Chennai Orders Court June 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Yogeswari Vs The Registrar
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-19-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 19-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN Yogeswari ..Petitioner Vs1. The Registrar2. The Registrar Page1 of 46. Narayanan S7. Thirugnanam ..RespondentsPrayer : Writ Petition (Criminal) filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1 st respondent to conduct the enquiry and take actions against respondents 6 and 7 based on petitioners representation dated 20.01.2026 and 26.01.2026. For Petitioner: Mr. A.S.Bhuvaneswaran For Respondents: Mr.R.Ganesh Kumar Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side) for R3 to R5ORDERThis Writ Petition (Criminal) has been filed seeking a direction to the first respondent to conduct an enquiry and take necessary action against the respondents 6 and 7, based on the petitioners representations dated 20.01.2026 and 26.01.2026.2. The learned Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondents 3 to...
The Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd vs Dhivya
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-19-2026
CMP No.11058 of 2026 in CMA SR No.201058 of 2025C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.andK.RAJASEKAR, J.(Order of the Court was made by C.V.Karthikeyan, J.) This petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 44 days in filing the appeal against the order dated 23.07.2025 passed in MCOP No.2861 of 2022 on the file of the MACT Chief Judge, Court of Small Causes, Chennai. 2.Notice had been directed to the respondents, notice had been served and counsel had entered appearance. It had been stated that owing to administrative reasons, there has been a delay of 44 days. 3.In view of the reasons stated, the delay stands condoned. Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order and list the appeal for admission. Registry may also print the name of the counsel for the respondents in the cause list when the appeal is posted for admission. (C.V.K.J., ) (K.R.S.J., ) sli 19.06.2026 (2/3) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
The Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd vs Gandhimathi
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-19-2026
CMP No.11055 of 2026 in CMA SR No.201057 of 2025C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.andK.RAJASEKAR, J.(Order of the Court was made by C.V.Karthikeyan, J.) This petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 44 days in filing the appeal against the order dated 23.07.2025 passed in MCOP No.2862 of 2022 on the file of the MACT Chief Judge, Court of Small Causes, Chennai. 2.Notice had been directed to the respondents, notice had been served and counsel had entered appearance. It had been stated that owing to administrative reasons, there has been a delay of 44 days. 3.In view of the reasons stated, the delay stands condoned. Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order and list the appeal for admission. Registry may also print the name of the counsel for the respondents in the cause list when the appeal is posted for admission. (C.V.K.J., ) (K.R.S.J., ) sli 19.06.2026 (1/3) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
The Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd vs Bharathi
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-19-2026
CMP No.11059 of 2026 in CMA SR No.197916 of 2025C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.andK.RAJASEKAR, J.(Order of the Court was made by C.V.Karthikeyan, J.) This petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 38 days in filing the appeal against the order dated 23.07.2025 passed in MCOP No.2863 of 2022 on the file of the MACT Chief Judge, Court of Small Causes, Chennai. 2.Notice had been directed to the respondents, notice had been served and counsel had entered appearance. It had been stated that owing to administrative reasons, there has been a delay of 38 days. 3.In view of the reasons stated, the delay stands condoned. Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order and list the appeal for admission. Registry may also print the name of the counsel for the respondents in the cause list when the appeal is posted for admission. (C.V.K.J., ) (K.R.S.J., ) sli 19.06.2026 (3/3) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
K.Chandrasekaran vs S.K.Giri
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-19-2026
in This Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 118 days in filing the above Civil Revision Petition.SR.No.117018 of 2025.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner(s) and perused the material available in the record.3. On being satisfied with the averments stated in the affidavit filed insupport of the petition, and finding the reason assigned by the petitioner(s) to be justifiable. Therefore, the delay in filing the above CRP SR.No.117018 of 2025, is condoned.4. Accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous petition is allowed.5. Registry is directed to list the above Civil Revision Petition after numbering the same, if they are otherwise in order. rri rri in...
S.Sankar Vs Mr. Dheeraj Kumar, IAS., and 3 others
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-18-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 18.06.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN S.Sankarr ... Petitioner Vs. Chennai 127. ... Respondents Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, praying to punish the respondents for their willful and intentional disobedience to the order of this Court in W.P.No.17085 of 2025 dated 15.07.2025. For Petitioner : Ms.V.Lakshmi For Respondents : Mr.G.Abraham Prabhu, Government Advocate for R1, R3 & R4ORDERThis Contempt Petition is prosecuted for failure of the respondents to comply with the order dated 15.07.2025 in W.P.No.17085 of 2025 passed by the Court.2. When this Contempt Petition was taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate appearing for respondents 1, 3 and 4 submitted thatthe directions issued by this Court have been duly complied with vide orderdated 08.06.2026.3. In view of the same, this Contempt Petition stands closed. No costs. cda To Chennai 127.C.KUMARAPPAN, J.cda...
United India Insurance Company Limited, Vs Ramesh,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-18-2026
C.M.P.No.13468 of 2026 in C.M.A.Sr.No.161700 of 2019A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.This petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 1,589 days in payment of deficit Court fee of Rs.1,500/- in the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.2. The reasons adduced in theaffidavit filed in support of this petition being satisfactory, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is ordered and consequently, the delay of 1,589 days in paying the deficit Court fee is condoned. 18.06.2026 Sni Note: Registry is directed to number the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, if it is otherwise in order, and list the same for admission in due course. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Future Generali India Insurace Co.Ltd Vs Pakkaththal
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-18-2026
C.M.P.No.13717 of 2026 in C.M.A.Sr.No.9093 of 2026A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.This petition has been filed to accept the name of the appellant as Future Generali India Insurance Co. Ltd., in the cause title of the above appeal.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.3. The reasons adduced in the affidavit filed in support of this petition being satisfactory, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition stands ordered.4. Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order and post the matter for admission in usual course. 18.06.2026 Sni https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
G.Krishnan, Vs Supriya Sahu, I.A.S., and another
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-18-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 18.06.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN G.Krishnan ... Petitioner Vs. Chennai 600 032. ... Respondents Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, praying to punish the respondents for their willful and intentional disobedience to the order of this Court in W.P.No.26676 of 2025 dated 22.07.2025. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Naresh For Respondents : Ms.A.Suganya, Government AdvocateORDERThis Contempt Petition is prosecuted for failure of the respondents to comply with the order dated 22.07.2025 in W.P.No.26676 of 2025 passed by the Court.2. When this Contempt Petition was taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents submitted that the directions issued by this Court have been duly complied with vide order dated 30.03.2026.3. In view of the same, this Contempt Petition stands closed. No costs. cda Index : Yes/NoSpeaking order /Non Speaking OrderNeutral Citation : Ye...
B.Sankaravelu C.I. Vs K. Gunasekaran and another
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-18-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 18.06.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN B.Sankaravelu C.I (Retired) ... Petitioner Vs. Chennai 600 002. ... Respondents Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, praying to punish the respondents for their willful and intentional disobedience to the order of this Court in W.P.No.23996 of 2025 dated 03.07.2025. For Petitioner : Mr.V.S.Jagadeesan For R1 : Mr.S.Pavithran, For R2 : Mr.C.S.K.Sathish,ORDERThis Contempt Petition is prosecuted for failure of the respondents to comply with the order dated 03.07.2025 in W.P.No.23996 of 2025 passed by the Court.2. When this Contempt Petition was taken up for hearing, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that the directions issued by this Court have been duly complied with.3. In view of the same, this Contempt Petition stands closed. No costs. cda Index : Yes/NoSpeaking order /Non Speaking OrderNeutral Citation : Yes/No To ...
- ‹ Prev
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- Next ›
- Last »