Chennai Court January 1971 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Damodaraswami Naicker Vs. Sundararajan and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-06-1971
Reported in: (1972)1MLJ346
S. Ganesan, J.1. The judgment-debtor Damodarasami Naicker is the appellant herein and he is aggrieved that the Courts below have upheld the contention of the respondents-petitioners that E.P. No. 546 of 1966 filed by the latter on 6th October, 1966 is in time.2. One Chinnamuthu Naicker whose legal representatives are the respondents herein obtained a decree in O.S. No. 434 of 1955 on the file of the District Munsif's Court, Udumalpet on 9th July, 1956 against the appellant herein. The first E.P. No. 986 of 1957 filed by Chinnamuthu Naicker was dismissed on 12th October, 1957, but the attachment was directed to continue for two months. The second E.P. No. 1515 of 1957 filed by him was similarly dismissed on 25th March, 1958, but here again there was a direction that the attachment would continue for three months. On 24th April, 1966, Chinnamuthu Naicker died; and on 6th October, 1966the respondents herein as the legal representatives of Chinnamuthu Naicker have filed the present E.P. No...
In Re: Self Help Private Industrial Estate Private Ltd.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-05-1971
Reported in: [1972]42CompCas605(Mad)
Palaniswamy, J. 1. This petition is filed under Section 101 of the Companies Act, 1956, praying for the confirmation of the reduction of the share capital of the petitioner-company, Self Help Private Industrial Estate Private Ltd. One of the main objects of the company is to acquire lands either by purchase or gift or take them on lease and develop them and divide them into plots and deal with them. The capital of the company is Rs. 4,99,000. It is alleged in the petition that the shareholders felt that in future owning and managing private industrial estate is not an economical proposition and therefore a resolution was passsd on 20th March, 1970, to reduce the authorised share capital of the company from Rs. 4,99,000 divided into 4,990 equity shares of Rs. 100 each to Rs. 4,990 divided into 4,990 equity shares of Re. 1 each. It is to confirm this reduction that this petition has been filed. The Registrar of Companies has taken objection to confirmation on the ground that, as required...
J. Pattammal Vs. the Collector of Madras and anr.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-05-1971
Reported in: AIR1972Mad158
1. The question referred to us by Sadasivam and Mudaliyar, JJ. is:--"Whether an appellant should pay court-fee on the interest payable to him under section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, and if so, on what basis?"The appellant whose land had been acquired compulsorily under the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act was, on a reference under Section 18 of the Act, granted by the City Civil Court a sum of Rs. 1570-62 as enhanced compensation with interest at 4 per cent, from 20-7-1959, the date on which the State had taken possession of the land. Sadasivam and Srinivasan, JJ. allowed the claimant's appeal and granted a further sum of Rs. 1570-62 together with solatium at the prescribed percentage. Though in the memorandum of appeal the appellant had undertaken to pay court-fee on the interest over the further enhanced compensation that might be allowed, actually the learned Judges said nothing about interest while disposing of the appeal. The appellant, therefore, sought by a petition ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›