Chennai Orders Court June 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Parvathy Vs D.Jakkammal
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-01-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 01.06.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN and C.M.P(MD)No.6005 of 2026 Parvathy ... Petitioner Vs 1.D.Jakkammal 2.Pandi @ Appaiyasamy 3.Perumalsamy 4.Manikandan ... Respondents PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code, to set aside the order dated 30.03.2026 passed in E.A.No.9 of 2026 in E.A.No.5 of 2025 in E.P.No.13 of 2022 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Theni and allow the civil revision petition.For Petitioner : Mr.M.SaravananORDERThe learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this revision and he has also made an endorsement to that effect in the case bundle.2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to pursue remedy in the stay petition in I.A.No.1 of2026 in C.M.A.No.2 of 2026 on the file of the Sub...
Tvl.R.CHANDRASEKAR Vs The Assistant Commissioner (Inspection) (ST) (IU ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-01-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 01-06-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY1. Tvl.R.CHANDRASEKAR GSTIN 33AFTPC2530D1ZY Door No.1/5 Muntupanai Theethathapuram Udangudi Thoothukudi - 628 203 Petitioner(s) Vs Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): Sudalai Muthu N P.Arunagiri S.Anandha Rajagopal For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Parthiban Government AdvocatePrayer: To extend the time stipulated in the order dated 06.01.2026 made in W.P(MD) No.102 of 2026 for payment of the conditional amount of Rs.10,00,000/- by a further period of three months or such further time as this Honble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and thus render justice.ORDERConsidering the nature of averments made detailing the circumstances under which the petitioner could not make the payment and considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner that if appropriate time is granted, the petitioner will make the payment without fail, six weeks...
National Insurance Company Ltd., Vs Prema
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-01-2026
C.M.P.(MD)No.5702 of 2026 in C.M.A.(MD)No.1154 of 2022K.MURALI SHANKAR, J.The above petition is filed to ordersubstituted service of notice to the fourth respondent by way of publishing the notice in any one of the daily Newspaper in C.M.A. (MD)No.1154 of 2022.2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the learned counsel appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 and the learned counsel appearing for the fifth respondent. Records perused.3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the fourth respondent had remained ex-parte before the Tribunal.4. Being satisfied with the reasonsstated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, this petition is ordered and the petitioner is permitted to effect substituted service for the fourth respondent, by paper publication in Tamil Daily viz., Malai Murasu, having wide circulation in Puducherry District, indicating the next date of hearing as 06.07.2026. The publication shall be effected on or before 25....
C.Selva Joyson Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Awps- ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-01-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 01.06.2026CORAM:THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR and Crl.M.P.(MD).No.9703 of 20261. C.SELVA JOYSON2. K.CHINNAPPAN3. JOSEPIN MERY @ MARRY4. SEBASTIAN SATHEESH @ SATHISH ...Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 to 4 Vs1. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By The Inspector Of Police,2. S.Sara Sybil ...RespondentsPRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS Act, 2023, to call for the records in FIR in Crime No.03/2026 on the file of the All Women Police Station, Pudukottai District and to quash the same against the petitioners as devoid of merits and pass such further or other orders. For Petitioners : M/s.S.Atham Ali For Respondents : Mr.P.Samuel Gunasingh Government Advocate(crl.side) For R1ORDERThe present petition has been filed by the Accused Nos.1 to 4 in Crime No.03 of 2026 on the file of the first respondent police seeking to quash the FIR in Crime No.03 of 2026, wherein, the petitioners are alleged to have committed of...
Balasubramanian Vs The Claims Manager
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-01-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 01-06-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR CMP(MD) No.5700 of 2026 in CMP(MD) No.17910 of 2025 in CMA(MD) No.1307 of 2025 Balasubramanian Petitioner/1st Respondent/ 1st Respondent Vs 1.The Claims Manager, M/s.Bajaj Alliance General Insurance Company Limited, Rajapalayam Center, 21#A, Nethaji Nagar, Nansundapuram Main Road, Opposite of Indian Oil Petrol Bulk, Ramanathapuram, Coimbatore-641045. 1st Respondent/Petitioner/ Appellant 2.The Director, Raju Spinning Mills Private Limited, 110-B, Cotton Market, Rajapalayam-626117, Virudhunagar District. 2nd Respondent/2nd Respondent/ 2nd Respondent (2nd respondent remained exparte in lower Court, hence notice may be dispensed with) Prayer in CMP(MD)No.5700 of 2026 : This Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 151 of Civil Procedure Code praying to permit the petitioner to withdraw 50% of the amount deposited by the first respondent herein which is lying to the credit ...
MUTHUKUMAR Vs The State Of Tamilnadu Rep By The Inspector Of Police, O ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-01-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL Muthukumar ...Petitioner/Accused-6 Vs State of Tamil Nadu rep. by The Inspector of Police, (Crime No. 26 of 2026 ) ...Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : M/s.A.Banumathy Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.G.Ganesh Kumar Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Cr.No. 26 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police.ORDER : The Court made the following order :-Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this court to withdraw this petition and he has made an endorsement to that effect.2. Recording the same, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (PDBJ) 01.06.2026 apd TO 1.The Inspector of Police,2. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. P.DHANABAL,J apdORDERIN CRL OP(MD) No....
Vinoth @ Vinothkumar Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-01-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 01.06.2026CORAM:THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR and Crl.M.P.(MD).No.9277 of 20261. Vinoth @ Vinothkumar2. Rabhinraja @ Rabinraja ...Petitioner/Accused Nos.1 & 10 Vs1. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector of Police,2. Pandiyarajan ...RespondentsPRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS Act, 2023, To call for the records pertaining to the impugned FIR in Crime No. the same as illegal insofar as the petitioners are concerned and pass such furtherorder or other orders.For Petitioners : M/s.M.Pirithivirajan For Respondents : Mr.P.Samuel Gunasingh Government Advocate(crl.side) For R1ORDERThe present petition has been filed by the Accused Nos.1 and 10 in Crime No.6 of 2024 on the file of the first respondent police seeking to quash the FIR in Crime No.6 of 2024, wherein, the petitioners are alleged to have committed offences punishable under Sections 341 & 143 of IPC.2. According to the learned G...
U.Ranjitha, Vs Senthamarai,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-01-2026
1 CONT.P.(MD)NO.1567 OF 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 01.06.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN U.Ranjitha ... Petitioner / Petitioner Vs. Mrs.Senthamarai, Tahsildar, Madurai District. ... Contemnor / Respondent Prayer: Contempt petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the contemnor for the deliberate and willful disobedience of the order dated 12.12.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.(MD)No.29218 of 2023. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Gowtham For Respondent : Mr.M.P.Senthil, Government counsel. 2 CONT.P.(MD)NO.1567 OF 2026ORDERIt is reported that the order passed by this Court has since been complied with. In view of the same, this contempt petition is closed. NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No PMU To: The Tahsildar, Madurai District. 3 CONT.P.(MD)NO.1567 OF 2026G.R.SWAMINATHAN,J.PMU...
C.Kannayan Vs The State of Tamilnadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-01-2026
in BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 01.06.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI in C.Kannayan ... Petitioner Vs. Crime No.7/2026.3. Prasana Venkatesan ... RespondentsPRAYER :- Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS 2023, to dispense with the production of the certified copy of FIR No.07/2026 dated 27.03.2026 on the file of the Directorate of Vigilance and Anti Corruption, Trichy. in For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sivakumar For R1 and R2 : Mr.A.Robinson, Additional Public ProsecutorORDERThis petition filed to dispense with the production of the certified copy of FIR in Crime No.7 of 2026, is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to move the criminal original petition along with the certified copy of the FIR. ogy To inB.PUGALENDHI, J.ogy in...
N.R.Neelakandan Vs S.K.Varadhan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-01-2026
1 CONT.P.(MD)NO.1449 OF 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 01.06.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN N.R.Neelakandan ... Petitioner / Petitioner Vs. Mr.S.K.Varadhan, Tahsildar, Ramanathapuram District. ... Contemnor / 5th Respondent Prayer: Contempt petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the contemnor / 5th respondent for his willful disobedience of the order passed by this Court made in W.P.(MD)No.16711 of 2024 dated 25.07.2024. For Petitioner : Mr.M.D.Poornachari For Respondents : Mr.M.P.Senthil, Government counsel. 2 CONT.P.(MD)NO.1449 OF 2026ORDERIt is reported that the order passed by this Court has since been complied with. In view of the same, this contempt petition is closed. NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No PMU To: The Tahsildar, Ramanathapuram District. 3 CONT.P.(MD)NO.1449 OF 2026G.R.SWAMINATHAN,J.PMU...
- ‹ Prev
- 562
- 563
- 564
- 565
- 566
- 568
- 569
- 570
- 571
- 572
- Next ›
- Last »