain proceedings under the Income-tax Act and the company was assessed for the assessment year 1963-64, a sum of Rs. 10,853.55 by way of income-tax and super-tax. The said assessment was appealed against, but without success. Ultimately, by the order in T.C. No. 6 of 1973 [Hindu Bank Karur Ltd. v. Addl. Commissioner of Income-tax : [1976]103ITR553(Mad) ], this assessment became conclusive when the said tax case was dismissed on April 25, 1975. On August 18, 1964, the liquidator of the company filed in the office of the Registrar of Companies, a statement as required under the provisions of Section 555(3) of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the ' said Act '), stating that it appeared that a sum of Rs. 20,542.50 was payable to one ...
State by Public Prosecutor Vs. Chelliah Filial and anr.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-01-1975
Reported in: 1976CriLJ1509
Ratnavel Pandian, J.1. The State represented by the Public Prosecutor has preferred this appeal against the judgment of the learned Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sattur in C. C. No. 26 of 1974 on his file, acquitting the accused of the offence under Sections 7 and 16 (1) read with Section 2 (1) (j) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act.2. It is the case of the prosecution that on 13-11-1973 at about 5-00 P. M. in Door No. 176, No. 4 Road, Sattur, in the coffee hotel of the 1st accused, the 2nd accused was found selling Halwa which was intended for human consumption and which contained coal tar dye. It was not permitted for use in any food article for human consumption.3. The prosecution examined one witness, i.e., P.W. 1 who is the Food Inspector. P.W. 1 testified that he visited the 1st accused's hotel and purchased 300 grams of Halwa, divided the same into three parts, put the same in three clean dry bottles and one bottle was sent to the Public Analyst and on his report (...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next ›