Chennai Court May 1964 Judgments
Natesan Transports (P) Ltd. Jayankondachalapuram Vs. Tanjore Motor Tra ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-26-1964
Reported in: AIR1965Mad478
Natesan, J. (1) This is an application for leave to file an appeal in the Supreme Court against the decision of this court in W. A. No. 74 of 1964. The petitioner contends that the judgment of this court even though the appeal was dismissed is one of variance. The petitioner was one of the applicants before the Regional Transport Authority, South Arcot, for a stage carriage permit on the route between Neiveli and Kumbakonam. The first respondent herein became the successful applicant, and the petitioner preferred an appeal and directed the grant of the permit to the petitioner. The original grantee, the first respondent herein, there upon filed the petition out of which the present application arises for quashing the order of the Tribunal under Art. 226 of the Constitution. Following the decision of the Supreme Court in C. A. 19 of 1964, where it was held that G. O. No. 1298 issued by the Government of Madras in 1956 in exercise of the powers conferred by S. 43-A of the Motor Vehicles ...
Tag this Judgment!P. Orr and Sons Private Ltd., Madras Vs. Collector of Customs, Madras
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-01-1964
Reported in: AIR1965Mad312
S. Ramachandra Iyer, C.J.(1) The short point for consideration in this appeal against the judgment of Veeraswami J. is whether object glasses and lenses used in the manufacture of Theodolites will be liable to a countervailing duty on import under item 60(9), (4) of the Tariff Act, 1934, as comprised under the heading of 'glassware'. The appellant company amongst its other lines of business, manufactures scientific and survey instruments. They imported by air on 23-11-1961, during the licensing period April to September 1961, under an actual user's license issued under Item 92 G-2 of the Import Trade Control Policy book, object glasses and lenses for being used as component parts of Theodolites to be manufactured by them. For the purpose of import duty these articles fall under Item 77 of the Indian Tariff Act, 1934, which runs 'Instruments, apparatus and appliances other than electrical, all sorts not otherwise specified-40 per cent ad valorem if imported from the United Kingdom.'Acco...
Tag this Judgment!T. Chengalvaraya Chettiar Vs. A. Nataraja Chettiar
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-01-1964
Reported in: AIR1966Mad19
(1) This civil revision petition arises out of small cause suit No. 4369 of 1959 filed by the respondent herein for recovery of arrears of rents in respect of No. 7 Sivan Koil South Tank St, Villivakkam, for the months of February 1958 to the end of June 1959 amounting to Rs.340. The defence to the suit was that he surrendered the premises in the end of December 1957 and as such the plaintiff was not entitled to the rent.(2) The facts necessary for the disposal of this revision are as follows. The defendant admitted that he took the above said premises for rent and continued till 14-12-1957, when he vacated it delivering the key of the premises to the plaintiff through his counsel which the plaintiff refused to receive. Therefore, according to the defendant, he was not liable to pay the rent. The first court found that there was surrender of the suit premises on 14-12-1957, and therefore the defendant was not liable to pay rent. On appeal it has been reversed.(3) The only question tha...
Tag this Judgment!Cumbum Roadways (P) Ltd., Madurai Vs. Somu Transports (P.) Ltd., Madur ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-01-1964
Reported in: AIR1965Mad79
(1) This writ appeal is preferred against the order of Veeraswami J. allowing the writ petition filed by the first respondent herein, Somu Transport (P) Ltd. Madurai. The route between Madurai and Sholavandan via Samayanallur was notified for grant of a stage carriage permit. There were 32 applicants, and the Regional Transport authority granted the permit to the 24th applicant before it, the Somu Transports (P.) Ltd. the first respondent herein. The appellant herein, the Cumbum Roadways (P.) was the 30th applicant. Ten of the applicants preferred appeals to the State Transport Appellate Tribunal. In the memorandum of grounds to the appeal preferred by the appellant No. 9 before the State Transport Appellate Tribunal, S. Mohammed Ismail, it was contended that one of the share-holders of Somu Transports (P.) Ltd. Sri K. Somasundaram, was having 100 equity shares in the respondent company, that he was a director of the respondent company at the time of the incorporation and that he resig...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- Next ›