Chennai Orders Court June 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M.Preetha vs the Commissioenr of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-18-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 18-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN M.Preetha D/o Mathangopla No 4 Palandiamman Koil Street, Periyakovilambakam Chennai-117. ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Commissioner Of Police Tambaram Chennai2. The Assistant Commissioner Of Police Pallikaranai, Chennai3. The Inspector Of Police S10 Pallikaranai Police Station, Pallikaranai Chennai4. Senthil Head Constable, S10 Police Station, Palliakaranai, Chennai5. Balamurugan Police Constable, S10 Pallikaranai Police Station, Chennai.6. Sezhiyan S/o Boopalan7. Jothi Father Name Not Known8. Ramapriya W/o Sezhiyan, 6-8 Are Residing At No17, Thennanthoppu Street, Kamaraj Nagar, Paruthipattu-71, Chennai.9. Corner Stone NO 174.5th STREET SARASWATHI NAGAR NEAR SRI RAGAVENDRA BRINDAVANAM TEMLLE THIRUMULLAIVOYAL CHENNAI-600062 (R9 SUO MOTU IMPLEADED AS PERORDER DT 07/02/2024 IN HCP NO 208/2024)10.Union Of India Rep By Its Secretary Ministry Of Soc...
E Soosai Das alais E Das and 4 others Vs The Repatriates Co-operative ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-18-2026
Application No.2435 of 2026 in Arb.O.P(Com.Div).Dr.No.15219 of 2026K.KUMARESH BABU, J.This application has been filed to condone the delay of 91 days in representing the Arb.OP.(com.div) Dr. No.15219 of 2026.2. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned counsel for the respondent.3. Considering the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of this application, this application is ordered as prayed for. 18.06.2026 mp Note: Registry is directed to number the arbitration original petition, if it is otherwise in order. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
M.M.Kamaraj Vs P.Ponniah, IAS., and another
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-18-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 18.06.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN M.M.Kamaraj ... Petitioner Vs. Chengalpattu District. ... Respondents Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, praying to punish the respondents for their willful and intentional disobedience to the order of this Court in W.P.No.22245 of 2025 dated 23.06.2025. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Naresh For Respondents : Ms.A.Suganya, Government AdvocateORDERThis Contempt Petition is prosecuted for failure of the respondents to comply with the order dated 23.06.2025 in W.P.No.22245 of 2025 passed by the Court.2. When this Contempt Petition was taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents submitted that the directions issued by this Court have been duly complied with vide order dated 27.04.2026.3. In view of the same, this Contempt Petition stands closed. No costs. cda Index : Yes/NoSpeaking order /Non Speaking OrderNeutral Citatio...
B.PRIYADURGA Vs The State of Tamil Nadu,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-18-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 18-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA IN ..Petitioner(s) Vs Higher Education Department, Fort St George,Chennai - 600 0093. The State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Its Principal Secretary To Government School Education Department Fort St. George, Chennai 600009.4. The Dierctor Of School Education Dierctorate Of School Education Dpi Campus, College Road5. The Joint Dierctor Of School Education (Higher Secondary) DPI Campus College Road6. The Tamil Nadu State Council For Higher Education Page1 of 4 Rep By Its Member Secretary Higher Education Department Office Of The Tamilnadu State Council For Higher Education Chennai...Respondent(s) W/o.G. Sakthivel, 15F, MMR Nagar, Perumandi Main Road, Old Palakkarai Kumbakonam - 612 Appellant(s) Vs Higher Education Department, Fort St George,Chennai - 600 009 Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): Mr..D.Umapathy For Respondent(s): Mr. A.R.Balaji Government Advocate R1, R3 to R5 Mr. C.Kathiravan Standing...
M.Vinothini Vs The State of Tamil Nadu,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-18-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 18-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA IN ..Petitioner(s) Vs Higher Education Department, Fort St George, Chennai - 600 0093. The State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Its Principal Secretary To Government School Education Department Fort St. George, Chennai 600009.4. The Dierctor Of School Education Dierctorate Of School Education Dpi Campus, College Road5. The Joint Dierctor Of School Education (Higher Secondary) DPI Campus College Road Page1 of 46. The Tamil Nadu State Council For Higher Education Rep By Its Member Secretary Higher Education Department Office Of The Tamilnadu State Council For Higher Education Chennai...Respondent(s) W/o. Senthil, No. 9/51, Nambikulam Street, Elavanasurkottai, Ulundurpet Taluk, Kallakurichi District. Appellant(s) Vs Higher Education Department, Fort St George,Chennai - 600 009 Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): M/s.D.Umapathy U.Muhammad For Respondent(s): Mr. A.R.Balaji Government Advocate R1, R3 to R...
Cholamandalam Investment And Finance Co Ltd Vs KAMAR INFRASTRUCTURE PR ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-18-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 18-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU M/s.Cholamandalam Investment And Finance Company Limited, Chola Crest, C 54 and 55, Super B-4, Thiru Vi Ka Industrial Estate, Guindy, Chennai 600 032. Represented by its Authorised Signatory. ..Petitioner(s) Vs M/s.Kamar Infrastructure Private Limited Kamar Estate Devicha Pada, Taloja Midc Panvel Raigarh, Behind Deepak Nitrate Ltd, Panvel, Maharashtra 410 208. ..Respondent(s)Prayer: Judges Summon filed under Order XIV Rule 8 of Original Side Rules, read with Section 9(1)(ii)(a)(b)(d) & (e) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to appoint employee of the Applicant viz Mr.Partha Bhattacharya, Regional Legal Manager, as Receiver to seize and take possession of the construction, which is more fully described in the schedule to the Judges Summons which is lying in the custody of respondent or respondents men, agents, servants from respondent premises or wherever found wit...
Cholamandalam Investment And Finance Co Ltd Vs KAMAR INFRASTRUCTURE PR ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-18-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 18-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU Arb.Appln. No.204 of 2026 M/s.Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Limited, Chola Crest, C 54 & 55, Super B-4, Thiru Vi Ka Industrial Estate, Guindy, Chennai 600 032. Represented by its Authorised Signatory ..Applicant Vs M/s.Kamar Infrastructure Private Limited, Kamar Estate Devicha Pada Taloja Mide Panvel Raigarh, Behind Deepak Nitrate Ltd., Panvel, Maharashtra 410 208. ..RespondentArbitration Application filed under Order XIV Rule 8 of Original Side Rules r/w.Section 9(1)(ii)(a)(b)(d) & (e) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, praying to appoint employee of the applicant viz., Mr.Partha Bhattacharya, Regional Legal Manager, as receiver to seize and take possession of the vehicle which is more fully described in the schedule to the Judges Summons which is lying in the custody of the respondent or respondents men, agents, servants from respondent premi...
B.Vijayakumari Vs P.Pradeepkumar
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-18-2026
C.M.P.No.13559 of 2026 in C.M.A.Sr.No.26846 of 2026A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.This petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 98 days in filing the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.2. The reasons adduced in theaffidavit filed in support of this petition being satisfactory, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is ordered and consequently, the delay of 98 days in filing the appeal is condoned. 18.06.2026 Sni Note: Registry is directed to number the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, if it is otherwise in order, and list the same for admission in due course. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
R.Easwary Vs M/s.Zeil Capital
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-18-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 18-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU Mrs.R.Easwary ..Applicant(s) Vs1. M/s.Zeil Capital Represented by its Partner, Mr.Ashok Kumar, MohanaMani Illam, Old Wahermenpet, Chennai - 600 021.2. Mr.Ashok Kumar Partner, Zeil Capital (Partnership Investment Firm), MohanaMani Illam, Old Washermenpet, Chennai - 600 021. ..Respondent(s)Petition filed under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to appoint an Arbitrator in the rank of retired District Judge to adjudicate the differences and disputes between petitioner and respondent arising out of Loan Agreement dated 30.11.2020. For Applicant(s): Mr.S.Praveenkanth For Respondent(s): Ms.Mamta Page1 of 3K.KUMARESH BABU, J.ORDERThe learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Arbitration Original Petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle.2. Recording the said submission of the learned couns...
K.SHANKAR Vs The Authorised officer
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-18-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 18.06.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN and WMP No.7435 of 20201. K.Shankar2. S.Kamatchi .. Petitioners -vs-3. S.Umadevi4. R.Gopi @ Santheeswaran5. R.Thiyagu6. T.Vijaya .. RespondentsPrayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to retrieve the documents mortgaged and deliver the same to the petitioner on payment of the offered settlement amount of Rs.2,70,00,000/- as per the OTS proposal dated 02.09.2019 given by the 2nd respondent in respect of Loan Account No(s).357.639.618, 357.785.2261 and 357.785.2257 by considering the reply dated 09.02.2020. For Petitioner : Ms.Pooja.J for Mr.D.Baskar *****ORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. An endo...
- ‹ Prev
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- Next ›
- Last »