Chennai Court September 1888 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Allareddi Subbamma Vs. Nallapareddi Audilakshmamma and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-13-1888
Reported in: (1912)22MLJ260
1. The plaintiff's claim is based upon an allegation that her husband's family, the Allareddi family, has for a long time been joint with the family of the 1st defendant's husband, the Nallappareddi family having equal rights in all their property.2. The evidence shows that there have been no less than three intermarriages between the Allareddi and Nallapareddi families. It is admitted that whatever landed property there is in suit stands in the name of the Nallapareddi family, and the appellant's pleader is not able to show that any property stands in the name of the Allareddi family. When Venkatramireddi, No. 8. in the pedigree, died in 1875, the male members of the Nallapareddi family became extinct, and it was not unnatural that plaintiff's son Subbareddi, who was to be married to the only daughter of Venkataramireddi should, by arrangement, be allowed to take out the heirship certificate. In the petition, he is described as the undivided nephew and son of Venkataramaireddi's senio...
Singara Chariar and anr. Vs. Krishnasawmy Thatha Chariar and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-11-1888
Reported in: (1896)6MLJ329
Kernan, J.1. The Lower Appellate Court agreeing with the Munsif, decided that the plaintiffs' suit is resjudicata. This is an appeal against that decision.2. In suit 120 of 1852 in the Principal Sadr Amin's Court, the plaintiff, the owners of Archaka and Paricharaka Mirasies in the temple of Sri Varadarajaswas in Conjeeveram, were declared entitled to Linue to perform puja according to, mamool and enjoy withuot of the defendants to that suit including the defendants here the drchaka and Paricharaka Mirasies, in respect of the Manavala ings and to have the purification ceremony performed.3. The plaintiffs-finding that the Alwar, copper idol had been abstracted from the temple, and having been informed that was found in a tan, within the Jurisdiction of the Additional Court of Conjeeveram, the idol was at the instance of the palintiffs tiffs, taken possession of by the Court Thereupon the plaintiffs filed in the Court at Conjeevram Suit No 858 of 1861 praying a decree permitting plaintif...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›