Chennai Orders Court June 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The Managing Director Vs Salomi
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-22-2026
C.M.P.No.14157 of 2026 in C.M.A.SR.No.76670 of 2026A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.This petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 66 days in filing the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.2. The reasons adduced in theaffidavit filed in support of this petition being satisfactory, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is ordered and consequently, the delay of 66 days in filing the appeal is condoned. 22.06.2026 ham Note: Registry is directed to number the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, if it is, otherwise, in order and list the same for admission in due course. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-1 Vs Cholamandalam Investment ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-22-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 22-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN in TCA SR No.4734 of 2026 The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-1 Chennai-600 034 ..Appellant(s) Vs Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Limited Chola Crest C54 and C55, Super B-4, Thiru Vi Ka Industrial Estate, Guindy, Guindy Industrial Estate SO, Chennai-600 032. ..Respondent(s) Petition filed under Section 151 CPC to dispense with the production of For Appellant(s): Mr. T.Ravi Kumar Senior Standing Counsel for Income Tax Department Page1 of 2ORDER(Order of the Court was made by The Chief Justice) Heard the learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the appellant.2. The petition has been filed seeking to dispense with the production of3. The reasons adduced being satisfactory, the petition stands ordered.Production of certified copy of the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in ITA No....
Janarthanan Vs The State Represented by
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-22-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 22-06-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Janarthanan Petitioner(s) Vs The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Economics Offences Wing, Chennai. Ref.Cr.No.16/2022 dated 04.08.2022 Respondent(s) PRAYER To enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of their arrest in C.C.No.7 of 2022 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.Raja For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Yogaraja Sekar Govt.Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThe learned counsel for the petitioner made an endorsement seeking permission to withdraw the Criminal Original Petition.2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. dpa 22-06-2026C.KUMARAPPAN,J.dpa To1. The learned Special Court for TNPID Act, Chennai.2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Economics Offences Wing, Chennai.3. The Superintendent, Central Prison, Puzhal-II.4. The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Chennai....
Union of India Vs M Palani (died)
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-22-2026
W.M.P.No.25319 of 2026 in W.P.No.23359 of 2026 S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J., and N.SENTHILKUMAR, J., This Writ Miscellaneous Petition filed to dispense with the production of the original copy of the order dated 30.11.2023 in O.A.No.751 of 2017 on the file of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Chennai Bench, is ordered. [S.M.S, J.,] [N.S, J.,] 22.06.2026 (2/3) mk https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Shyamala vs the Senior Manager
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-22-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 22.06.2026CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN and W.M.P.No.19299 of 2023 Shyamala W/o.Late Parthiban, Muthukalipatti Village, Rasipuram Post, Rasipuram Taluk, Namakkal District Petitioner Vs 1.The Senior Manager 2.The Manager TATA AIG General Insurance Company Limited, 2nd Floor, Samsung Tower, Egmore, Chennai-600 008. Respondent(s) PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus forbearing the 1st respondent from initiating loan recovery proceedings in pursuance to the impugned possession notice dated 24.05.2023 issued by the 1st respondent till the disposal of C.C.No.14/2023 pending on the file of the District Consumer Redressal Commission, Namakkal. For Petitioner: No Appearance For Respondent(s):Mr.Tarang K.Sancheti for Mr.T.Sai Krishnan for R1 R2 - No AppearanceORDER(Order of the Court was made b...
Murugesan Vs The State rep by The Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-22-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 22-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN1. Murugesan2. Murugesan3. Poovarasan4. Karthikeyan5. Ishwarya6. Sathya ..Petitioners Vs The State rep. by The Inspector of Police, (Crime No.77 of 2026) ..RespondentPRAYER: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to relax the condition imposed in paragraph No.5(b) in Crl.O.P.No.11948 of 2026 dated 07.05.2026 passed by this Court. For Petitioners: Mr.V.Vadivalagia Nambi For Respondent: Ms.R.S.Indira Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThis Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking to relax the condition imposed in paragraph No.5(b) in Crl.O.P.No.11948 of 2026 dated 07.05.2026 passed by this Court. Page1 of 2C.KUMARAPPAN, J.2. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent Police submitted that the petitioners have been regularly complying with the conditions imposed by this Court.3. Consi...
Indira Priya Vs S.Umashankar
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-22-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 22-06-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI IN CRP SR NO. 87009 OF 2026 Indira Priya Appellant(s) Vs1. S.Umashankar 2.B.JagadeeswaranRespondent(s) PRAYER To dispense with of the order passed by the H XV Judge, Small Causes Court, Chennai in MP No. 6 of 2026 dated 15-04-2026 in CA No. 4330/2026 and pass such further or other orders as this Court. For Appellant(s): MR.N.Gyanchand Jain For Respondent(s):ORDEROrdered as prayed for. pbl Index:Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderInternet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No T.V.THAMILSELVI J. pbl IN CRP SR NO. 87009 OF 2026...
Mr.Vivekanand Sankar, S/o. J.Sankar, Vs Priyadarshini Rajasekaran
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-22-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 22-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE in Vivekanand Sankar ..Applicant(s) Vs1. Priyadarshini Rajasekaran2. G.Rajasekaran,3. Saroja Rajasekaran,..Respondent(s) PRAYER in A.No.3434 of 2021: This Application is filed praying to direct the 2nd and 3rd Respondents to handover Interim custody of the minor children Vinaya Sankar (Female/born on 08.06.2012) and Iniya Sankar (Female/born on 11.10.2016) to the Applicant/Petitioner for a period of one week i.e from 25th September 2021 till 2nd October 2021 for the applicant to exercise his visitation right over the minor Children Vinaya and Iniya pending disposal of the main petition.Page1 of 4 PRAYER in A.No.3435 of 2021: This Application is filed praying to permit the Applicant to speak to the minor children Vinaya Sankar (Female/born on 08.06.2012) Iniya Sankar (Female/born on 11.10.2016) through video call every day for one hour pending disposal of the main petition. PRAYER ...
S.Rajendran Vs Shilpa Stainless Private Limited
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-22-2026
C.M.P.No.13776 of 2026 in C.M.A.SR.No.87526 of 2026A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.This petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 179 days in filing the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.2. Mr.J.Chandran, learned counsel who takes notice on behalf of the second respondent/Insurance Company, stated that he has no objection to this petition being allowed.3. The reasons adduced in theaffidavit filed in support of this petition being satisfactory, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is ordered and consequently, the delay of 179 days in filing the appeal is condoned, subject to the condition that the claimant/petitioner will not be entitled to any interest for the delay period i.e., for 179 days, in the appeal.22.06.2026 ham Note: Registry is directed to number the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, if it is, otherwise, in order and list the same for admission on 24.06.2026. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Prabhu Vs Deepan Raj
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-22-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 22-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN IN Prabhu ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. Deepan Raj2. State rep.by its, The Inspector of Police, B-2 Esplanade (Crime) Police Station,..Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): Mr.S.Senthilvel For Respondent(s): Mr.A.Santhana Sinakarthan For R1 Mr.N.Palanivel Government Advocate (Criminal side) for R2ORDERThis petition is ordered. (2/3) ep To 1.The Inspector of Police B2 Esplanade Police Station, 2.The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras. Page1 of 2C.KUMARAPPAN, J.EP IN Page2 of 2...
- ‹ Prev
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- Next ›
- Last »