Chennai Court December 1905 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Arunachellam Chetty Vs. Ramanadhan Chetty (Minor) by His Next Friend A ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-05-1905
Reported in: (1906)ILR29Mad309
1. The appellant asked for an order under Section 258, Civil Procedure Code, certifying that the claim of the attaching-creditor had been adjusted by a compromise. The attaching-creditor is a minor and when the application under Section 258 of the Civil Procedure Code was made no application had been made by his guardian for leave to enter into the compromise relied upon as the adjustment sis required by Section 462 of the Civil Procedure Code. In this state of things we think the Court below was right in declining to make an order under Section 258 of the Civil Procedure Code. This appeal is dismissed with cost....
Rengasawmy Naicken Vs. Gangammal and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-04-1905
Reported in: (1906)ILR29Mad300
1. We think that exhibit III evidences an absolute grant to the widow alone in satisfaction of all her claims There is no grant to her daughter, who is referred to merely as her heir in the ordinary course, and to show that on the death of the widow the grantor and his branch of the family shall have no claim to the land. The widow having survived her daughter, the latter never acquired any interest in the land nor did her husband, the appellant. In this view the appeal fails and is dismissed with costs....
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›