Chennai Orders Court May 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rajapandi Vs The State Of Tamilnadu Rep By The Inspector Of Police, Pa ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: May-27-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 27-05-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR in Crl.O.P(MD).No.7583 of 2026 1.Rajapandi 2.Rasika Meena 3.Ilayaraja @ Chinnsamy 4.Manjuladevi 5.Pandiyammal 6.Kasimayan 7.Manikandaprabu 8.Muthupeyathevar @ Mokkai 9.Pandiselvi 10.Sutha Petitioner(s) Vs 1.The State Of Tamilnadu Rep By (Crime No.108 of 2026) Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): Mr.A.Ajith Prakash For Respondent(s): Mr.T.Leninkumar Counsel for State of Tamilnadu (Crl.side) Prayer: To relax the condition imposed on the petitioners in Crl.O.P.(MD) No.7583 of 2026 on the file of this Court dated 28.04.2026.ORDERThis petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed against the petitioners in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.7583 of 2026 dated 28.04.2026. 2.The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are complying with the condition till today, without fail. 3.The above submission is admitted by the learned counsel for the State of Tamilnadu (Criminal...
G.Bakiyam Vs State of Tamilnadu Rep by
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: May-27-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) PRESENT The HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR G.Bakiyam ... Petitioner/ Accused Vs State of Tamilnadu Rep By, The Inspector of Police, Trichy District. ... Respondent/ Complainant For Petitioner : B.Jameelarasu, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.T.Lenin Kumar, Counsel for State of Tamil Nadu, (Crl. side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.Not known on the file of the respondent Police.ORDER : The Court made the following order :-The petitioner, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 318(4), 336(3), 340(2) and 336(2) of BNS, in Crime No.Not known of 2026, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.2. When this petition is taken up for hearing,the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that after filing this petition, an FIR came to be registere...
Velandi Vs The Deputy Superintendent of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: May-27-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURTCORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR W.P.Crl.(MD) No.2863 of 2026 Velandi ...Petitioner Vs.Virudhunagar District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to grant permission and necessary protection to perfrom the cultural programme i.e., Adal Padal prgoramme on 27.05.2026 at 07.00p.m. To 11.00p.m. In ''Sri Ayyanar Sri Karuppasamy Sri Muneeswarar Sri Ulaganayagi Amman Pongal Urchava Thiruvizha Festival'' Keezhkuid Village, Aruppukottai, Virudunagar District, based on the petitioner's representation dated 25.05.2026 pending on the file of the respondents and pass such further or other orders. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Veerachamy For Respondents : Mr.S.Siva Subramanian Counsel for State of TN (crl.side)ORDERThe present Writ Petition has been filed seeking Mandamus, directing the 2nd r...
Ganesan Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Munneerpalla ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: May-27-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 27.05.2026 THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR Ganesan ... Petitioner Vs State Rep.By, the Inspector of Police, (Crime No.581 of 2026) ... Respondent PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.581 of 2026 on the file of the Respondent Police. For Petitioner : Mr.D.Jeganathan For Respondent : Mr.S.Sivasubramanian Counsel for the State of Tamil Ndu (Crl.Side)ORDERThe petitioner/accused, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offence under Section 309(4) of BNS and Section 3 of Tamil Nadu Property (Prevention of Damage and Loss) Act, 1992, in Crime No.581 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that there was a money dispute between the parties, due to which, the petitioner along with the other accused persons attacked the vehicle belonging to the defacto complainant and and took the amount brought by him. Hence...
Mohana Sundaram Vs The Superintendent of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: May-27-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 27.05.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR W.P.Crl.(MD) No.2870 of 2026 Mohana Sundaram ...Petitioner Vs.1. The Superintendent of Police, O/o. The Superintendent of Police2. The Inspector of Police K.Paamathi Police Station3. Vivek Kumar ... RespondentsPRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1 and 2 respondents to consider petitioner's representation and conduct enquiry in complaint dated 23.05.2026 against the 3rd respondent for his illegal act and to provide protection to the petitioner and his family and pass such further or other orders. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Lenin For Respondents : Mr.S.Siva Subramanian Counsel for State of TN (crl.side)ORDERThe present Writ Petition has been filed seeking Mandamus, directing the 1st and 2nd respondents to consider petitioner's representation and conduct enquiry in complai...
G SARANYA Vs The State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: May-27-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) PRESENT The HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR CRL OP(MD)No.9901 of 20261. G Saranya2. L Niroshan ... Petitioners /Accused Vs State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Trichy District. ... Respondent/ Complainant For Petitioners : B.Jameelarasu, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.T.Lenin Kumar, Counsel for State of Tamil Nadu (Crl. side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Cr.No.Not known of 2026 on the file of the respondent police.ORDER : The Court made the following order :-The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 318(4), 336(3), 340(2) and 336(2) of BNS, in Crime No.Not known of 2026, on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.2. When this petition is taken up for hearing,the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that after filing this pe...
T.Ajithkumar Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: May-27-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) PRESENT The HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR1. T.Ajithkumar2. Manojkumar3. Arunpandi ... Petitioners/Accused Vs State of Tamilnadu Rep by Inspector of Police, Periyakulam Theni District. Crime No.402 of 2026. ... Respondent/ComplainantFor Petitioner : Mr.Vishnu J, For Respondent : Mr.D.Venkatesh, Counsel for State of TN (Crl.Side) PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.402 of 2026 on the file of the respondent Police.ORDER : The Court made the following order :-The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.2. Recording the same, the Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. (K M S J) 27.05.2026 PNM TO1. The Inspector of Police, Periyakulam, Theni District2. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. K.MURALI SHANKAR,J PNMORDERIN CRL OP(MD) No...
Muthu S Vs The State of Tamilnadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: May-27-2026
Crl.M.P.(MD)No.9967 of 2026 in Crl.R.C.(MD)SR.No.26900 of 2026K.MURALI SHANKAR,J.Dispensed with for the present.2. The Registry is directed to number the revision, if it is otherwise in order. 27.05.2026 pnm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Vetrivel Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Pattiveeran ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: May-27-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 27-05-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR in Crl.O.P(MD).No.8189 of 2026 Vetrivel Petitioner(s) Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Crime No.108 of 2026. Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): Mr.A.Ajith Prakash For Respondent(s): Mr.T.Leninkumar Counsel for State of Tamilnadu (Crl.side) Prayer:To relax the condition imposed on the petitioner in Crl OP.(MD). No.8189 of 2026 on the file of this Court dated 27.04.2026.ORDERThis petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed against the petitioner in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.8189 of 2026 dated 27.04.2026. 2.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is complying with the condition till today, without fail. 3.The above submission is admitted by the learned counsel for the State of Tamilnadu (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police. 4.Considering the above, the condition is modified and the petitioner is directed to appear befo...
Devaki @ Devi Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Ramjin ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: May-27-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 27-05-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR in Crl.O.P(MD).No.6571 of 2026 1.Devaki @ Devi 2.Nisha Petitioner(s) Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Crime no.116 of 2026. Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): Mr.N.Ananda Kumar For Respondent(s): Mr.T.Leninkumar Counsel for State of Tamil Nadu(Crl.side) Prayer: To relax the condition imposed on the petitioner in Crl OP.(MD). No.6571 of 2026 dated 15.04.2026 and thus render justiceORDERThis petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed against the petitioners in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.6571 of 2026 dated 15.04.2026. 2.The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are complying with the condition till today, without fail. 3.The above submission is admitted by the learned counsel for State of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police. 4.Since the petitioners are complying with the condition without fail and there are...
- ‹ Prev
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Next ›
- Last »