Chennai Court July 1914 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

AI Brief & Ask
Semantic AI Search
Devil's Bench

Try free for 7 days Semantic AI Search

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Jul 13 1914

Unde Rajah Raja Sri Raja Velugoti Srirajagopala Krishna Yachendra Baha ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jul-13-1914

Reported in: AIR1915Mad545; 25Ind.Cas.590a

Sadasiva Aiyar, J.1. Whether the second crop alone was raised with the help of the tenant's improvement (the well excavated by him at his own expense) or both the first and the second crops were due to the help of the irrigation from that well, I think that the increase of production' in the holding by the quantity of grain raised in the second crop is a consequence of the improvement.' If so, the tenant is, under Section 13, Clause (3), not liable to pay 'a higher rate of rent,' that is a rate higher than he would have had to pay if the increase of production had not taken place. The rate of rent is, in my opinion, higher for the Fasli in question whether the increase which makes it higher is brought about by the condition that the rent for the Fasli shall be larger than that first provided for in the muchilika in case two crops are raised instead of one, or whether such increase is brought about by the condition that a separate or independent amount shall be paid as additional rent f...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 13 1914

K. Vilvanatha Mudaliar Vs. Mannar Naidu