Chennai Orders Court May 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kathiresan vs the Secretary to Government
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29-05-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G. R. SWAMINATHAN Kathiresan, S/o.Ramasamy ..Petitioner Vs1. The Secretary to Government Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, Fort St.George, Chennai - 600 009.2. The Managing Director Tamil Nadu State Marketing corporation Ltd. (TASMAC) CMDA Tower II, 4th Floor, Gandhi Irwin Bridge Road, Egmore, Chennai - 600 008.3. The District Manager Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd. Tiruppur District, Tamil Nadu Ware Housing Corporation, Angeripalayam, Tiruppur - 641 602.4. The District collector Tiruppur District Karuppa Gaundampalayam, Tiruppur - 641 604. ..RespondentsWrit Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 18.05.2026 in accordance with law and to direct the respondents to refrain from taking any coercive action, inc...
Nadarajan Vs The State of Tamilnadu The Additional Chief Secretary to ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
Crl.M.P.No.8917 of 2026 in H.C.P.SR.No.31453 of 2026G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.ANDV.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J.Order of the Court was made byG.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed seeking to dispense with the production of the certified copy of theEnglish version of the detention orderpassed in C.M.P.No.36/Drug Offender/ Salem City/2026 dated 23.02.2026 by the second respondent, is ordered.2. The Registry is directed to number the Habeas Corpus Petition, if it is otherwise in order. (G.R.S.,J.) (V.L.N.,J.) 29.05.2026 ms/ mmi https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
R.L.Selvam vs the Secretary to Government
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29-05-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G. R. SWAMINATHAN R.L.Selvam, S/o. Loganatham ..Petitioner Vs1. The Secretary to Government Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, Fort St.George, Chennai - 600 009.2. The Managing Director Tamil Nadu State Marketing corporation Ltd. (TASMAC) CMDA Tower II, 4th Floor, Gandhi Irwin Bridge Road, Egmore, Chennai - 600 008.3. The District Manager Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd. Chennai (South) District, Plot No.B4, Industrial Estate, Ambattur, Chennai - 600 053.4. The District collector Chennai District, Rajaji Salai, Fourth Floor, 62, Beach Rd, George Town, Chennai - 600 001. ..RespondentsWrit Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 18.05.2026 in accordance with law and to direct the respondents to refrain from tak...
DR.NEERAJ KUMAR Vs The Director General of health Service,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29-05-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G. R. SWAMINATHAN IN Vs3. The National Medical Commission Vs Page1 of 4To implead the proposed party namely the National Medical Commission at Pocket -14 Sector -8, Dwarka Phase - I, New Delhi 110077 as 3rd Respondent in the above writ petition.Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to conduct special stray vacancy for post graduation admission for the academic year 2025- 2026 to fill up the 1140 vacant seats and also permit the petitioner to participate in the same. For Petitioner(s): Mr.E.NarayananORDERThis petition has been filed to implead the proposed 3 rd respondent, viz., National Medical Commission at Pocket -14 Sector -8, Dwarka Phase - I, New Delhi 110077, as 3rd respondent in W.P.No.20228 of 2026. Page2 of 4 2.Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition...
T.Seeni Baskaran vs the Secretary to Government
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29-05-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G. R. SWAMINATHAN T.Seeni Baskaran ..Petitioner Vs1. The Secretary to Government Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, Fort St.George, Chennai - 600 009.2. The Managing Director Tamil Nadu State Marketing corporation Ltd. (TASMAC) CMDA Tower II, 4th Floor, Gandhi Irwin Bridge Road, Egmore, Chennai - 600 008.3. The District ManagerTamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd. Kanchipuram (North) District, IMFS Depot, Bangalore High Road, Chembarambakkam Village, Thiruvallur District - 600 123.4. The District collector Kanchipuram District Thaiyar Kullam, Kanchipuram - 631 501. ..RespondentsWrit Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 18.05.2026 in accordance with law and to direct the respondents to refrain from taking any co...
Fathima Rinosa Vs The State, Represented by,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29.05.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G. R. SWAMINATHAN AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN and W.M.P. No.415 of 2026 Fathima Rinosa C/o.Navas ..Petitioner Vs1. The State, Represented by, The Deputy Inspector General of Prison, ..RespondentsPetition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned order dated 07.05.2026 vide No.1150 Tha.Ku.3/2026 passed by the 2nd Respondent and quash the same and consequently direct the 2nd Respondent to grant ordinary leave of 30 days without escort to the detenu Mohammed Navas S/o.Maheer Mohammad, aged about 55 years, bearing Trial Prisoner PID No.308347 confined at Central Prison, Puzhal II, Chennai.Page1 of 4 For Petitioner: Mr.P.Syed Abdul Mashood For Respondents: Mr.R.Ganesh Kumar, Counsel for Govt. of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side)ORDER(Order of the Court was made by ...
Gopi Vs The State rep by The Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29.05.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ Gopi ..Petitioner(s) Vs State Rep by Inspector of Police, (Crime No.Not known of 2026) ..Respondent(s) Prayer: The criminal original petition is filed under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023, pleased to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail in the event of the arrest pending investigation in Crime No.Not Known of 2026 on the file of respondent police. For Petitioner(s): Mr.S.Esakkimuthu For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Yogaraja Sekar Government Advocate (Crl.side)ORDERWhen the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw this Criminal Original Petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect. Page1 of 32. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed as 'withdrawn'. Note:1. Registry is directed to forthwith upload...
Hiyoshi india Ecological Services Pvt.Ltd Vs The State, Inspector of P ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
Crl.M.P.No.8921 of 2026 in Crl.R,C.SR.No.29952 of 2026MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 29 days in filing the Criminal Revision case.2. Mr.A.Amarnath, learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) takes notice for the first respondent.3. Notice to the second respondent returnable by 11.06.2026. Private notice is also permitted.3. Post the matter on 11.06.2026 29.05.2026 sma https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
G.Arul Manikandan Vs The Deputy Superintendent of Police, EOW, Trichy,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 29/05/2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR CRL RC(MD). No.848 of 2026 and Crl.M.P(MD).No.9909 of 20261. G.Arul Manikandan,2. T.S. Govindaraj,, ... Petitioners Vs1. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Eow, Trichy, Trichy. Crime No.4 of 2011.2. Net Com Information and Technology, No. A-10, Lakshmi Arcade, Trichy - 620018..3. Ding Dong Trading Net Com Information and Technology, No.A-10, Lakshmi Arcade, Trichy 620018. ... Respondents PRAYER :- This Criminal Revision Petition filed under Sections 438 r/w 442of the BNSS, 2023, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned orderdated 20.04.2026 passed in Cr.M.P. No. 117 of 2026 in C.C. No. 31 of 2013 on the file of the Special Court under the Tamilnadu Protection of Interests of Depositors (In Financial Establishment) Act, 1997 at Madurai and set aside the same. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Venkatesan, For Respondent : Mr.T.Lenin Kumar, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERT...
Srikanth Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Chatrakudi
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice K.MURALI SHANKAR Srikanth : Petitioner Vs The State represented by The Inspector of Police, (Crime No.133 of 2025) : Respondent For Petitioner : No Appearance. For Respondent : Mr.D.Venkatesh, Counsel for State of TN (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Section 482 of B.N.S.S. PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.133 of 2025 on the file of the Respondent police.ORDER : The Court made the following order :-The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 126(2), 296(b) and 132 of BNS and Sections 3 and 5 of TNPPDL Act, in Crime No.133 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation for the petitioner. The learned Counsel for State of Tamil Nadu (Crl.Side) would submit that th...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »