Chennai Court September 1970 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mohammed HussaIn Vs. A.K.M. Pitchai
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-03-1970
Reported in: (1970)2MLJ663
G. Ramanujam, J.1. The above two revisions arise out of two applications filed by the respondent herein, one E.A. No. 1126 of 1968 for redelivery of possession of a house from which the respondent was evicted by the Court and the other E.A. No. 197 of 1969 for recovery of damages or mesne profits. The circumstances under which the above two revisions came to be filed by the petitioner are these:2. The respondent was a tenant under the petitioner herein. The petitioner filed an eviction petition in H.R.C. No. 1894 of 1967 on the ground of wilful default by the respondent in payment of the rents. There was an ex parte order of eviction on 7th August, 1967. The respondent filed LA. No. 880 of 1967 for setting aside (he said ex parte order. The Rent Controller passed a conditional order setting aside the ex parte order of eviction but : as the conditions were not complied with, the said application was dismissed on 9th November, 1967. Thereafter, in execution of the ex parte order of evict...
Kodambakkan Panchayat Represented by Its President Vs. the Inspector o ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-02-1970
Reported in: (1971)1MLJ184
ORDERT. Ramaprasada Rao, J.1. The sitting president of the Kcdambakkam panchayat is the petitioner. As per the last census, the population of the village was reckoned at 1001 amongst whom about 900 persons were qualified to vote. As per the rules, the number of members to be elected to the panchayat are 8, besides one woman member to be co-opted. As matters stand, the panchayat is divided into two blocks and there are 4 members representing each block. Within the boundaries of the revenue village included in the panchayat, there is an eri pomomboke or P.W.D. tank of an area of 128.78 acres, and it is common ground that this is within the limits of the Kodambakkam. village panchayat. Portions of this eri poromboke have been alienated to the Madras Corporation and the Tamil Nadu State Housing Board; but it is claimed that the alienation of the said land to such-public bodies does not constitute exclusion of the area from the jurisdiction of the panchayat. Though it does not vest in the p...
Munia Goundar Vs. Palani Goundar and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-01-1970
Reported in: (1971)1MLJ181
ORDERK.S. Palaniswamy, J.1. The Office of the headman of Ariyapadi village, Arni taluk, North Arcot District, fell vacant consequent on the death of the Isum headman of that village. The Revenue Divisional Officer of Cbeyyar invited applications and by order dated 3rd August, 1966, appointed Palani Goundar, the first respondent herein, as the headman of the said village temporarily, but on long term basis. Against that order two of the unsuccessful candidates, Munia Goundar, the petitioner herein, and one Ramaswamy Goundar, preferred appeals to the District Revenue Officer, North Arcot. By order dated 20th September, 1966, the District Revenue Officer set aside the order of the Revenue Divisional Officer and appointed the petitioner herein, as the headman of the said village. Against this order, Palani Goundar, the first respondent, preferred an appeal to the Board of Revenue. After hearing the Counsel for the petitioner herein, and perusing the records,the Board of Revenue came to the...
Chiarman of Manging Committee of the Smt. Dev Kunwar Nanalal Bhatt Vai ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-01-1970
Reported in: (1971)1MLJ76
ORDERG. Ramanujam, J.1. The respondent herein was employed by the petitioner as a Physical Directress in the suit College at the first instance for the academic year 1968-69. The appointment was renewed for a further period of one year ending with the academic year 1969-70. The petitioner issued an order dated 24th February, 1970, terminating her services with effect from 31st March, 1970, while the academic year came to a close on 4th April, 1970. Aggrieved against this order terminating her services, the respondent filed. O.S. No. 332 of 1970 on the file of the Court of the District Munsif, Poonamallee, for a declaration that the termination of her services was wrongful and for an injunction restraining the petitioner from giving effect to the order of termination. In that suit she filed an application, I.A. No. 331 of 1970, for an interim injunction restraining the petitioner from giving effect to the said order terminating her services and got an ex parte order of injunction on 1st...