Chennai Court September 1894 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Agra Bank Limited Vs. Leishman
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-07-1894
Reported in: (1895)ILR18Mad41
1. This is a petition by the Agra Bank to revise an order of the First-class Magistrate of Ootacamund under Sections 145 and 146, Criminal Procedure Code, attaching two plots of land as to which he was not able to decide whether the Bank or the counter-petitioner, Mr. Leishman, was in possession. The admitted facts are that in 1885 the Bank sold a portion of the Bella Vista property in Ootacamund to the Murree Brewery Company. Shortly afterwards, in 1885 or 1886, some sort of survey was made, and the Brewery Company put down demarcation stones to show the limits of their purchase and planted gum trees to mark the boundary. Matters so continued till Mr. Leishman agreed to purchase the Brewery Company, at the end of 1892. He was put in possession of the machinery and buildings, but in 1893, after survey of the boundaries by a Mr. De Lima, he became of opinion that the boundaries as defined by the stones put down by the Brewery Company were not in accordance with their title-deed, and tha...
Sri Raja Papamma Row Bahadur Zemindar Garu of Nidadavolu Vs. Cherukuva ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-04-1894
Reported in: (1895)5MLJ233
1. The plaintiff is a First Grade Pleader practising at Ellore in the Godavari District. The plaint sets forth that the plaintiff was engaged on the 22nd of January 1888 to conduct the defendant's affairs as pleader and agent. He was to look after the defendant's interests in Madras in relation to matters before Government and the Board of Revenue and also to obtain Probate of the will of the late adopted son of the defendant in the District Courts of Godaveri and Kistna. For these services plaintiff alleges that he was to be paid a salary of Rs. 1,000 per mensem and his expenses; and he also alleges that defendant promised him a present of Rupees 1,116 as a mark of gratitude, of which she has only paid him Rupees 5,000. The plaintiff alleges that his services were dispensed with on the 22nd of April 1889? and he claims arrears of fees for four months and interest thereon, deducting Rupees 27-10-0 as balance in hand of money advanced to him for expenses.2. The defendant's answer was th...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›