Skip to content

Chennai Orders Court June 2026 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Jun 23 2026

Radhakrishnan Sreenivasan Vs Sun TV Network Limited

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Jun-23-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 23-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU IN Mr.Radhakrishnan Sreenivasan Head of Content, Chennai Super Kings Cricket Limited(CSKL) The Wings -Chaitanya 2726+84P , 1st Ave, Shastri Nagar, Adyar, Chennai, Tamil Nadu-600020 ..Applicant(s) Vs1. M/s Sun TV Network Limited Rep by its Authorised Signatory, Mr.M.Jyothibasu, Murasoli Maran Towers 73, MRC Nagar Main Road MRC Nagar, Chennai-600028.2. Chennai Super Kings Cricket Limited, Represented by its Managing Director The Wings - Chaitanya 2726+84P, 1st Ave, Shastri Nagar, Adyar,3. Mr.Kasi Viswanathan CEO & Managing Director The Wings - Chaitanya 2726+84P, 1st Ave, Shastri Nagar, Adyar,4. Mr.Avinash Sridharan Head of Finance The Wings- Chaitanya Page1 of 4 2726+84P, 1st Ave, Shastri Nagar, Adyar, Chennai, Tamil Nadu - 600 020. ..Respondent(s)PRAYER:- Application has been filed to delete the name of the Applicant from the array of parties as Defendant No. 4 in the present ...


Jun 23 2026

Kalaiselvi Vs Suryaprakash

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Jun-23-2026

inIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 23.06.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN in Kalaiselvi ... Petitioner Vs.1. Suryaprakash2. The State Rep byInspector of Police, Dharmapuri District 636701. ... Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, Act, 2023, to cancel the anticipatory bail granted to the first respondent/accused in Crl.O.P.No.15935 of 2025, dated 24.06.2025. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Sudhan For Respondents : Mr. J.Pradeep (For R1) Mr.N.Palanivel, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for R2inORDERThe learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Criminal Miscellaneous Petition as not pressed and has made an endorsement to that effect in the Court records.2. Recording the said endorsement, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed as not pressed. kv To1. The Inspector of Police, Dharmapuri District 636701. 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court ...


Jun 23 2026

Siva vs the Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation Ltd.

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Jun-23-2026

C.M.P.No.21163 of 2024 in Cross.OBJ. SR.No. 124546 of 2024A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.This petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 159 days in filing the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.2. The reasons adduced in theaffidavit filed in support of this petition being satisfactory, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is ordered and consequently, the delay of 159 days in filing the cross objection is condoned, subject to the condition that the claimant/petitioner will not be entitled to interest for the delay period i.e., for 159 days, in the appeal.23.06.2026 vca Note: Registry is directed to number the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, if it is otherwise in order, and list the same for admission in due course. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...


Jun 23 2026

Canara Bank Vs International Asset Reconstruction Company

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Jun-23-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 23.06.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN CMP Nos.25041 of 2023 in WA SR Nos.102135 of 2023 Canara Bank Rep. by its Manager, Spencer Tower-1, Ground Floor, No.770, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002. Applicant(s) Vs International Asset Reconstruction Company Rep. by its Senior Vice President and Business Head (South), Aruna Mannath, Door No.1, 9th Floor, Prashanth Real Gold Tower, D.No. 39, North Usman Road, T.Nagar, Chennai-600 017 and 10 others Respondent(s) For Applicant(s): Mr. M.L.Ganesh (Through Video Conferencing) For Respondent(s):Mr. Thriyambak J.Kannan for R1 Mr. K.Kumaran Government Pleader for R2, R3, R5 to R8 Mr. Akhil Akbar Ali for R4 Mr. S.Sivashanmugam for R10 Mr. Kabir Senior Counsel for Mr. T.M.Mano for R11 R9 - No AppearanceORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Heard learned counsel for the applicant. This applicatio...


Jun 23 2026

Peter vs the Ombudsman

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Jun-23-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 23-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN WP No.34411 of 2024 and WMP No.37290 of 2024 Peter Senior Citizen, S/o.David, No.21/1, Rupa Nagar (Ext), Sungam, Ramanathapuram, Coimbatore-641 045. ..Petitioner(s) Vs ..Respondent(s) Page1 of 4 Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to pay a damages sum of Rs.10 Lakhs to the Writ Petitioner on considering mail dated 04.09.2024 For Petitioner(s): Mr.T.Annaamalai For Respondent(s): F.B.Benjamin George for R1 Mr.Tarang K.Sancheti for Mr.T.Saikrishnan for R2 No appearance for R3 and R4ORDER(Order of the Court was made by The Chief Justice) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of the court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to avail the appropriate remedy.2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dis...


Jun 23 2026

M/S. Cholamandalam MS GIC Ltd, Vs Chennappan

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Jun-23-2026

C.M.P.No.14198 of 2026 in C.M.A.Sr.No.140858 of 2025A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.This petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 58 days in filing the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.2. The reasons adduced in theaffidavit filed in support of this petition being satisfactory, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is ordered and consequently, the delay of 58 days in filing the appeal is condoned. 23.06.2026 vca Note: Registry is directed to number the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, if it is otherwise in order, and list the same for admission in due course. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...


Jun 23 2026

K.Shabana Fathima Vs A.J.Mohammad Haroon

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Jun-23-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 23-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE and K.Shabana Fathima D/o.Marhoom Kutubudeen, No.7/3, Fakir Street, Royapuram, Chennai - 600 013. ..Petitioner(s) Vs A.J.Mohammad Haroon S/o.Marhoom Abdul Jaleel, TMTEC Trading and Technical Services LLC, Ghala AS Sinaiyyah, St.No.5206, Muscat, Oman. ..Respondent(s) 1) Declaring that the petitioner is the sole Guardian of the minor female child, Ziyan Fathima born on 16.01.2008. 2)Granting Permanent custody of the minor female child, Ziyan Fathima born on 16.01.2008 to the petitioner without any visiting rights for the respondent. For Petitioner(s): M/s.Kavitha Deenadayalan Damithalakshmi Deenadayalan Gayatri Ranganathan For Respondent(s): Aos Filed: Postal Track FiledORDERThis petition has been filed to declare that the petitioner is the sole Guardian of the minor female child, Ziyan Fathima born on 16.01.2008 and granting Permanent custody of the minor female child, Ziyan Fathim...


Jun 23 2026

M.S.K.Rameshraj vs the Director,

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Jun-23-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 23-06-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN M.S.K.Rameshraj Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Director,Central Bureau of Investigation , Head Quarters, Plot No.5B, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, 2.Serious Fraud Investigation Office, Head Quarters and Regional Office, 2nd Floor, PT Deen Dayal Andoyodaya Bhavan, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, 3.Indian Overseas bank, Assistant General Bank Manager, Asset Recovery Management Branch, Ground Floor, Central Office Building, 763, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002. Respondent(s)PRAYER Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus To issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction the 1st respondent (CBI) to register the case in investigate the complaint dated 04.10.2025 and thus render justice. For Petitioner(s): Mr.N.R.Elango, Senior Counsel for Mr.A.S.Aswin Prasanna For Respondent(s): Mr.K.Srinivasan, Special Public Prosecutor (CBI)...


Jun 23 2026

P.VELMURUGAN Vs The District Collector

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Jun-23-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 23-06-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN P.Velmurugan Petitioner(s) Vs1. The District CollectorO/o. The District Collector, 2.The Superintendent of Police O/o Superintendent of Police, 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer O/o. Revenue Divisional Officer , Namakkal District-637001. 4.The Inspector of Police O/o. The Inspector of Police, 5.The Tahsildar O/o. The Tahsildar, Namakkal District-637001. 6.M. Gavaskar7.Kavitha Respondent(s) PRAYER Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of mandamus, directing the Respondent Nos. 1 to 5 to provide adequate police protection to remove the illegal construction of concrete structure obstructing the pathway in Survey No.344/1A, and Patta No.04 at Sendhamanagalam Taluk Marurpatti Village, Namakkal District without any hindrance based on the proceedings by the Respondent No.5 in Na.Ka.2657/2022(Aa2) dated 09.05.2022 and Na.Ka.3391/2024/A5 dated 2...


Jun 23 2026

M/S.Bajaj Alliianz General Insurance Company Ltd vs Vairamani

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Jun-23-2026

C.M.P.No.14177 of 2026 in C.M.A.S.R.No.57024 of 2025A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.This petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 213 days in re-presenting the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.2. The reasons adduced in theaffidavit filed in support of this petition being satisfactory, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is ordered and consequently, the delay of 213 days in filing the appeal is condoned, subject to the condition that the claimant/petitioner will not be entitled to interest for the delay period i.e., for 213 days, in the appeal.23.06.2026 vca Note: Registry is directed to number the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, if it is otherwise in order, and list the same for admission in due course. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...


  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial