Chennai Court February 1955 Judgments
In Re: Thangavelu Mudali
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-08-1955
Reported in: 1956CriLJ245
ORDERBalakrishna Ayyar, J. 1. Thangavelu Mudali, the petitioner before me, was the employee of one Padhmanabhan. It was part of his duties to sell cloth belonging to his employer in various places and collect the money due from the customers. On receipt of a complaint from one of his customers, Padhmanabhan looked into the account maintained by the petitioner and then noticed facts, which led him to conclude that the petitioner had falsified the accounts and appropriated different sums of money, He, therefore, laid a complaint before the police on 20-2-1953.The police investigated the case and laid two charge-sheets, one before the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Tirupattur, for falsification of accounts and the other before the Sub-Magistrate, Tirupattur, for breach of trust under Section 408, I.P.C. The charge sheet for falsification of accounts was registered by the Magistrate as C. C No. 80 of 1953. The learned Magistrate framed charges against the accused under Section 477-A, I.P.C. bu...
Tag this Judgment!Ramalinga Padayachi Vs. Srinivasalu Naidu Alias Boorasami Naidu and or ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-04-1955
Reported in: AIR1955Mad657; (1955)2MLJ173
1. These are two appeals under the Letters Patent against the judgment of Viswanatha Sastri J. in A.S. No. 602 of 1946, which was ati appeal preferred against the decree and judgment of the Court of the Subordinate Judge of Cuddalore in O. S. No. 36 of 1944. That was a suit for possession of properties which had belonged to the first respondent and which had been alicoated by the first defendant acting as his guardian when the first respondent was a minor. The first respondent alleged that the alienations were not binding on him. The impugned alienations were four sales of which we are concerned in these appeals with two only, viz, those covered by sale deeds, Exs. D-33 and D-1 dated 18-9-1936 and 20-11-1938 respectively. The properties in suit belonged to the joint family consisting of the plaintiff, first respondent and his father, one Sundararajulu Naidu who died on 29-12-1928.Sundararajulu Naidu is alleged to have left a will dated 29-12-1928 appointing the first defendant, a relat...
Tag this Judgment!Valliammal and ors. Vs. Palani Goundan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-03-1955
Reported in: AIR1955Mad533; (1955)2MLJ211
1. This second appeal involves a question of res judicata. It arises out of a suit for possession brought by the respondent claiming to be the reversioner to one Subbanna Goundan alias Subbaraya Goundan, who died in 1916. Subbaraya Goundan left behind him his widow, Pavayi Ammal, a son Nachimuthu, and a daughter, Valliammal, the first defendant. The 2nd defendant is the son, and the third defendant, the husband of . the first defendant. Nachimuthu died unmarried on 6-12-1928, and on his death his mother Pavayi Ammal succeeded to the properties left by Subbanna Goundan. Pavayi died in 1947. The suit was brought in July 1948. There could bo no doubt whatever that in accordance with the provisions of Act II of 1929, the 1st defendant would be entitled to succeed to the exclusion of. the plaintiff. The plaintiff, however, claimed that he would be entitled to succeed because of the decision in a prior suit, O. S. No. 933 of 1932 brought by him in the following circumstances:On 22-9-1932 Pav...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›