Chennai Orders Court April 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Akash alias Jeyarajan Vs State of Tamilnadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 01/04/2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL Akash Alias Jeyarajan ... Petitioner/Sole Accused Vs State of Tamilnadu Rep by, The Inspector of Police, (Crime No.39 of 2025). ... Respondent/Complainant PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.39 of 2025 on the file of the respondent Police. For Petitioner : B.Micheal Sebastin, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.B.Nambi Selvan, Additional Public ProsecutorORDER : The Court made the following order :-The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent for the offences punishable under Sections 11(3) & 12 of POCSO Act in Crime No.39 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.2. When the matter came up for hearing, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the matter has been closed as 'Mistake of Fact'. Therefore, the question of grant of anticipatory bail does not arise.3. Recording the same, this Criminal...
Nadhan Vs The State of Tamil Nadu,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 01/04/2026CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR CRL OP(MD).No.6338 of 2026 Nadhan ... Petitioner Vs1. The State represented by The Superintendent of Police,3. Senthil ... RespondentsPRAYER :- Criminal Original petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, to direct the 2nd respondent police not to harass the petitioner in the guise of enquiry on the basis of the complaint given by the 3rd respondent based on the representation given by the petitioner dated 24.03.2026 and pass any other orders. For Petitioner : M/s.A.Banumathy For Respondents : Mr.R.Meenakshi Sundaram Additional Public Prosecutor R1 & R2The present petition has been fled seeking direction as against the respondent police not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry.2. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the 2ndrespondent submitted that the complaint was lodged by the 3rd respondent against the petitioner on 24.03.2026, and on ...
M.Senthamizh Selvan Vs The Secretary
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 01.04.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN W.P.(MD)No.8953 of 2026 M.Senthamizh Selvan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu, Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009. 2.The Director General of Police, Tamilnadu Police, Chennai. 3.The District Collector, 4.The Superintendent of Police, 5.The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Aadurai, Thanjavur District. 6.M.K.Stalin ...RespondentsPRAYER:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the third respondent to take necessary preventive and regulatory measures to monitor mass marriage schemes and functions so as to prevent occurrence of child marriages. For Petitioner : Mr.R.L.Dhilipan Pandian for Mr.K.Vijayan For Respondents : Mr.D.Sasikumar (R1 & R3) Additional Government Pleader Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabakar (RR2, 4 & 5) Additional Pub...
Boominathan Vs The State of Tamilnadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
1 H.C.P.(MD)NO.417 OF 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 01.04.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN AND THE HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE R.POORNIMA Boominathan ... Petitioner / Father of detenu Vs.3. Rajapandi ... RespondentsPrayer: Habeas Corpus petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to produce the person or body of the petitioner's daughter by name Gayathri aged about 22 years before this Court. 2 H.C.P.(MD)NO.417 OF 2026 For Petitioner : Mr.C.M.Arumugam For Respondents : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar, Additional Public Prosecutor.ORDERHeard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for respondents 1 and 2.2. The petitioner is the father of the detenu. The detenu is anyoung woman aged about 22 years. According to the second respondent, it appears to be a case of elopement. Be that as it may, based ...
The Branch Manager Vs Tamil Ilakkiya
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
C.M.P.(MD)No.4182 of 2026 in Rev.Aplc(MD)SR.No.101396 of 2025K.MURALI SHANKAR,J.The above petition has been filed seeking orders to condone the delay of 126 days in paying the deficit Court fee of Rs.2,240/- in the above review application.2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has already paid the deficit Court fee.4. Considering the above, this Court is inclined to condone the delay. Accordingly, this petition is ordered. 01.04.2026 csm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
A.Ragulraj. Vs State of Tamil Nadu Rep by
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 01/04/2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL A.Ragulraj ... Petitioner/Accused (Rank Not Known) Vs State of Tamil Nadu Rep By, The Inspector of Police, (Crime No. No Known of 2026). . .. Respondent/Complainant PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No. on the file of the respondent Police. For Petitioner : Mr. Sundaravadivel. C, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.P.Kottaichamy, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDER : The Court made the following order :-The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent for the offence punishable under Section 4(1)(A) of TNP Act, in Crime No.Not Known of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.2. When the matter taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent would submit that the petitioner herein is not an accused in this case.3. Recording the same, this Criminal Original Petition stands closed. 01.04.20...
A.Kannan Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Dcb(I)
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 01/04/2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL1. A.Kannan2. M.Balamurugan ... Petitioners/Accused (Rank Not Known) Vs State of Tamilnadu Rep by, The Inspector of Police, Madurai District, Crime No. Not Known of 2026. ... Respondent/Complainant PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No. Not Known of 2026 on the file of the respondent police For Petitioner : Mr.Ragaventhra for Mr.K.Jeyamohan, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.P.Kottaichamy, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDER : The Court made the following order :-The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent for the offences punishable under Sections 318(4) & 351(3) of BNS, in Crime No.Not Known of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.2. When the matter came up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent would submit that the matter was enquired and closed and no further order is re...
N.Sarathkumar Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Navalp ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 01/04/2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL N.Sarathkumar ... Petitioner/Accused Rank Not Known Vs State of Tamilnadu Rep by, The Inspector of Police, Crime No.Not Known of 2026. ... Respondent PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No. Not Known of 2026 on the file of the respondent Police. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Ramakrishnan Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.P.Kottaichamy, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDER : The Court made the following order :-The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of therespondent for the offences punishable under Sections 296(b), 115(2) & 351(2) of BNS and Section 4 of Tamilnadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, 1998,, in Crime No.Not Known of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.When the matter taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) would submit that based on the complaint given by the complainant, FIR was registered in C...
Jesuraja Vs The Authorized Officer
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 01.04.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.7191 and 7192 of 2026 Jesuraja ... Petitioner Vs. The Authorised Officer, Shriram Finance Limited, No.5, Ramachandrapuram, Tennur, Trichy. ...Respondent PRAYER:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned demand notice dated 07.01.2026 issued by the respondent and quash the same.For Petitioner : Mr.J.SivaramORDER(Order of the Court was made by N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.) This writ petition is filed challenging the demand notice dated 07.01.2026 issued by the respondent. 2.In view of the order proposed to be passed in this writ petition, notice to the respondent is dispensed with. 3.By consent of both parties, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the time of admission itself.4.At the outset, this Court i...
Kingson Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 01/04/2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL Kingson ... Petitioner/Accused (Rank Not Known) Vs State of Tamilnadu Rep by, The Inspector of Police, (Crime No. Not Known of 2026). ... Respondent PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.Not Known of 2026, on the file of the respondent Police. For Petitioner : V.Karthick Raja, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.P.Kottaichamy, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDER : The Court made the following order :-The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent for the offences punishable under Sections 318(4), 296(b) and 351(3) of BNS Act, 2023 in Crime No. Not Known of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.2. When the matter came up for hearing, the learned GovernmentAdvocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent would submit that based on the complaint lodged by the complainant, enquiry was conducted and thereafter, the same was closed.3. ...
- ‹ Prev
- 494
- 495
- 496
- 497
- 498
- 499
- 500
- 502
- 503
- 504
- Next ›
- Last »