Chennai Court June 1968 Judgments
Vellinayagi Vs. T. Subramaniam
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-18-1968
Reported in: AIR1969Mad479; (1969)1MLJ334
ORDERAlagiriswami, J.1. This is a petition to revise the order of the learned Subordinate Judge of Thanjavur in I.A. 11 of 1966 in O. P. 6 of 1966. O. P. 6 of 1966 was filed by the present respondent for annulment of his marriage with the petitioner. Along with the original petition No. 6 of J966, he filed the interlocutory application out of which this civil revision petition arises for condonation of the delay of one year, six months and twenty four days in presenting the petition. The parties were married on 18-6-1963. The petitioner gave birth to a child on 26-2-1964. The petitioner intimated to the Municipal authorities on 8-3-1964 disowning the said child. Thereafter he filed the petition for annulment of marriage on 5-1-1966. On behalf of the petitioner (herein) objection was taken that the Court had no jurisdiction to condone the delay in the presentation of the petition for annulment of the marriage and that the conditions laid down in Section 12(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act w...
Tag this Judgment!Antiseptic Employees Unit, represented by the Tamilnad Press Workers' ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-17-1968
Reported in: AIR1970Mad145
ORDERKailasam, J.1. This petition is filed by the Antiseptic Employees Unit, represented by the Tamilnad Press Workers Union, for the issue of a writ of Mandamus, directing the State Government to refer the dispute relating to all the demands contained in the Order of the State Government in G. O. Rt. 1306 dated 7-7-1966 for adjudication under Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, The second respondent is a Journal represented by its partner one Sri Vyasa Rao. The journal is English medical monthly with a circulation of 14,000 copies under the name and style of 'Antiseptic'. Besides this, a monthly medical journal known as 'Health' is also printed and published by the second respondent with a circulation of 3400 copies monthly. There are 13 clerical staff and about 22 workers employed by the Management. A settlement was arrived at between the management of the Press on the one hand and the clerical staff and the workmen on the other on 27-3-1962, relating to service conditions of ...
Tag this Judgment!B.S. Ramappa and anr. Vs. V.B. Monappa and anr.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-17-1968
Reported in: AIR1970Mad156
Venkataraman, J.1. This is an appeal against the order of the learned Assistant Registrar of Trade Marks, dated 20th March, 1965 registering a trade mark in the name of B. Monappa, the first respondent in the appeal. To understand the points in controversy, it is necessary to have an idea of the background and the events which led to the filing of the Application No. 216880 of Monappa. Monappa and the first appellant B. S. Ramappa are the sons of the late B. Ramappa, Monappa being the elder son. The fate Ramappa started the business of manufacturing tiles in or about 1921 in Mangalore and invented the trade mark known as the Taj Double Bavta Mark. Bavta means a flag and the mark itself will be described a little later. He was therefore the founder of the trade mark. He registered it in or about 1936 in the Chamber of Commerce, Madras; but at that time there was no statute for registration in this country, and the first statute was passed in the country only in 1940. He was manufacturin...
Tag this Judgment!B.S. Ramappa and anr. Vs. B. Monappa, Trading as Indian National Tile ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-17-1968
Reported in: (1969)2MLJ38
K.S. Venkataraman, J.1. This is an appeal against the order of the learned Assistant Registrar of Trade Marks, dated 20th March, 1965 registering a trade mark in the name of B. Monappa, the first respondent in the appeal. To understand the points in controversy, it is necessary to have an idea of the background and the events which led to the filing of the Application No. 216880 of Monappa. Monappa and the first appellant B. S. Ramappa are the sons of the late B. Ramappa, Monappa being the elder son. The late Ramappa started the business of manufacturing tiles in or about 1921 in Mangalore and invented the trade mark known as the Taj Double Bavta Mark. Bavta means a flag and the mark itself will be described a little later. He was therefore the founder of the trade mark. He registered it in or about 1936 in the Chamber of Commerce, Madras; but at that time there was no statute for registration in this country, and the first statute was passed in the country only in 1940. He was manufac...
Tag this Judgment!Antiseptic Employees Unit, Represented by the Tamilnad Press Workers U ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-17-1968
Reported in: (1969)2MLJ198
ORDERP.S. Kailasam, J.1. This petition is filed by the Antiseptic Employees Unit represented by the Tamilnad Press Workers Union, for the issue of a writ of mandamus, directing the State Government to refer the dispute relating to all the demands contained in the order of the State Government in G.O.Rt. No. 1306, dated 7th July, 5966 for adjudication under Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act. The second respondent is a journal represented by its partner one Sri Vyasa Rao. The journal is an English medical monthly with a circulation of 14,000 copies under the name and style of ' Antiseptic '. Besides this, a monthly medical journal known as ' Health ' is also printed and published by the second respondent with a circulation of 3,400 copies monthly. There are 13 clerical staff and about 22 workers employed by the management. A settlement was arrived at between the management of the Press on the one hand and the clerical staff and the workmen on the other on 27th March, 1962 relatin...
Tag this Judgment!Mrs. Rahmath Bi Vs. Angappa Raja (Petitioning Creditor) and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-17-1968
Reported in: (1969)2MLJ518
K.S. Venkataraman, J.1. This is an application filed by one Mrs. Rahmath Bi to implead her as the second petitioning creditor in I.P. No. 31 of 1967. The facts giving rise to this application are these:I.P. No. 31 of 1967 has been filed by one Angappa Raja to adjudge one R. A. Khaleel, the first respondent therein as insolvent. R. A. Khaleel had executed a promissory note for Rs. 20,000 on 16th July, 1963 in favour of Mrs. Rahmath Bi, who happens to be his sister. That promissory note was endorsed on 10th April, 1967 in favour of Angappa Raja. The endorsement was only for purposes of collection, the actual endorsement being ' I do hereby endorse this promissory note in favour of Sri D. Angappa Raja of No. 28, Muniappa Naicken St., Madras-11,. for the purpose of collection.2. On 9th March, 1967 the debtor, Khaleel, had sold his lands, 12 acree 89 cents, in Arkonam taluk to Shasukraj for Rs. 43,000. The deed was also registered on the same day. Angappa Raja filed I.P. No. 31 of 1967 on 2...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›