Chennai Orders Court April 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ayyadurai Vs The Superintendent of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
W.M.P.Crl.(MD)No.437 of 2026 in W.P.Crl.(MD)No.1496 of 2026L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit, this petition is ordered.2. Registry is directed to carry out the necessary amendment in the cause- title. 01.04.2026 gbg 1/1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
N.Rajagopalan Vs Priyanka Pankajam
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
1 CONT.P.(MD)NO.1336 OF 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 01.04.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN AND THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE R.POORNIMA in N.Rajagopalan ... Petitioner / Petitioner Vs.1. Mrs.Priyanka Pankajam,IAS, District Collector,2. Mr.A.Senthilkumar, Divisional Engineer,3. Mr.Selvaraj, Assistant Divisional Engineer,4. Mr.Dharmaraj, Tahsildar, Thanjavur District. ... Contemnors/Respondents 1 to 4 2 CONT.P.(MD)NO.1336 OF 2025Prayer: Contempt petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the respondents for the disobedience of the order in W.P.(MD)No.25142 of 2024 dated 26.11.2024. For Petitioner : Mr.N.Suresh For Respondents : Mr.T.Amjad Khan, Government Advocate.ORDER(By G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.) Heard both sides.2. The learned Government Advocate representing the respondents submits that the encroachment in question was removed on 20.06.2025 and that the order of this court has been complied with.3. Recordin...
M/S.Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd vs Palanisamy
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 01.04.2026CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR and M/s.Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd., Bajaj Finserv Building, 1st Floor, Behind Weikfield IT Park, Viman Nagar, Pune-411014 represented by its Branch Manager ... Appellant/ 2nd Respondent Vs. 1.Palanisamy ... 1st Respondent/ Petitioner 2.Y.Gokul ... 2nd Respondent/ 1st Respondent PRAYER : Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act 1988, to set aside the order and decreetal order passed in M.C.O.P.No.108 of 2020 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karur, dated 04.03.2025. For Appellant : M/s.K.R.Shivashankari For Respondents : Mr.P.Jeganathan for R1 No appearance for R2JUDGMENTThe Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is directed against the award passed in M.C.O.P.No.108 of 2020 dated 04.03.2025 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal / Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karur.2. When the matter i...
J. Tamilrajan vs M.G.M.Ramesh
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 01.04.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN in J.Tamilrajan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.M.G.M.Ramesh, Secretary, Thoothukudi District 628 001. 2.The District Educational Officer, (R2 is suo motu impleaded as per order of this Court dated 12.11.2025 in Cont.P.(MD)No.1071 of 2023 by GRSJ) 3.The Headmaster, Thoothukudi District-628 001. ... Respondents (R3 is suo motu impleaded as per order of this Court dated 26.11.2025 in Cont.P(MD)No.1071 of 2023)Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the respondents herein for their deliberate and willful disobedience of the order of this Court dated 21.03.2023 passed in W.P.(MD)No.25353 of 2022 which is amounting to contempt of Court under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Meenakshi Sundaram For Respondent : Mr.C.Venkatesh Kumar Special Government Pleader for R2 : Mr.T.Cibi Chakraborthy for R1ORDERThe headmaster of th...
Athimoolam Vs V.P.Jeyaselan IAS.,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
1 CONT.P.(MD)NO.1525 OF 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 01.04.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN AND THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE R.POORNIMA Athimoolam ... Petitioner / Petitioner Vs.1. Thiru.V.P.Jeyaselan, IAS, District Collector, Virudhunagar,2. Thiru.R.Rajendran, District Revenue Officer, District Revenue Office,3. Thiru.Sivakumar, Revenue Divisional Officer, Sattur,4. Tmt.Marreswari, Tahsildar, Tahsildar Office, Vambakottai, 2 CONT.P.(MD)NO.1525 OF 20255. Tmt.Mageswari, Block Development Office(Village Panchayat), Vembakottai,6. Tmt.Porkodi, Village Administration Officer, Keelamarainadu, Alangulam, Virudhunagar District. ... Contemnors / RespondentsPrayer: Contempt petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the contemnor / third respondent for willful disobedience of the order dated 30.01.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.(MD)No.2613 of 2025 and punish them for contempt. For Petitioner : Ms.S.Meena For Re...
Gopinath Vs Jayeseelan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
1 CONT.P.(MD)NO.1596 OF 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 01.04.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN AND THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE R.POORNIMA Gopinath ... Petitioner / Petitioner Vs.1. Mr.Jeyaseelan, District Collector / Monitoring Committee, Virudhunagar District. ... Contmenor / RespondentsPrayer: Contempt petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, against the contemnor / respondent herein for his willful disobedience to comply with the order passed by this Court in W.P.(MD)No.29758 of 2024 dated 10.12.2024. For Petitioner : Mr.N.Jeyaram Sidharth For Respondents : Mr.G.V.Vairam Santhosh, Additional Government Pleader. 2 CONT.P.(MD)NO.1596 OF 2025ORDER(By G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.) Pursuant to the order dated 10.12.2024 passed by this Court, the respondents had removed the encroachment in question on 26.08.2025. Intimation to this effect was also duly communicated to the petitioner vide letter dated 16.09.2025. Copy of the s...
The Correspondent Vs Kannappan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
1 CONT.P.(MD)NO.1612 OF 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 01.04.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN AND THE HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE R.POORNIMA in The Correspondent, St.Teresa's Higher Secondary School, Vadakankulam-627 116, Tirunelveli District. ... Petitioner / Petitioner Vs.1. Mr.Kannappan, Director of School Education,2. Mr.Sivakumar, Chief Educational Officer,3. Mr.Sai Subbulakshmi, District Educational Officer, Thirunelveli District-627 001. ... Contemnors /RespondentsPrayer: Contempt petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act, 1971, to punish the respondents / contemnors herein for their deliberate and willful disobedience of 2 CONT.P.(MD)NO.1612 OF 2025 the order of this Court dated 02.03.2018 in W.P.(MD)No.8429 of 2017 under Article 215 of the Constitution of India r/w. Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Ragatheesh Kumar, for M/s.Isaac Chambers. For Respondents : Mr.C.Venkatesh Kuma...
Nagarajan.M Vs The District Collector (Development Section)
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 01.04.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR WP(MD)No.16949 of 2022 M.Nagarajan .. Petitioner - Vs. - Kalakkadu,3. The General Manager, The Mukkuperi Co-Operative Urban Bank Ltd.,No.1657, No.10/36, South Street, Mukkuperi, Thoothukudi - 628 616. .. RespondentsPrayer : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records and proceedings of the 2nd respondent in Na.Ka.No. Aa2 / 6124 / 2018 dated 07.07.2022 and quash the same as illegal and consequently to direct the 3rd respondent to issue No dues Certificate to the petitioner pertaining to Loan Account No.7509within the period that may be stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Ms.P.Yasmin Begum For R1 & R2 : Mr.PB.Ahamed Yasmin Parvin Government Advocate For R3 : Mr.M.P.Senthil The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdr...
The Branch Manager Vs FATHIMA IRFANA
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
C.M.P.(MD)No.10807 of 2025 in C.M.A.(MD)No.1042 of 2024K.MURALI SHANKAR, J.The above petition is filed to ordersubstituted service of notice to the respondents 5 and 6 by way of publishing the notice in any one of the daily Newspaper in C.M.A.(MD)No.1042 of 2024.2. No representation for the respondents 2 and 3.3. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the learned counsel appearing for the first respondent and the learned counsel appearing for the fourth respondent. Records perused.4. Being satisfied with the reasonsstated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, this petition is ordered and the petitioner is permitted to effect substituted service for the respondents 5 and 6, by paper publication in Tamil Daily viz., Malai Malar, in Tirunelveli Edition, indicating the next date of hearing as 29.04.2026. The publication shall be effected on or before 17.04.2026.5. Post the matter on 29.04.2026. 01.04.2026 csm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Dharmar Vs The Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 01.04.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI Dharmar ... PetitionerversusThe State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Theni District. ... Respondent Petition filed under Section 389(1) of Cr.P.C. to suspend the sentence and enlarge the petitioner on bail imposed in the Judgment dated 28.07.2021 made in Spl.S.C.No.24 of 2017 on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Fast Track Mahila Court, Theni, pending disposal of the above appeal. For Petitioner : Mr.S.S.Sundara Pandi For Respondent : Mr.S.Prakash Government Advocate (Crl. side)ORDERToday, when this petition is taken up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this criminal miscellaneous petition is dismissed as withdrawn. ogy To1. The Inspector of Police, ...
- ‹ Prev
- 494
- 495
- 496
- 497
- 498
- 499
- 500
- 501
- 503
- 504
- Next ›
- Last »