Chennai Orders Court April 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Parimala vs Dinesh Kumar Bora
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-28-2026
This Court, vide order dated 16.04.2026, allowed this civil miscellaneous petition by condoning the delay of 104 days in filing the above first appeal on condition that the petitioner pays cost of Rs.3,000/- to the respondent on or before 27.04.2026 and directed the matter to be posted today under the caption for reporting compliance.2. Today, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that theaforesaid order has been complied with and he also produced a photocopy of the Demand Draft dated 24.04.2026 for a sum of Rs.3,000/- drawn in favour of the respondent, to that effect. The compliance is recorded. The Registry is directed to number the first appeal, if it is otherwise in order. nsd Page1 of 2 nsd Page2 of 2...
The Manager Vs R.Kumar
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-28-2026
CMP.No. 10128 of 2026 in CMA SR.No.93154 of 2025R.KALAIMATHI, J.This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 133 days to pay the deficit court fee in the above Civil Miscellaneous appeal.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.3. Accepting the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, this petition is ordered and the delay of 133 days in paying the deficit court fee is hereby condoned. 28.04.2026 kkd https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Chinnapappa Vs Tamil Nadu Transport Co.Ltd (Salem)
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-28-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 28-04-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE R. KALAIMATHI1. Chinnapappa W/o. Narayanan, Salem District.2. Narayanan Salem District. .. Petitioners Vs. Tamil Nadu Transport Co.Ltd (Salem) Managing Director, 12, Ramakrishna Road, Salem. ..Respondent (s)Prayer : This Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 173(1) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, to Condone the delay of 3347 days in filing the above CMA against the order dated 20.10.2014 made in MCOP No. 1274 of 2011 on the file of the MACT, Special District Court, Salem . For Petitioners : Mr.S.P.Yuaraj For Respondent : Mr.D.NitinORDERHeard the learned counsel for the petitioners. Page1 of 2R.KALAIMATHI, J.KKD2. Mr.Jagadeesan learned representing counsel would submit that he undertakes to file vakalat for the respondent(TNSTC) Salem and he has got objection in allowing this petition.3. The first petitioner would aver that on account of the accident thatoccurred on 06.02.2011, she los...
The Branch Manager Vs R.Gopinath
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-28-2026
CMP.No.11078 of 2026 in CMA.SR.No.138708 of 2025R.KALAIMATHI, J.Heard.2. This Civil Miscellaneous Petition, which is filed to condone the delay of 57 days in filing the above Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, is ordered. 28.04.2026 kkd https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
TATA AIG General Insurance Co.Ltd Vs Vedhapuri
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-28-2026
CMP.No.10299 of 2026 in CMA SR.No.46127 of 2026R.KALAIMATHI, J.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.2. This petition is ordered as prayedfor and production of certified copy of the Award dated 22.01.2026 passed in M.C.O.P.No.3362 of 2022 by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/IV Court of Small Causes, Chennai, is hereby dispensed with for the present. 28.04.2026 kkd https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
V.Sathyamurthi Vs K.Madhumathi
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-28-2026
C.M.P.No.10429 of 2026 in Appeal (CAD) No.SR57189 of 2025P.VELMURUGAN, J.andK.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J.(Order of the Court was made by P.VELMURUGAN, J.) This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 234 days in re-presenting the above appeal. 2 Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this miscellaneous petition, the delay of 234 days in re-presenting the above appeal is condoned. [PVJ] [KGTJ] 28.04.2026 cgi Note: Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
M/s.Nova Life Space Private Limited Vs R.M.Nachiappan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-28-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 28-04-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY M/s.Nova Life Space Private Limited Represented by its Director Mrs.R.Savithri, Bay City Centre, Old No.197, New No.309, 2nd Floor, Poonamalle High Road, Chetpet, Chennai - 600 031. ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. R.M.Nachiappan S/o.Mr.N.Ramanathan Chettiyar, New No.12(Old No.21), Chennai - 600 084.2. Mrs Nachammai Wife of Mr. R.M. Nachiappan, New No.12 Old No.21, Raja Annamalai Road, Chennai 600 0843. Mrs N Chindhamani Daughter of Mr. R.M. Nachiappan, Temporarily residing at Unit No.711, 35, Trail Wood Drive, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada L4Z 3L6. Page1 of 44. Mr N RamanathanSon of Mr. R.M. Nachiappan, Temporarily residing at No.1517, Spring Water Way, Highlands Ranch, Colorado 80129, USA ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Arbitration Original Petition (Commercial Division) is filed under Section 11(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to appoint a sole arbitrator to adjudicate an...
Arulmigu Ulageswarasamy and Varadaraja Perumal Temples Vs Palanisamy G ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-28-2026
CMP.No.11008 of 2026 in STA.Sr.No.44168 of 2025S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.ANDK.SURENDER, J.Ordered, as prayed for. (S.M.S., J.) (K.S., J.) 28.04.2026 gd Note: Registry is directed to carryout the necessary amendment and number the STA, if it is otherwise in order. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
MR.R.MANOHARAN Vs The Commissioner,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-28-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 28.04.2026CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN & W.M.P.Nos.14524 & 14525 of 2026 R.Manoharan S/o.late Rathna Thevar No.210, Strahans Road Pattalam, Chennai - 600 012. Petitioner(s) Vs Poonamalle High Road Zone-VI Chennai Corporation Purasaiwalkam, Periamet5. Sri Thatha Kasi Sadasiva, Arulmigu Swamigal Temple No.77, Demellows Road Pattalam, Chennai - 600 112 Rep. by its Managing Trustee D.Satheeshwaran. Respondent(s)Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of Certiorari calling for the records in Impugned Notice dated 24.01.2026, Ref. RDC(C) O.C.No.287/2026 on the file of the 2 nd respondent and quash the same to the extent of this petitioner writ petition Schedule-B property. For Petitioner(s): Mr.K.Seetharam For Respondent(s): Mr.E.C.Ramesh Standing Counsel for R1 to R3 Mr.M.Habeeb Rahman Government Advocate ...
R.Vivek Vs Suchithra R.
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-28-2026
C.M.P.No.9591 of 2026 in CRP SR.No.49309 of 2026T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.Dispensed with for the present. 28.04.2026 rri Note: Registry is directed to list the above Civil Revision Petition, after numbering the same, if they are otherwise in order, on 30.04.2026. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
- ‹ Prev
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- Next ›
- Last »