Chennai Orders Court June 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
R.Madhan vs Tata Capital Housing Finance Ltd
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-22-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 22.06.2026CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN and W.M.P.Nos.9911 and 13220 of 2024 1.R.Madhan S/o Rajan 2.Praveen Sherly W/o.R.Madhan, Both are having address at No.26/03, Thambiah Road, West Mambalam, Also at No.146/128 Lake View Road, West Mambalam Petitioners Vs 1.Tata Capital Housing Finance Ltd Rep. by its Authorised Officer Mambalam Branch 1st Floor, 6A Centennial Square, Dr Ambedkar Salai Kodambakkam, Chennai 600 024 2.S.Mahendran, New No.18, Old No.16, 46th Street, 7th Avenue, Ashok Nagar, Chennai.600 083. 3.R.Shanmugapriya, Flat No.1D, Block-11, 1st Floor, 4, Asvini Amarisa, No.77, Kalasathamman Kovil Street, Ramapuram, Chewnnai.600 089. 4.M/s.Pranav Tele-Ventures (P) Ltd., Through its Directors Shanmugapriya Ramani and Mahendran Srinivasan (Directors), Door No.12, New No.23, 1st Floor, South Road, West CIT Nagar, Chennai-600 035.(R2 to R4 impleaded as...
V.Anjamani Vs The Authorised Officer
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-22-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 22.06.2026CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN and W.M.P.Nos.9052 and 9054 of 2023 V.Anjamani S/o.S.Veerasamy, No.1/2, Marriyamman Koil Street, Kaspa Karanai Village, Kandachipuram Taluk Villupuram District 605 755 Petitioner Vs RespondentPRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of certiorari calling for the records, relating to the impugned sale notice of the respondent dated 08.02.2023 issue u/s. SARFAESI Act r/w Rule 8 (1) of Security Interest (Enforcement0 Rule 2002, quash the same as the same is arbitrary, illegal and ultravires, violation of the provisions of SARFAESI Act.For Petitioner(s): No Appearance For Respondent(s):Mr. I.M.Siddartha RamarajanORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) None for the petitioner when the matter is called out.2. Learned counsel for the respo...
HDB Financial service Limited Vs The Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-22-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 22.06.2026CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN HDB Financial Service Limited Having its Reg. office at Radhika, 2nd Floor Law Garden Road Navrangpura, Ahmedabad 380 009 Branch office at 4th Floor, Loyal Towers, Chennai 600 006 Rep. by its Authorised Officer P.Ananthakumar Petitioner Vs 5.J.Selvam (En. No.1838/2009 (Advocate Commissioner) Advocates Association Pudupet, Chennai 600 008 Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 2 to 5 to execute the order passed by the 1st respondent in Crl M.P. No. For Petitioner: Ms.D.Denipa for Mr.Ajmal Azzath For Respondents: No AppearanceORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the relief sought in this writ petition has become infructuous, as posse...
S.Neelaveni Vs NIL
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-22-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 22-06-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI IN CRP SR NO. 3868 OF 20241. S.Neelaveni w/o late S.Natarjan, 13/2, Vadugapalayam, Palladam West, Palladam Town, Palladam - 641 664 Appellant(s) Vs1. Nil Nil Respondent(s)PRAYER To condone the delay of 491 days in representing the above case papers in CRP SR No.3868 of 2024 on the file of this Hon'ble Court. For Appellant(s): MS.Elizabeth Ravi For Respondent(s):ORDERDelay condoned. This petition is ordered. Pbl Note: Registry is directed to number this petition, if it is otherwise in order and post the main CRP on 24.06.2026. T.V.THAMILSELVI J. pbl IN CRP SR NO. 3868 OF...
S.Thulasi, Vs Mr. Sivakumar,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-22-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 22-06-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE G. JAYACHANDRAN S.Thulasi, W/o.Shankaran, No.137, Chinna Street, Mittapettai Village and Post, Arakkonam Taluk, Ranipet District. Petitioner Vs.1. Mr. Sivakumar, Crime No.207/2024 ContemnorPrayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the Respondent for the disobedience of the order dated 23.10.2024 passed by this Hon'ble Court in Crl.O.P.No. 26215 of 2024. For Petitioner: Mr.P.Krishnan For Respondent: Mr.Arun Anbumani, (Crl.Side)ORDERThis Court, on 23.10.2024 in Crl.O.P.No.26215 of 2024, directed the respondent police to complete the investigation and file final report in Crime No.207 of 2024, pending since 09.06.2024. Time granted for the respondent Page Nos.1/4 police to complete the investigation and file the final report within three months. However, the respondent did not file the final report within the time prescribed. Hence, the present contem...
Shriram Finance Limited Vs Elanchezian.P
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-22-2026
A.No.2458 of 2026 in A.DR.No.40254 of 2026K.KUMARESH BABU, J.This application has been filed to condone the delay of 22 days in re-presenting the above A.DR.No.40254 of 2026 filed under Section 29-A.2. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant.3. Considering the averments madein the affidavit filed in support of this application and having been satisfied with the reasons stated therein, this Application is ordered and the delay is condoned. 22.06.2026 vji https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
T.Sathyanarayanan Vs The Authorized Officer
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-22-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 22.06.2026CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN and W.M.P.No.12280 of 2023 T.Sathyanarayanan S/o.Thillai Natarajan, No.64, Vth Block, 10th Street, Anna Nagar, Chennai-600 040. Petitioner Vs 1.The Authorized Officer 2.Sabitha Devi T.N Proprietor of Vetrivel Forgings, New No.9, Old No.58, II Street, Korattur, Chennai-600 080. RespondentsPRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of declaration declaring the sale conducted on 23.02.2023 by the 1st respondent bank in pursuant to sale notice (e-auction) dated 18.01.2023 selling the petitioners property located at S.No.1241/2 part, Plot No. B P 58 korattur Scheme Central Avenue 2nd Street Korattur Chennai-600 080 for underestimated price as illegal and void with a consequential direction to the 1st respondent bank to accept the deposit of the entire sale proceeds of...
The DGM Project (T) Project Director Vs The Arbitrator/District Collec ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-22-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 22-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P. VELMURUGAN AND THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI CMP No. 14907 of 2026 in The DGM Project (T) Project Director National Highways Authority of India, Project Implementation Unit (NS) Door No.212-3/D3-1, Sri Nagar Colony, Narasothipatti, Salem 636 004. ..Appellant(s) Vs3. Shri T.S.Kumarasamy S/o. Sengoden, Thirumangal Post, Thiruchengode Taluk, Namakkal District. ..Respondent(s) To Condone the delay of 252 days in re-presenting the appeal papers in Arb.Appeal SR No.48850 of 2026. Page1 of 4 For Petitioner(s): Mr. Su. Srinivasan For Respondent(s): Mr. M. Hemanth Kumar, Govt. Advocate for R1 & R2ORDER(Order of the Court was made by P.Velmurugan J.) This Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 252 days in re-presenting the appeal papers in Arb.Appeal SR No.48850 of 2026.2. The reason stated in the affidavit filed in support of this miscellaneous peti...
J. Srinivasan Vs The State Rep.by, The Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-22-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 22-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN J. Srinivasan ..Petitioner Vs1. The State Rep.by, The Inspector of Police,2. R.Kuppusamy3. K.Surendar ..RespondentsPRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, Act, 2023, to cancel the Anticipatory bail granted to the accused in Crl.M.P.No.438/2026 dated 25.02.2026 in Cr.No.54 of 2026 on the file of Polur Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District. For Petitioner: Mr.P.Veera Narayanan for Mr.R.Vijayakumar For Respondent: Mr.S.Yogaraja Sekar, Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side) for R1ORDERThe learned counsel appearing for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and has also made an endorsement to that effect. Page1 of 42. In view of the submission and the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. SHL To...
Indirani Vs Babukumar,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-22-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 22-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Indirani ..Petitioner(s) Vs Pappathi (Deceased) Selvaraj (Deceased) Devarajan (Deceased) Priya (Deceased)1. Babukumar2. Rumani3. Gopalakrishnan4. Ganesan5. Mallika6. Anandakumar7. Prabhu ..Respondent(s)This Civil Revision Petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to call for records pertaining to the Fair and Decreetal order passed by the learned II Additional District Munsif of Coimbatore in IA.No.4 of 2020 in O.S.No.2605 of 2004 dated 28.11.2022 and set aside the same. For Petitioner(s): Mr.B.Nedunzhelian For Respondent(s): Mr.R. Bharath Kumar For RR 2 to 4 Page1 of 2ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.RKMORDERThe learned counsel for the petitioner submits that subsequent to the filing of the Civil Revision Petition, the suit in O.S.No.2605 of 2004 has been disposed of by the II Additional District Munsif Court, Coimbatore, and therefore, nothing survives for f...
- ‹ Prev
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- Next ›
- Last »