Chennai Orders Court June 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
R.Illango @ Satish vs the Managing Director
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
C.M.P.No.31240 of 2025 in C.M.A.SR.No.171607 of 2025A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.This petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 76 days in filing the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.2. Though notice has been served on the respondent and his name is printed in the cause list, there is no representation on his behalf.3. The reasons adduced in theaffidavit filed in support of this petition being satisfactory, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is ordered and consequently, the delay of 76 days in filing the appeal is condoned. 24.06.2026 ham Note: Registry is directed to number the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, if it is, otherwise, inorder and list the same along withCMA.Nos.972 of 2026 & 3768 of 2025. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
S.Ganapathy vs the Principal Secretary /
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
C.M.P.No.589 of 2026 in W.A.Sr.No.202629 of 2025 S. M. SUBRAMANIAM, J and R.SAKTHIVEL, J This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 15 days in filing the above writ appeal.2. Being satisfied with the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is ordered.3. Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order. (S.M.S.,J.) (R.S.V.,J.) 24-06-2026 gm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Shanmugam Vs State represented by The Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 24.06.2026CORAM:THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA in Shanmugam ... Petitioner Vs.1. The State represented by, The Inspector of Police, (Crime No.47 of 2025)2. Aadhav Arjuna ... RespondentsCriminal Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 528 r/w 442 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, to re-call the order dated 21.11.2025 made in Crl.O.P.No.28737 of 2025 so as to enable this petitioner/de facto complainant to be heard on merits. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Natarajan For R1 : Ms.R.S.Indira Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu For R2 : Mr.Pranav GopalakrishnanORDERThis recall petition is listed today under the caption for withdrawal.2. Today, when the matter was taken up, the learned counsel forthe petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw this petition filed to recall the order dated 21.11.2025 passed by this Court allowing Crl.O.P.No.28737 of 2025 filed for quashment of the FIR registered against the petiti...
State of Tamilnadu Vs D.Yacobu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
in AND (Order of the Court was made by N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.) These petitions are filed to condone the delay of 2383 and 888 days respectively in filing the petitions to set aside abatement caused due to the death of the respondents 18 and 27 in the writ appeal and also to bring on record their legal heirs as party respondents in the writ appeal.2. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the supportingaffidavits, these petitions are ordered. Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendments. Issue notice to the newly impleaded legal heirs of the deceased respondents 19 and 27 returnable by 27.07.2026.3. Post on 27.07.2026. [N.S.K., J.] & [M.J.R., J.] AND in...
The Branch Manager Vs Minor. Krish
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
C.M.P(MD)No.2699 of 2026 in C.M.A(MD)SR No.95360 of 2025K.MURALI SHANKAR, J.Pursuant to the direction of this Court in C.M.P(MD)No.2699 of 2025, dated 17.06.2026, the learned counsel for the petitioner has paid the cost of Rs.500/-and filed a copy of the cost memo to that effect.2. The said memo is recorded and the delay is condoned. Registry is directed to take the appeal on file, if it is otherwise in order and list the matter in the usual course. 24.06.2026 das 1/1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Sridhar Vs The State of Tamilnadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL Sridhar ...Petitioner Vs1. The Inspector of Police2. Jeyaprakash 3.Meenakshi ...RespondentsFor Petitioner : Mr.A.Joseph Jerry For R-1 : Mr.N.Balasubramanian Counselfor the State of Tamil Nadu(Crl.Side) For R-2&3 :Mr.R.M.Arunswaminathan PRAYER :- Petition filed under Sec.439(2) of BNSS to cancel the anticipatory bail granted to the respondents 2 and 3 in Crl.M.P.No.2480 of 2024 dated 27.09.2024 by the Principal District and Sessions Judge,ORDER : The Court made the following order :-This Petition has been filed to cancel the anticipatory bail granted to the respondents 2 and 3 in Crl.M.P.No.2480 of 2024 dated 27.09.2024 by the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Sivagangai.2. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on records.3. The main contention raised by the learned counsel appearing forthe petitioner for cancelling the anticipatory bail is that ...
The Branch Manager Vs S.Prabhu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
C.M.P(MD)No.2474 of 2026 in C.M.A(MD)SR No.14782 of 2026K.MURALI SHANKAR, J.Pursuant to the direction of this Court in C.M.P(MD)No.2474 of 2026, dated 17.06.2026, the learned counsel for the petitioner has paid the cost of Rs.1,000/-and filed a copy of the cost memo to that effect.2. The said memo is recorded and the delay is condoned. Registry is directed to take the appeal on file, if it is otherwise in order and list the matter in the regular course. 24.06.2026 das 1/1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
N.Bharakkathunnisha Vs 1.N.Rengachari (Died), 2.Moorthy
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
C.M.P(MD)Nos.3278, 3279 and 3280 of 2026 in S.A(MD)No.359 of 2014K.MURALI SHANKAR, J.Pursuant to the direction of this Court in C.M.P(MD)No.3278 of 2026, dated 15.06.2026, the learned counsel for the petitioner has paid the cost of Rs.1,500/-and filed a copy of the cost memo to that effect.2. The said memo is recorded andthe delay is condoned. Accordingly, CMP(MD)No.3278 of 2026 is allowed. Since the other petitions in CMP(MD) Nos.3279 and 3280 of 2026 are consequential in nature, the same are also allowed. Registry is directed to carry out the necessary amendments in the papers and list the matter on 08.07.2026. 24.06.2026 das 1/1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
S.Jenifa Kiruba Malar, Vs Dr.A.Ravindran,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 24-06-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI in Cont.P(MD)No.2002 of 20241. S.Jenifa Kiruba Malar, D/o.MTJ. Selvaraj No.10 K.M.A.Nagar Perumalpuram Tirunelveli District. Appellant(s) Vs1. Dr.A.Ravindran, Now presently working Mrs.Dr.P.Victoria ThangamRespondent(s) For Appellant(s): Mr.S.Chella Pandian For Respondent(s): M/s.M.R.Priyanka Jothi, Government Advocate(Civil) Prayer: To Re-open the contempt petition filed in Cont.P.(MD)No. 2002 of 2024 dated 18.12.2024.ORDERThis petition is filed to re-open the contempt petition filed in Cont.P.(MD)No.2002 of 2024 dated 18.12.2024.2. Heard the learned counsel on either side and carefully perused the materials available on record.3. This Court is not inclined to re-open the contempt petition. Hence, this petition is dismissed. 24-06-2026 gbg To 1.The Regional Director Of College Education...
The Chairman Vs Manikandan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
and AND (Order of the Court was made by N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.) This petition is filed seeking to condone the delay of 27 days in filing the above writ appeal.2. The learned counsel for the respondent has not raised any serious objection to the petition being allowed.3. Accepting the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, the delay is condoned and this petition is ordered. Registry is directed to number the writ appeal, if the papers are otherwise in order. [N.S.K., J.] & [M.J.R., J.] Page No.1/2 AND and Page No.2/2...
- ‹ Prev
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- Next ›
- Last »